Update bootstrap to edition 2024

[Kobzol]

The stage0 compiler now supports edition 2024, so we can update bootstrap to it. I manually reviewed all the changes from cargo fix --edition and reverted most of them (if let -> matches changes and two unneeded usages of use <>).

r? @onur-ozkan

try-job: dist-x86_64-msvc

[onur-ozkan]

Looks good, thanks!

[onur-ozkan]

Waiting for CI to be green.

[antoyo]

The GCC failure can probably fixed by updating this file to this commit which contains the fix for the x87 error.

[Kobzol]

I probably won't update the GCC version yet, because #136921 is in the queue, and it would conflict with that change.

[Kobzol]

Rebased.

[onur-ozkan]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit b1731a1 has been approved by onur-ozkan

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[onur-ozkan]

Waiting for CI to be green.

I forgot that, sorry.

Oh, you were waiting for #137612 (comment)

[klensy]

Failed build, rollup #138044 will fail too.

2025-03-05T08:38:30.8289112Z �[0m�[1m�[38;5;9merror[E0133]�[0m�[0m�[1m: call to unsafe function `remove_var` is unsafe and requires unsafe block�[0m
2025-03-05T08:38:30.8289911Z �[0m   �[0m�[0m�[1m�[38;5;12m--> �[0m�[0msrc/bootstrap/src/utils/cc_detect/tests.rs:210:5�[0m
2025-03-05T08:38:30.8290587Z �[0m    �[0m�[0m�[1m�[38;5;12m|�[0m
2025-03-05T08:38:30.8294165Z �[0m�[1m�[38;5;12m210�[0m�[0m �[0m�[0m�[1m�[38;5;12m|�[0m�[0m �[0m�[0m    env::remove_var("WASI_SDK_PATH");�[0m
2025-03-05T08:38:30.8294898Z �[0m    �[0m�[0m�[1m�[38;5;12m|�[0m�[0m     �[0m�[0m�[1m�[38;5;9m^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^�[0m�[0m �[0m�[0m�[1m�[38;5;9mcall to unsafe function�[0m
2025-03-05T08:38:30.8295661Z �[0m    �[0m�[0m�[1m�[38;5;12m|�[0m
2025-03-05T08:38:30.8296334Z �[0m    �[0m�[0m�[1m�[38;5;12m= �[0m�[0m�[1mnote�[0m�[0m: consult the function's documentation for information on how to avoid undefined behavior�[0m

[Kobzol]

@bors try

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit ed5877e with merge b0e263f...

[rust-log-analyzer]

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

   Compiling ureq v3.0.8
   Compiling citool v0.1.0 (/home/runner/work/rust/rust/src/ci/citool)
    Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized] target(s) in 6.84s
     Running `target/debug/citool calculate-job-matrix`
Run type: TryJob { custom_jobs: Some(["`*msvc*`"]) }
Error: Failed to calculate job matrix

Caused by:
    Custom job(s) ``*msvc*`` not found in auto jobs
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
Post job cleanup.

[Kobzol]

@bors try

[Kobzol]

@bors rollup=never

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit ed5877e with merge 8de4b34...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 8de4b34 (8de4b340ec1fc40f724bbd7d2b2702c37272acbf)

[Kobzol]

@bors r=onur-ozkan

Let's hope I didn't accidentally revert a fix for the third time in a row... It's at least rollup=never now.

[bors]

📌 Commit ed5877e has been approved by onur-ozkan

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit ed5877e with merge 004e43c...

[rust-log-analyzer]

The job x86_64-gnu-distcheck failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[onur-ozkan]

The failure doesn't seem relevant to this PR.

@bors retry

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit ed5877e with merge 0998d40...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: onur-ozkan
Pushing 0998d40 to master...

[github-actions]

Post-merge analysis result

Test differences

No test diffs found

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (0998d40): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 5.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	5.9%	[5.9%, 5.9%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	5.9%	[5.9%, 5.9%]	1

Cycles

Results (secondary 0.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.4%	[3.6%, 5.1%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.7%	[-3.1%, -2.0%]	5
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 779.955s -> 779.667s (-0.04%)
Artifact size: 365.24 MiB -> 365.24 MiB (0.00%)