Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dance/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Posture dance?

I'm doing some research for a possible Posture dance article, with some sources collected at User talk:RoySmith/Posture dance. Ignoring the (many) search results which are about improving your posture through dance, I'm left with almost all the references to posture dance being related to haka. So much so that I suspect I'm looking at internet amplification effect, where everybody who writes anything about haka finds our article and parrots what it says.

So, is posture dance a real term, describing a generic style of dance? I found a couple of sources, but not enough to base an article on. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:50, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

• Your We Japanese book with "The Odori is a posture dance, with slow movements of the body, feet, arms, and hands. The dancers employ fans, sprays of blossoms, baskets of flowers, flags and other accessories according to the story the dancers endeavor to interpret." clearly implies that PD is a thing, and not a synonym for haka.
• "A Posture Dance on Stage (Maiko)" from Museum of Fine Arts Boston confirms that this is a phrase in use by knowledgeable art critics, that can be applied to e.g. Japanese dance.
• So in a very different context does Teaching Dance as Art in Education "Step 3—Compose it. Start to work on a short posture dance using the three motifs. The intent is to take pedestrian postures and stylize and abstract them to get raw material for a dance. ... The postures can be inspired by any number of everyday events... Make clear that the intent is to explore postural shapes in relation to each other."
• Bounty Chords: Music, Dance and Cultural Heritage on Norfolk and Pitcairn Islands "The costume displayed in the photograph reflects ... the style of dance being presented, identified in the original PIM photo-caption as 'an Ellice Islands posture dance 'fa'atele'."
• A Posture Dance by Women (illus. from Games and Pastimes of the Maori)
• and indeed Haka is frequently described as a "vigorous posture dance", etc. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:48, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

References

AFAIKT, "posture dance" is a term coined by relatively few authors, which denotes a type of dance in which performers assume various static poses in the course of dance movements. I've been unable to find evidence that the term is either formally defined or widely accepted. Lambtron talk 19:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

The examples I've given above include major museums from different continents, and span many decades. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:03, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

All of the sources appear to be using "posture dance" as an adjective, not as a formally defined term. So to answer your question, I would say that the term does indeed describe an essential aspect of some types of dance, but it isn't an "official" name for a dance genre unless some RS explicitly defines it as such. Lambtron talk 04:02, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

"A posture dance on stage" can only be a noun phrase; so is "work on a short posture dance"; so is "an Ellice Islands posture dance". Those cannot imaginably be verbs or adjectives. It's a thing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:58, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Grammar aside, it seems like WP:OR to infer a definition from these usage cases and base an article on that definition. Having said that, I agree that "posture dance" is a good descriptive term for any dance in which performers progress through a sequence of stationary poses. Also, it's obviously an attribute that's shared by many dances, which I suppose makes it "a thing". Lambtron talk 15:32, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Lambtron, kindly do not cast aspersions or seek to belittle other editors. I'm glad we agree on the fact that posture dance is a thing, long and widely used to name a type of dance. I have neither created an article nor presupposed any definition, so I certainly can't have committed any deadly crime. Clearly an article would require a good secondary source which provided both a definition and an overview. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:12, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Just found another source, looks like the best one so far. https://archive.org/details/danceman045 (there's a PDF scan at Forgotten Books. They make specific reference to an "Egypitian posture dance", "Pantomime posture dance", "Dramatic posture dance" -- RoySmith (talk) 16:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

On pages 29–30, that book has a section "Pantomime and Dramatic Posture Dance", without however defining the terms. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:32, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Didn't mean to belittle or criticize; sorry it came across that way. Keep digging; maybe some RS out there defines it. Lambtron talk 16:37, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Katherine Dunham in A Midsummer Night's Dream (1935)?

A referencing request: can someone familiar with the literature in this field dig up a high quality source that says Katherine Dunham was in the live Hollywood Bowl production that preceeded A Midsummer Night's Dream (1935)? Based on my understanding (which is limited, so caveat), it would have been an incidental part (effectively an extra; one among many dancers) and before she attained any kind of fame. I can't quite square this with her biography, and so far I've failed to find any decent sources for it (the sources do mention Butterfly McQueen though, as the "Butterfly" nickname came from the "Butterfly Ballet" here); but as this isn't my field… Can anyone here help? --Xover (talk) 08:10, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

RfC on creating a "Cultural impact of Michael Jackson" article

Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Cultural impact of Michael Jackson#Should this page and/or a "Michael Jackson in popular culture" page be a Wikipedia article?. A permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 12:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

A new newsletter directory is out!

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WPD listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:WPD. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Dance World Cup

Is it notable? It crops up in a current AfD and has a BBC item as well as its own website, and lots of coverage in local papers around the world on the lines of "local dancer wins medal at DWC" - and an article in a book on marketing. Any thoughts? Is it just a commercial scam, or something about which we should have an article? PamD 11:46, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

It's a real competition and one that has been trying to establish itself as the major global youth dance enterprise (as eclectic all-styles-welcome composite competitions go, anyway). Is it WP:NOTABLE? I don't know--I think it could probably survive an WP:AfD through a WP:GNG rationale without too much trouble, but of course that is a different question than whether I think it should have an article. You could certainly put together a fair number of independent reliable and secondary sources, but most of them would be local pieces celebrating small teams that made it into the event, rather than in-depth coverage of the competition itself as an encyclopedic topic. I can certainly assist in putting together the best of the available sources if you think you might want to author such an article. Snow ^{let's rap} 09:40, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

David Bintley

Hi there,

I would like to completely revamp and update David Bintley's page, but am unsure about how to cite my sources. I work for Birmingham Royal Ballet and have worked with David for 18 years. Part of his leaving gift as he stepped down as our Director a couple of weeks ago was a book I complied, some 380 pages, covering his whole career with both Royal Ballet Companies. I would like to include much of this information on his wikipedia page, as well as update and create new entries for all his ballets. My problem is my sources... there isn't that much published information, no book, for example, just reviews and a few interviews, and mostly from the last decade. In the process of compiling my book, I had access to both the Royal Opera House and Birmingham Royal Ballet archives (including every show report from 1978 to 2019), the Royal Ballet School archives, was in touch with the various companies he worked with abroad (i.e. National Ballet of Japan, San Francisco Ballet, Hong Kong Ballet, Stuttgart Ballet etc) and, most importantly, I had access to his wife's diaries from 1980 to 1995 as she worked on the book with me. None of these sources are public or verifiable by anyone not working for one of the Royal Ballet companies, so how can I cite them? I don't want anyone to feel the need to change random details, as I know what I have is correct. Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks a lot!

Hello Leea25 and welcome to the project! Thank you for your willingness to help flesh out Mr. Bintley's article. The first thing you will want to do as you begin to undertake this effort is familiarize yourself with some of our more critical community policies with regard to adding content: WP:Verification, WP:Reliable sources (particularly the sections WP:PRIMARY and WP:SECONDARY), and WP:WEIGHT. It's a lot to digest all at once, but given you are throwing yourself into the deep end a little by undertaking such a big augmentation of an existing article, it will save you a lot of time to start by getting a basic understanding of these project standards--if anything is confusing to you as you work your way through, please feel free to ask question here or my talk page.

The first thing you will come to understand as you work through those policies is that your situation is a little bit of sticky one; new users who have access to materials not in the public sphere are sometimes frustrated to learn that we usually cannot use such materials for sources (see WP:PUBLISHED). In this case, your archived materials present an open question, and one which you may want to broach with the WP:reliable sources noticeboard for community discussion as to how whether (and how) you may be able to get some usage out of them here--though I must tell you my initial inclination is that it will be an uphill task to get them accepted if they are not published in the traditional sense. Still, operating from your unique position of having considerable access to the Royal Ballet's administration and archives, there may very well be a way to leverage your resources to provide citations to new insights into Mr. Bintley's career. I take it that the you compiled was merely a memento and a collection of primary sources, rather than your own writing on his career which you intend to publish? If I am mistaken in that and this is a professional research work that might be published, we'd be able to use said book as secondary source in its own right.

On one last note (for now), be sure to sign your posts by adding ~~~~ at the end! :) Snow ^{let's rap} 09:15, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi Snow Rise and thanks for the reply. Yes, I am already embroilled in all that... I'm not sure I am going to be able to do much at all as apparently my connection to Mr Bintley constitutes a conflict of interest, so I shouldn't really be editing anything on his page, which is frustrating. I'm in the midst of a long and very interesting discussion with an editor called Nat on another page about the issues. It seems a great shame that the current (and very understandable) policies of Wikipedia effectively prohibit use of what would historically be considered primary sources because they are not in the public domain. As I've been discusing with Nat, my main interest is obscure classical composers, of which there are many thousands. Most of the information about them is hidden away in archives and libraries, or in brief, in long-out-of-print books. Detailed information about them is unlikely to ever make it into print or onto the web. My book, sadly, only exists in 4 copies which belong to me, Birmingham Royal Ballet, David himself and the chair of our board. I'll keep you posted with my progress, but it's not looking hopeful, which is very frustrating! Leea25 (talk) 14:31, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi again Leea25: Yes, I can certainly understand how the situation would be frustrating, but I gather from your comments that Nat has already explained the important purposes that are served by restricting statements to those supported by citations to documents that meet our WP:RS standards. I would like to reiterate to you the recommendation that you take this matter to WP:RSN: if you would like me to format that inquiry for you to improve the odds of the discussion getting off to a useful start, I would be happy to do that. I have given your situation some thought since my initial response, but the truth of the matter is, even though I have long history here, with lots of engagement on the issue of what constitutes a reliable source, your uncommon situation has thwarted my ability to come up with a concrete conclusion as to whether there might be a work-around for you. But RSN is filled with editors who obsess over these matters, and it might be that someone there can figure out how we proceed to make some use of your resources--worst case scenario, you get a definite answer that we can't use these sources in any capacity, and at least then we'd know for sure. As to the conflict of issue matter, I can help with that. As an independent party, I (along with any other editors who may be active on that article) can vet any additions you wish to make to the article for consistency with our policies, and I'm willing to take the time to assist in that capacity, if we can get the sources themselves past the RS hurdle. I'll check in on the talk page discussion later and see if there's anything there which puts additional twists on any of this. Snow ^{let's rap} 19:42, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi Snow Rise. Thank you for your advice and offer of time - I really appreciate it. As I said on the other thread, I'm finding this all rather disheartening, partly because I have come to the realisation that Wikipedia is not what I thought it was. I don't mean to sound rude in saying that, but I thought it genuinely was a 'go to' site for information and have always treated it as such, not realising that really, only information found elsewhere should be included. From my point of view as someone very interested in obscure 20th century classical music and dance, that excludes an extraordinary amount of information that will, in all likelihood, never be published in a reliable secondary source. Any way, I'm going on! I think I would like to take the issue to the RS Noticeboard, if you will help me. I've no idea how best to approach the subject other than repeating what I initially wrote here (without all the grumbling about policy!). What would you advise? My only other thought is to write a long piece for the BRB website, persaude them to publish, it and use that as a reference, but it would mean writing an awful lot of information out three times, rather than twice. :) Thanks again Leea25 (talk) 22:15, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay in response Leea25: I have now placed an inquiry at RSN regarding your situation, asking for input as to how to proceed. My suspicion is that it may very well become necessary for you to publish something via the BRB in order to make full use of your resources. Even that might face some detractors as to whether it would satisfy WP:RS, but I think it should not be difficult to get past that bar. Actually, we are fortunate in that most people similarly positioned with primary sources often find they cannot use them at all, whereas your situation and role with the BRB do manage to give us some potential options. But in any event, vetting it with RSN first so as to not have you go through the effort for nothing, is a good idea. It might also be that the editors there will know of a work-around in policy that will allow you to be more directly cite the primary sources in the archive, but I am less hopeful about that--though I foregrounded requests in this vein in the inquiry.

Regarding Wikipedia operating/being a different kind of resource than you previously thought, I can see how it would be frustrated in your particular position, but I think with time, you will come to appreciate why we operate the encyclopedia in this way, and that it has many benefits to reliability in our content. In order to keep fake, misleading, or biased information (and the bias could as easily be negative and positive), we need a standard that operates independent of first hand knowledge of a topic. The RS standard also removes subjective assessment by our individual editors (or groups thereof) from the process of validating statements/content. Not only does this lead to vastly more reliable and neutral content across our articles in the aggregate, it also prevents talk pages from devolving into ceaseless cycles of repetitive arguments about the "truth", from editors asserting their own take on circumstances: by requiring that their argument be based in the WP:WEIGHT of the sources, we pin resolution to a more objective standard, and thus prevent loggerhead arguments that could never be resolved. This is an essential function (and don't worry about being new tot he idea: I think it's actually overlooked by the vast majority of even our longterm editors!) that prevents work on most articles on the project from grinding to a halt on a daily basis. Anyway, with some luck and some time donated by the volunteers at RSN, we should find a path forward to allowing you to translate the content into the article. Snow ^{let's rap} 21:43, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, Snow Rise. I have added a lengthy comment to the thread you started there. Leea25 (talk) 00:07, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Snow Rise:. It seems our discussion on the other forum about useful citations has been deleted. Any idea why? I had asked quite a lot of questions in my last post... Thanks a lot! Leea25 (talk) 17:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi again Leea25. It would appear that the thread was archived for inactivity by the bot that maintains the page. The archived discussion can be found Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_269 if you need to reference it. I'm sorry that I couldn't be more active in the discussion to keep that from happening, but I had to travel extensively this week for a professional obligation. The good news is that the results of that discussion are a lot more positive, in terms of your options, than I anticipated them being. In short, it would seem that despite my initial doubts as to the policy restraints, there's a lot that we can do with your sources, because many are considered "published" for our purposes, insofar as your archives are open to the public. I will confess that I'm not sure how we will format those citations, since I have never cited on-project to informal archives, but we'll find a way to stumble through that together. To begin with, please present any questions you still have to me here (but do me a favour and bullet point them in short paragraphs so I can isolate and respond to the issues better). I will answer those question to the best of my ability. Once that is done, you can begin writing the content you want to add to the article in [[User:Leea25/sandbox|your personal sandbox], which is an area you can use to test out content before we add it to the article in a finished state (I will take the liberty of adding the current version of the Bintley article into it after I finish this message, and you can work on editing a draft version from there. Add citations using our relevant policy on the topic, and I will try to check in every day or so make what edits I can to move things along and provide feedback. Please forgive me if I am slow now and then though: this coming month is likely to quite busy for me. :) Snow ^{let's rap} 05:17, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks a lot @Snow Rise:, and again for the offer of help. I was hoping to get the bulk of this done over the last two weeks as I have had a fortnight off work. I'm back at work on Monday, so I'll just have to get things done as I can. Would it be helpful if I tagged you in here once I've had the chance to make some edits, to save you checking? Thanks, Leea25 (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Happy to be of help. :) Yes, you can always ping me here whenever you get around to working on the matter. Or you can leave a message on my talk page or ping me to yours. I'll also add the sandbox to my watchlist for now. As to the timing, don't sweat that--one of our more informal (but more or less universally embraced) principles here is that there is generally WP:NORUSH when it comes to such things. :) Besides, doing it piecemeal will allow you to internalize some of the technicalities of the editing as you go. In any event, let me know if/when/how I can be of assistance! Snow ^{let's rap} 19:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

New article on Boogaloo

Hi fellow dance editors, I just wanted to highlight a new article on the street dance Boogaloo (which help developed into modern day Popping) that I helped curate info on. Please let me know any suggestions i.e. the best way to integrate it in the larger WikiDance project, or how to improve its quality scale, I very much appreciate it! Thanks. PatisOne (talk) 05:14, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Portal:Dance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Dance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Dance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. Certes (talk) 17:56, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

Hello, Please note that Ballet, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 16 December 2019 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

Bugaku (ballet)

Hi there,

This article appears to be in Spanish. I'm not knowledgeable in this area so I feel it would be better if someone from round here could have a look at it. SFletcher06 (talk) 11:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

@SFletcher06: A lot of Spanish content was added by one editor in March 2019 in several edits. They left the original English version below their additions. I've now removed the Spanish text. There doesn't seem to be an article about this ballet in Spanish Wikipedia. PamD 11:27, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

I've made a note on the talk page, and left a link there to the last version with the Spanish content as it has sources which might be useful for anyone wanting to expand the article. The editor concerned made no edits before or after their work on this article. PamD 11:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

@PamD: Thanks. SFletcher06 (talk) 11:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Bill T. Jones/Arnie Zane Dance Company and Talk:New York Live Arts#Merger proposal

Articles that you have been involved in editing—Bill T. Jones/Arnie Zane Dance Company and Talk:New York Live Arts#Merger proposal—have been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. StarM 22:08, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

OK, either this template doesn't work, or I did it wrong. Or both. Anyway, would love this project's input on this discussion I just started between the two organizations that merged to form New York Live Arts. Thank you. StarM 22:08, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Creating South African dance related articles

Hello I am a new write and am looking to publish a biography article. looking for consensus or perhaps an active editor to look through what I am writing and let me know if the article is up to scratch or not. Thank you I will add this page to my watchlist.DanceEnthusiast (talk) 23:45, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Melbourne shuffle § Is this the dance going viral on TikTok?

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Melbourne shuffle § Is this the dance going viral on TikTok?. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 04:52, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Western Asian dance

Please can someone with knowledge of western Asian dance look at recent edits to Kochari, Halay, Akdağmadeni halay, Turkish dance and Horon (dance)? There appears to be a difference of opinion over which ethnic groups to mention. Thanks, Certes (talk) 11:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Cuties

The most prominent film right now about dance and it's controversial. Can I get more people to add the film to their watchlist? Just having more people give input on the articles helps a lot.

• Cuties
• Netflix#Cuties
• Criticism_of_Netflix#Cuties

Harizotoh9 (talk) 06:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Women in Red Asian women contest

From 1 October to 31 December, Women in Red is running a virtual contest on Asian women. In November, this will coincide with Wikipedia Asian Month. We look forward to strong participation from all those interested in improving coverage of female dancers from Asia.--Ipigott (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Love Lies Bleeding (Ballet) - Performance/Tour Dates

Hi everyone!

I'm a relatively new user and I just created the bulk of the article for Love Lies Bleeding, the ballet performed by the Alberta Ballet Company that features songs performed by Elton John. I included a section with their various performances, but it was hard to pinpoint all of the possible performances for the show. Would someone be able to take a look at that section and help me find some more tour dates? Thank you so much! - TM21NU (talk) 19:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Maria Tallchief § Google Doodle traffic

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Maria Tallchief § Google Doodle traffic. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 19:47, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Devadasi

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Devadasi § RfC: Should article reference reports of sexual exploitation and prostitution in the modern day. Ujwal.Xankill3r (talk) 07:21, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richmond Robottin

The article Richmond Robottin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and no evidence of notability for almost a decade

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 02:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Igor Dobrovolskiy (choreographer)

Is this person really notable? Bearian (talk) 23:52, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Modern western square dance

Hello dancers,

I don't suppose there is anyone still paying attention to this group. I've been going through the articles needing rewrite backlog, and I'm trying to finish the history section of Modern western square dance that someone outlined but never finished many years ago. I would appreciate if anyone could help, maybe point me to good sources.

Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 06:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Miscellaneous ballet character redirects to lists has been nominated for deletion

Category:Miscellaneous ballet character redirects to lists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 02:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Free high-quality sources

Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library offers free access to reference books such as The Oxford Handbook of Dance and Theater to editors who have made more than 500 edits (ever) and meet the other basic qualifications. Login to https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/users/my_library/ and look for the "Oxford Handbooks" option. There are thousands of other paywalled sources available. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Performing arts and dance in New Zealand

There is a current project running in New Zealand funded by the Wikimedia Foundation to increase content on Performing Arts in Aotearoa / New Zealand. Any editors from outside of New Zealand are also invited to participate. For more information this is the project page: [1] and this is the grant application: [2]

It is a focus of the project to ensure content of women and Indigenous Peoples theatre practioners to address the balance in Wikipedia. There are many suggested articles for creation or improvement and resources available on-line. Please feel free to contact me on my talk page for more information.

Many thanks, Pakoire (talk) 22:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

INDIAN CLASSICAL DANCER

hey i am creating an article about a kathak dancer and i need your help and guidance Udbhavsirvastav (talk) 21:06, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Blackburn Twins

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blackburn Twins Djflem (talk) 17:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Matthew Bourne

Clearly notable person, awful article. Unsourced and promotional, probably since its creation years ago. Anyone who has the time and inclination to improve this is welcome to have at it. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:40, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Ice dancing

Is ice dancing, a species of figure skating, considered "dancing" for purposed of dance categorization? I'm inclined to revert this edit, but thought I'd check first. TJRC (talk) 22:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Popular pages

Today I added a wikilink to "Popular pages" at WP Dance / Assessment. This is a monthly bot-generated list of pageviews, useful for focused cleanup of frequently viewed articles. JoeNMLC (talk) 15:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Cleanup listing

At Dance - Assessment; under the "Dance articles by quality and importance" table, I added template for Dance "Cleanup listing". It's generated weekly (usually Tuesday) by CleanupWorklistBot & is helpful to find articles with specific issues. JoeNMLC (talk) 15:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Jig

There's a problem with this article: the title is not defined in the lead section, which uses a different term. I'm not familiar with the issues at stake, so I wanted to bring it to this WikiProject's attention so it can be fixed. Thanks! --Albany NY (talk) 04:44, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Pas de Basques#Requested move 5 February 2022

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Pas de Basques#Requested move 5 February 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Favonian (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Dappan koothu#Requested move 16 March 2022

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Dappan koothu#Requested move 16 March 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 00:20, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources

Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Dartington Morris Men#Requested move 9 November 2022

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Dartington Morris Men#Requested move 9 November 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 15:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Ball culture#Requested move 13 November 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Ball culture#Requested move 13 November 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran (talk) 03:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Weapon dance

Weapon dance has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 19:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Manipuri Raas Leela#Requested move 6 February 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Manipuri Raas Leela#Requested move 6 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 17:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

FAR for His Majesty's Theatre, London

User:Buidhe has nominated His Majesty's Theatre, London for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:08, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Featured Article Save Award for His Majesty's Theatre, London

There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/His Majesty's Theatre, London/archive1. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:00, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Electronic dance music

An article that you have been involved in editing—Electronic dance music—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Dances in Iran#Requested move 4 August 2022

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Dances in Iran#Requested move 4 August 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)