Stabilize flags for doctest cross compilation

[ehuss]

This makes the following changes in preparation for supporting doctest cross-compiling in cargo:

• Renames --runtool and --runtool-arg to --test-runtool and --test-runtool-arg to maintain consistency with other --test-* arguments.
• Stabilizes the --test-runtool and --test-runtool-arg. These are needed in order to support cargo's target.runner option which specifies a runner to execute a cross-compiled doctest (for example, qemu).
• Stabilizes the --enable-per-target-ignores flag by removing it and making it unconditionally enabled. This makes it possible to disable a doctest on a per-target basis, which I think will be helpful for rolling out this feature.

These changes were suggested in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/266220-t-rustdoc/topic/stabilizing.20doctest.20xcompile/near/409281127

The intent is to stabilize the doctest-xcompile feature in cargo. This will help ensure that for projects that do cross-compile testing that their doctests are also covered. Currently there is a somewhat surprising behavior that they are ignored.

Closes #64245

[rustbot]

r? @fmease

rustbot has assigned @fmease.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[rustbot]

This PR modifies tests/run-make/. If this PR is trying to port a Makefile
run-make test to use rmake.rs, please update the
run-make port tracking issue
so we can track our progress. You can either modify the tracking issue
directly, or you can comment on the tracking issue and link this PR.

cc @jieyouxu

The Miri subtree was changed

cc @rust-lang/miri

[bors]

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #138830) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

[ehuss]

@fmease @GuillaumeGomez Just checking if this can be put on the team's radar?

[GuillaumeGomez]

On my review list now. :)

[GuillaumeGomez]

I think they've been around for enough time. Let's start an FCP then.

@rfcbot fcp merge

[rfcbot]

Team member @GuillaumeGomez has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members:

• @GuillaumeGomez
• @Manishearth
• @Nemo157
• @aDotInTheVoid
• @camelid
• @fmease
• @jsha
• @notriddle

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.