-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #138450
Rollup of 6 pull requests #138450
Conversation
The LLVM issue [1] was fixed with [2], which is included in the LLVM20 upgrade. Tests no longer fail, so enable them here. [1]: llvm/llvm-project#98681 [2]: llvm/llvm-project#98681
Due to a reorganization in the `libc` crate, the `xous` target broke with version `0.2.170`. Bump libc to `0.2.171` to fix nightly. Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
The list of `ASM_SUPPORTED_ARCHS` was missing a few from the compiler's actual stable list.
build_session_options always uses materialize_sysroot anyway.
All callers unwrap the result.
…trieb attempt to support `BinaryFormat::Xcoff` in `naked_asm!` Fixes rust-lang#137219 So, the inline assembly support for xcoff is extremely limited. The LLVM [XCOFFAsmParser](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/1b25c0c4da968fe78921ce77736e5baef4db75e3/llvm/lib/MC/MCParser/XCOFFAsmParser.cpp) does not support many of the attributes that LLVM itself emits, and that should exist based on [the assembler docs](https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/ssw_aix_71/assembler/assembler_pdf.pdf). It also does accept some that should not exist based on those docs. So, I've tried to do the best I can given those limitations. At least it's better than emitting the directives for elf and having that fail somewhere deep in LLVM. Given that inline assembly for this target is incomplete (under `asm_experimental_arch`), I think that's OK (and again I don't see how we can do better given the limitations in LLVM). r? ```@Noratrieb``` (given that you reviewed rust-lang#136637) It seems reasonable to ping the [`powerpc64-ibm-aix` target maintainers](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/platform-support/aix.html), hopefully they have thoughts too: ```@daltenty``` ```@gilamn5tr```
…turing-arg, r=aDotInTheVoid,compiler-errors make precise capturing args in rustdoc Json typed close rust-lang#137616 This PR includes below changes. - Add `rustc_hir::PreciseCapturingArgKind` which allows the query system to return a arg's data. - Add `rustdoc::clean::types::PreciseCapturingArg` and change to use it. - Add `rustdoc-json-types::PreciseCapturingArg` and change to use it. - Update `tests/rustdoc-json/impl-trait-precise-capturing.rs`. - Bump `rustdoc_json_types::FORMAT_VERSION`.
Enable `f16` tests for `powf` The LLVM issue [1] was fixed with [2], which is included in the LLVM20 upgrade. Tests no longer fail, so enable them here. [1]: llvm/llvm-project#98681 [2]: llvm/llvm-project#98681 try-job: aarch64-gnu try-job: x86_64-gnu-aux
…jhpratt bump libc to 0.2.171 to fix xous Due to a reorganization in the `libc` crate, the `xous` target broke with version `0.2.170`. Bump libc to `0.2.171` to fix nightly.
Update compiletest's `has_asm_support` to match rustc The list of `ASM_SUPPORTED_ARCHS` was missing a few from the compiler's actual stable list.
…=petrochenkov,jieyouxu Cleanup sysroot locating a bit All commits should preserve existing behavior.
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: a2aba0578b In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
Post-merge analysis result Test differences
(and 20 additional diffs) |
Finished benchmarking commit (93257e2): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 1.3%, secondary 2.8%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 775.375s -> 775.02s (-0.05%) |
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#137816 (attempt to support `BinaryFormat::Xcoff` in `naked_asm!`) - rust-lang#138109 (make precise capturing args in rustdoc Json typed) - rust-lang#138343 (Enable `f16` tests for `powf`) - rust-lang#138356 (bump libc to 0.2.171 to fix xous) - rust-lang#138371 (Update compiletest's `has_asm_support` to match rustc) - rust-lang#138404 (Cleanup sysroot locating a bit) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Successful merges:
BinaryFormat::Xcoff
innaked_asm!
#137816 (attempt to supportBinaryFormat::Xcoff
innaked_asm!
)f16
tests forpowf
#138343 (Enablef16
tests forpowf
)has_asm_support
to match rustc #138371 (Update compiletest'shas_asm_support
to match rustc)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup