Template:RQ:NYT
“(please specify the article title)”, in The New York Times, New York, N.Y.: The New York Times Company, →ISSN, →OCLC:
- The following documentation is located at Template:RQ:NYT/documentation. [edit]
- Useful links: subpage list • links • redirects • transclusions • errors (parser/module) • sandbox
Usage
[edit]This template may be used on Wiktionary entry pages to quote an article from The New York Times. It can be used to create a link to an online version of the article at the New York Times website or, preferably, a version of it archived at the Internet Archive.
Parameters
[edit]The template takes the following parameters:
|1=or|author=, and|authorlink=– use|1=or|author=to specify the name of the author of the article, and|authorlink=the name of a Wikipedia article about the author. To add the names of coauthors, use|author2=to|author5=, and|authorlink2=to|authorlink5=.|quotee=– the name of a person or other source quoted.|2=or|title=– mandatory: the title of the article quoted.|url=,|archiveurl=, and/or|archivedate=– mandatory in some cases:- Where possible, use
|archiveurl=to specify the URL of an online version of the article archived at the Internet Archive. (It is not necessary to use|archivedate=.) - If the article is archived on another website, use
|url=to specify the original URL, and|archiveurl=and|archivedate=to specify the archive URL and the date of archiving.
- Where possible, use
- This parameter must be specified to have the template link to an online version of the work.
|section=– the name of the section of the newspaper quoted from, or the section number in Arabic numerals.|3=or|date=, or – mandatory: use|3=or|date=to specify the date of the article quoted from, or|year=if only the year is known.|volume=and|issue=– the volume and issue number of the print version of the article quoted.|page=or|pages=– the page number(s) of the print version of the article quoted. When quoting a range of pages, separate the first and last pages of the range with an en dash, like this:|pages=10–11.|column=or|columns=– the column number(s) quoted from, either|column=1or|column=2. If quoting from both columns, either omit this parameter or separate the column numbers with an en dash, like this:|columns=1–2.|4=,|text=, or|passage=– the passage to be quoted.|footer=– a comment on the passage quoted.|brackets=– use|brackets=onto surround a quotation with brackets. This indicates that the quotation either contains a mere mention of a term (for example, "some people find the word manoeuvre hard to spell") rather than an actual use of it (for example, "we need to manoeuvre carefully to avoid causing upset"), or does not provide an actual instance of a term but provides information about related terms.
Examples
[edit]- Wikitext:
{{RQ:NYT|author=Ivan Krastev|authorlink=Ivan Krastev|title=Of course they gave up on democracy|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20230327185955/http://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/09/opinion/democracy-eastern-europe.html|date=9 March 2020|passage=In 1989, when Vice President {{w|Dan Quayle}} nonsensically remarked that "I believe we are on an irreversible trend toward more freedom and democracy, but that could change," we all dutifully relished the gaffe. But he turns out to have been right. What once seemed '''foreordained''' has mysteriously slipped our grasp.}}{{RQ:NYT|{{w|Ivan Krastev}}|Of course they gave up on democracy|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20230327185955/http://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/09/opinion/democracy-eastern-europe.html|9 March 2020|In 1989, when Vice President {{w|Dan Quayle}} nonsensically remarked that "I believe we are on an irreversible trend toward more freedom and democracy, but that could change," we all dutifully relished the gaffe. But he turns out to have been right. What once seemed '''foreordained''' has mysteriously slipped our grasp.}}
- Result:
- 2020 March 9, Ivan Krastev, “Of course they gave up on democracy”, in The New York Times[1], New York, N.Y.: The New York Times Company, →ISSN, →OCLC, archived from the original on 2023-03-27:
- In 1989, when Vice President Dan Quayle nonsensically remarked that "I believe we are on an irreversible trend toward more freedom and democracy, but that could change," we all dutifully relished the gaffe. But he turns out to have been right. What once seemed foreordained has mysteriously slipped our grasp.