Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Explore
By company size
By use case
By industry
View all solutions
Topics
- AI
- DevOps
- Security
- Software Development
- View all
Explore
- GitHub Sponsors
  Fund open source developers
- The ReadME Project
  GitHub community articles
Repositories
- Enterprise platform
  AI-powered developer platform
Available add-ons
Pricing

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Search

Clear

Search syntax tips

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Name

Query

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.

You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

Dismiss alert

rust-lang / rust Public

Notifications
Fork 13.2k
Star 102k

Additional navigation options

Code
Issues
Pull requests
Actions
Projects
Security
Insights

[nothing to see here] this is probably a bad idea but I'm curious#137702

Draft

scottmcm wants to merge 2 commits intorust-lang:masterrust-lang/rust:masterfrom scottmcm:deconstruct-optionsscottmcm/rust:deconstruct-optionsCopy head branch name to clipboard

Conversation Commits2 (2)Checks Files changed

Commits

Commits on Feb 27, 2025

Add a MIR test for simplifying checked_sub
scottmcm
committed
Probably a bad idea but I'm curious
scottmcm
committed

Footer

© 2025 GitHub, Inc.

Footer navigation

Terms
Privacy
Security
Status
Docs
Contact

You can’t perform that action at this time.