Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Classes: test that "regular" impls work for classes #2287

Closed
catamorphism opened this issue Apr 25, 2012 · 0 comments
Closed

Classes: test that "regular" impls work for classes #2287

catamorphism opened this issue Apr 25, 2012 · 0 comments
Labels
A-type-system Area: Type system E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Milestone

Comments

@catamorphism
Copy link
Contributor

I already implemented the class C implements D syntax, but I also want to test to make sure that writing an impl item like impl X of Y for Z works if Z is a class type.

@ghost ghost assigned catamorphism Apr 25, 2012
@catamorphism catamorphism removed their assignment Jun 16, 2014
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this issue Sep 22, 2022
stacked borrows: add option for recursive field retagging
celinval pushed a commit to celinval/rust-dev that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2024
jieyouxu pushed a commit to jieyouxu/rust that referenced this issue Mar 18, 2025
…pter-cleaning

"Running tests" chapter cleaning
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-type-system Area: Type system E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant