Subtree sync for rustc_codegen_cranelift

[bjorn3]

Apart from a perf optimization for some crates (rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift#1541) not much changed this time as the last sync was less than a week ago.

r? @ghost

@rustbot label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler

[rustbot]

There are merge commits (commits with multiple parents) in your changes. We have a no merge policy so these commits will need to be removed for this pull request to be merged.

You can start a rebase with the following commands:

$ # rebase
$ git pull --rebase https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git master
$ git push --force-with-lease

The following commits are merge commits:

• 12677fd
• c94f759
• cc7d30a
• aedbae6
• 2b97b2a
• e7279c8
• e9ac680

[bjorn3]

@bors r+ p=1 subtree sync

[bors]

📌 Commit c94f759 has been approved by bjorn3

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit c94f759 with merge b73478b...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: bjorn3
Pushing b73478b to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (b73478b): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -0.1%, secondary 4.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.2%	[2.2%, 2.2%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.4%	[4.4%, 4.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.4%	[-2.4%, -2.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-2.4%, 2.2%]	2

Cycles

Results (primary -3.8%, secondary -2.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.8%	[-4.0%, -3.5%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.4%	[-2.4%, -2.4%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-3.8%	[-4.0%, -3.5%]	2

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 781.672s -> 781.253s (-0.05%)
Artifact size: 335.35 MiB -> 335.38 MiB (0.01%)