Abstract
Tremendous effort has been exerted over the past few decades to construct multi-attribute decision functions with the capacity to model heterogeneous interrelationships among attributes. In this paper, we report an empirical study aiming to test whether or not considering interrelationships among attributes can benefit the representation of real preferences in multi-attribute ranking tasks. The generalized extended Bonferroni mean (GEBM) has recently been advocated as a promising and efficient tool for modeling heterogeneous interrelationships among attributes. We compare the GEBM with one of its most widely adopted competitors, simple additive weighting (SAW), in terms of their fitting quality when applied to preference elicitation. The attribute performances are manifested uniformly with the use of three widely-adopted utility measurements. Subsequently afterwards, the maximum split approach to establish the constraint objective function in regression for both the GEBM and the SAW to test whether or not all constraints resulting from the subject’s ranking can be fulfilled. On this bases, the number of fully or partly fitted subjects, consistency for subjects according to the better fitting model, and reliability of attribute weights learned by either the GEBM or the SAW are empirically examined in a bid to demonstrate the quantitative construction of fitting quality measurement. With the established fitting quality measurement, the necessity of taking heterogeneous interrelationships among attributes into account when constructing multi-attribute decision functions to represent real preferences can be analyzed. The main conclusion from the empirical study suggests that the relative performance of the two aggregation paradigms examined here depends on which fitting quality measurements are adopted. Researchers enthusiastic to discover the heterogeneous interrelationships among attributes when constructing multi-attribute decision functions might find the present results relevant when modeling actual preferences, and consequently this work should serve as a useful reference for enterprises and service providers seeking to strategically drive customer purchasing decisions.
Article PDF
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
M. Aggarwal, On learning of weights through preferences, Inf. Sci. 321 (2015), 90–102
G.-H. Tzeng, J.-J. Huang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 2011.
C.A.B. e Costa, É.C. Corrêa, J.-M. De Corte, J.-C. Vansnick, Facilitating bid evaluation in public call for tenders: a socio-technical approach, Omega. 30 (2002), 227–242
Y. Wu, Y. Dong, J. Qin, W. Pedrycz, Flexible linguistic expressions and consensus reaching with accurate constraints in group decision-making, IEEE Trans. Cybern. (2019).
L. Martínez, R.M. Rodríguez, F. Herrera, The 2-tuple Linguistic Model: Computing with Words in Decision Making, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015.
R.M. Rodríguez, Á. Labella, L. Martínez, An overview on fuzzy modelling of complex linguistic preferences in decision making, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 9 (2016), 81–94
S.-H. Xiong, Z.-S. Chen, K.-S. Chin, A novel MAGDM approach with proportional hesitant fuzzy sets, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 11 (2018), 256–271
Z.-S. Chen, K.-S. Chin, Y.-L. Li, Y. Yang, On generalized extended Bonferroni means for decision making, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 24 (2016), 1525–1543
Z.-S. Chen, Y. Yang, X.-J. Wang, K.-S. Chin, K.-L. Tsui, Fostering linguistic decision-making under uncertainty: a proportional interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on Hamacher aggregation operators and andness optimization models, Inf. Sci. 500 (2019), 229–258
B.S. Ahn, Preference relation approach for obtaining OWA operators weights, Inf. Sci. 47 (2008), 166–178
G. Beliakov, Aggregation functions from data using linear programming, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160 (2009), 65–75
G. Beliakov, S. James, D.G. Nimmo, Using aggregation functions to model human judgements of species diversity, Inf. Sci. 306 (2015), 21–33
T. Calvo, G. Beliakov, Identification of weights in aggregation operators, in: H. Bustince, F. Herrera, J. Montero (Eds.), Fuzzy Sets and Their Extensions: Representation, Aggregation and Models, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 145–162.
D. Filev, R.R. Yager, On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 94 (1998), 157–169
Z.-S. Chen, K.-S. Chin, L. Martinez, K.-L. Tsui, Customizing semantics for individuals with attitudinal HFLTS possibility distributions, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 26 (2018), 3452–3466
O. Reimann, C. Schumacher, R. Vetschera, How well does the OWA operator represent real preferences? Eur. J. Oper. Res. 258 (2017), 993–1003
Z.-S. Chen, C. Yu, K.-S. Chin, L. Martínez, An enhanced ordered weighted averaging operators generation algorithm with applications for multicriteria decision making, Appl. Math. Model. 71 (2019), 467–490
Z.-S. Chen, L. Martínez, K.-S. Chin, K.-L. Tsui, Two-stage aggregation paradigm for HFLTS possibility distributions: a hierarchical clustering perspective, Expert Syst. Appl. 104 (2018), 43–66
B. Dutta, D. Guh, Partitioned Bonferroni mean based on linguistic 2-tuple for dealing with multi-attribute group decision making, Appl. Soft Comput. 37 (2015), 166–179
G. Choquet, Theory of capacities, Ann. de l’institut Fourier. 5 (1954), 131–295
R.R. Yager, The power average operator, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 31 (2001), 724–731
C. Bonferroni, Sulle medie multiple di potenze, Bollettino dell’Unione Matematica Italiana. 5 (1950), 267–270
B. Dutta, D. Guh, R. Mesiar, A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with heterogeneous relationship among attributes in multi-expert decision making, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23 (2014), 1817–1831
R. Sadiq, S. Tesfamariam, Probability density functions based weights for ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operators: an example of water quality indices, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 182 (2007), 1350–1368
G. Beliakov, S. James, R. Mesiar, A generalization of the Bonferroni mean based on partitions, in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), IEEE, Hyderabad, 2013, pp. 1–6.
L. Sun, H. Dong, A.X. Liu, Aggregation functions considering criteria interrelationships in fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: state-of-the-art, IEEE Access. 6 (2018), 68104–68136
Z.-S. Chen, K.-S. Chi, K.L. Tsui, Constructing the geometric Bonferroni mean from the generalized Bonferroni mean with several extensions to linguistic 2-tuples for decision-making, Appl. Soft Comput. 78 (2019), 595–613
K. Ishii, M. Sugeno, A model of human evaluation process using fuzzy measure, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 22 (1985), 19–38
M. Grabisch, The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 89 (1996), 445–456
C. Tan, X. Chen, Intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator for multi-criteria decision making, Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2010), 149–157
D. Yu, Y. Wu, Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Heronian mean operators and their application in multi-criteria decision making, Afr. J. Bus. Manage. 6 (2012), 4158–4168
C. Maclaurin, A second letter to martin folkes, esq.; concerning the roots of equations, with the demonstartion of other rules in algebra, phil, Transactions. 36 (1729), 59–96
G. Wei, M. Lu, Pythagorean fuzzy maclaurin symmetric mean operators in multiple attribute decision making, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33 (2018), 1043–1070
J. Qin, X. Liu, 2-tuple linguistic Muirhead mean operators for multiple attribute group decision making and its application to supplier selection, Kybernetes. 45 (2016), 2–29
J. Renaud, E. Levrat, C. Fonteix, Weights determination of OWA operators by parametric identification, Math. Comput. Simul. 77 (2008), 499–511
V. Torra, On the learning of weights in some aggregation operators: the weighted mean and OWA operators, Math. Soft Comput. 6 (1999), 249–265
S. Kumar, B.K. Tripathi, On the learning machine with compensatory aggregation based neurons in quaternionic domain, J. Comput. Design Eng. 6 (2019), 33–48
M. Grabisch, I. Kojadinovic, P. Meyer, A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: applications of the kappalab r package, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 186 (2008), 766–785
G. Beliakov, Monotone approximation of aggregation operators using least squares splines, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 10 (2002), 659–676
S. Angilella, S. Greco, F. Lamantia, B. Matarazzo, Assessing non-additive utility for multicriteria decision aid, Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2004), 734–744.
G. Beliakov, R. Mesiar, L. Valaskova, Fitting generated aggregation operators to empirical data, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 12 (2004), 219–236
Y. Narukawa, V. Torra, Fuzzy measure and probability distributions: distorted probabilities, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 13 (2005), 617–629
G. Beliakov, M. Gagolewski, S. James, S. Pace, N. Pastorello, E. Thilliez, R. Vasa, Measuring traffic congestion: an approach based on learning weighted inequality, spread and aggregation indices from comparison data, Appl. Soft Comput. 67 (2018), 910–919
Y. Shepetukha, D. Olson, Comparative analysis of multiattribute techniques based on cardinal and ordinal inputs, Math. Comput. Model. 34 (2001), 229–241
P. Bloomfield, W.L. Steiger, Least Absolute Deviations: Theory, Applications and Algorithms, Springer, Boston, 1983.
R. Fullér, P. Majlender, On obtaining minimal variability OWA operator weights, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 136 (2003), 203–215
R. Fullér, P. Majlender, An analytic approach for obtaining maximal entropy OWA operator weights, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 124 (2001), 53–57
J. Jiang, J. Xie, C. Zhao, J. Su, Y. Guan, Q. Yu, Max-margin weight learning for medical knowledge network, Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 156 (2018), 179–190
B. Geng, X. Zhou, J. Zhu, Y. Hung, S.T. Wong, Comparison of reversible-jump markov-chain-monte-carlo learning approach with other methods for missing enzyme identification, J. Biomed. Inform. 41 (2008), 272–281
T. Khot, S. Natarajan, K. Kersting, J. Shavlik, Gradient-based boosting for statistical relational learning: the Markov logic network and missing data cases, Mach. Learn. 100 (2015), 75–100
W. Edwards, How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking, IEEE Trans. Syst Man Cybern. 7 (1977), 326–340
T. Solymosi, J. Dombi, A method for determining the weights of criteria: the centralized weights, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 26 (1986), 35–41
L. Mikhailov, Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements, Fuzzy Sets Syst. (2003), 365–385.
P. Salminen, P. Korhonen, J. Wallenius, Testing the form of a decision-maker’s multiattribute value function based on pair-wise preference information, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 40 (1989), 299–302
G. Beliakov, S. James, Using linear programming for weights identification of generalized Bonferroni means in R, in International Conference on Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 35–44.
M. Grabisch, J.-L. Marichal, R. Mesiar, E. Pap, Aggregation Functions, vol. 127, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge , England, 2009.
D. Dubois, H. Prade, On the use of aggregation operations in information fusion processes, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 142 (2004), 143–161
M. Grabisch, J.-L. Marichal, R. Mesiar, E. Pap, Aggregation functions: Construction methods, conjunctive, disjunctive and mixed classes, Inf. Sci. 181 (2011), 23–43
C.L. Hwang, K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making-Method and Applications, A State-of-the-Art Survey, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1981.
S.-Y. Chou, Y.-H. Chang, C.-Y. Shen, A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 189 (2008), 132–145
D. Paternain, J. Fernández, H. Bustince, R. Mesiar, G. Beliakov, Construction of image reduction operators using averaging aggregation functions, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 261 (2015), 87–111
D. Paternain, H. Bustince, J. Fernández, G. Beliakov, R. Mesiar, Some averaging functions in image reduction, in: N. García-Pedrajas, F. Herrera, C. Fyfe, J.M. Benítez, M. Ali (Eds.), International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 399–408.
G. Bordogna, M. Boschetti, A. Brivio, P. Carrara, M. Pagani, D. Stroppiana, Fusion strategies based on the OWA operator in environmental applications, in: R.R. Yager, J. Kacprzyk, G. Beliakov (Eds.), Recent Developments in the Orderd Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Practice, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 189–207.
M. Fedrizzi, M. Fedrizzi, M. Brunelli, OWA-based fuzzy m-ary adjacency relations in social network analysis, Technical Report, University of Trento, Trento, 2009.
R.R. Yager, On generalized Bonferroni mean operators for multi-criteria aggregation, Int. J. Approx. Reason. 50 (2009), 1279–1286
G. Beliakov, S. James, J. Mordelová, T. Rückschlossová, R.R. Yager, Generalized Bonferroni mean operators in multi-criteria aggregation, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 161 (2010), 2227–2242
S.-H. Xiong, Z.-S. Chen, J.-P. Chang, K.-S. Chin, On extended power average operators for decision-making: a case study in emergency response plan selection of civil aviation, Comput. Ind. Eng. 130 (2019), 258–271
Y. Yang, Z.-S. Chen, Y.-H.Chen, K.-S. Chin, Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy Frank power aggregation operators based on an isomorphic Frank dual triple, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 11 (2018), 1091–1110
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, ZS., Zhang, X., Rodríguez, R.M. et al. Heterogeneous Interrelationships among Attributes in Multi-Attribute Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis. Int J Comput Intell Syst 12, 984–997 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.190827.001
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.190827.001