Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggest crate keyword when unresolved path contains current crate's name #138529

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

joculatrix
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #138312.

Unsure about the second "help" message suggested by the issue writer, but for at least the main part of the issue, I've added a check to emit a suggestion replacing the current crate's name in a path with crate. Let me know if there's a more elegant way to do this.

Prioritizing the added check for the crate's name at the top of
`report_path_resolution_error()` seems to account for differences
in Rust 2015 and 2018's crate/module path systems, allowing
the same suggestion to show up for Rust 2015.
(The `help` annotation was missing due to an issue that, admittedly,
resulted from a typo I stared at and didn't catch.)
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 15, 2025

r? @estebank

rustbot has assigned @estebank.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants