Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(ui): add tuple-struct-where-clause-suggestion ui test for #91520 #138782

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2025

Conversation

karolzwolak
Copy link
Contributor

@karolzwolak karolzwolak commented Mar 21, 2025

Fixes #91520

I tried to also make it a .fixed test, but I failed to accomplish that.
That's because of the 'consider annotating Inner<T> with #[derive(Clone)]' suggestion does not compile (conflicting Clone implementations), and I can't isolate them with rustfix-only-machine-applicable as both suggestions are not marked as MachineApplicable.
Instead I just test that the where clause suggestion is applied to the correct line.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 21, 2025

r? @petrochenkov

rustbot has assigned @petrochenkov.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 21, 2025
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r? compiler-errors @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 21, 2025

📌 Commit 2c77a07 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 21, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#138609 (Add stack overflow handler for cygwin)
 - rust-lang#138639 (Clean UI tests 2 of n)
 - rust-lang#138773 (catch_unwind intrinsic: document return value)
 - rust-lang#138782 (test(ui): add tuple-struct-where-clause-suggestion ui test for rust-lang#91520)
 - rust-lang#138794 (expand: Do not report `cfg_attr` traces on macros as unused attributes)
 - rust-lang#138801 (triagebot: add autolabel rules for D-* and L-*)
 - rust-lang#138804 (Allow inlining for `Atomic*::from_ptr`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit f463e47 into rust-lang:master Mar 22, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.87.0 milestone Mar 22, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#138782 - karolzwolak:where-test-91520, r=compiler-errors

test(ui): add tuple-struct-where-clause-suggestion ui test for rust-lang#91520

Fixes rust-lang#91520

I tried to also make it a .fixed test, but I failed to accomplish that.
That's because of the 'consider annotating `Inner<T>` with `#[derive(Clone)]`' suggestion does not compile (conflicting Clone implementations), and I can't isolate them with `rustfix-only-machine-applicable` as both suggestions are not marked as `MachineApplicable`.
Instead I just test that the where clause suggestion is applied to the correct line.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

where clause for tuple structs recommended at wrong place causing syntax errors
5 participants