Pendebatan tenaga nuklear

Pendebatan tenaga nuklear adalah mengenai kontroversi^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5] yang telah menyelubungi penempatan dan penggunaan reaktor nuklear bagi menjana kuasa elektrik dari bahan bakar nuklear untuk kegunaan awam. Perbahasan mengenai kuasa nuklear yang memuncak pada tahun 1970-an dan 1980-an, apabila ia "mencapai intensiti yang belum pernah berlaku dalam sejarah kontroversi teknologi", di sesetengah negara.^[6]^[7]

Penyokong tenaga nuklear berhujah bahawa tenaga nuklear ialah sebuah sumber tenaga lestari yang mengurangkan pencemaran karbon dan boleh meningkatkan keselamatan tenaga jika penggunaannya meggantikan pergantungan kepada bahan api yang diimport.^[8] Penyokong juga menyatakan tanggapan bahawa kuasa nuklear boleh dikatakan tidak menghasilkan pencemaran udara. Berbeza dengan alternatif berdaya utama bahan api fosil. Penyokong juga percaya bahawa kuasa nuklear adalah satu-satunya yang berdaya maju untuk mencapai tenaga bebas untuk kebanyakan negara barat. Mereka menekankan bahawa risiko sisa penyimpanan kecil dan dapat dikurangkan lagi dengan menggunakan teknologi terkini dalam reaktor baru, dan rekod keselamatan operasi di dunia Barat adalah sangat baik jika dibandingkan dengan jenis utama yang lain loji janakuasa.^[9]

Penentang berkata bahawa kuasa nuklear menimbulkan ancaman kepada orang awam dan alam sekitar. Ancaman ini termasuk risiko kesihatan dan kerosakan alam sekitar daripada pemprosesan dan pengangkutan perlombongan uranium, dan risiko atau sabotaj pembiakan senjata nuklear, dan masalah tidak dapat diselesaikan daripada radioaktif sisa nuklear.^[10]^[11]^[12]

Notakaki

^ Martin Fackler (June 1, 2011). "Report Finds Japan Underestimated Tsunami Danger". New York Times.
^ MacKenzie, James J. (December 1977). "Review of The Nuclear Power Controversy] by Arthur W. Murphy". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 52 (4): 467–8. doi:10.1086/410301. JSTOR 2823429.
^ Walker, J. Samuel (10 January 2006). Three Mile Island: A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective. University of California Press. m/s. 10–11. ISBN 9780520246836.
^ In February 2010 the nuclear power debate played out on the pages of the New York Times, see A Reasonable Bet on Nuclear Power and Revisiting Nuclear Power: A Debate and A Comeback for Nuclear Power?
^ In July 2010 the nuclear power debate again played out on the pages of the New York Times, see We’re Not Ready Nuclear Energy: The Safety Issues
^ Kitschelt, Herbert P. (1986). "Political Opportunity and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies" (PDF). British Journal of Political Science. 16 (1): 57. doi:10.1017/S000712340000380X.
^ Jim Falk (1982). Global Fission: The Battle Over Nuclear Power, Oxford University Press.
^ U.S. Energy Legislation May Be `Renaissance' for Nuclear Power.
^ Bernard Cohen. "The Nuclear Energy Option". Dicapai pada 2009-12-09.
^ "Nuclear Energy is not a New Clear Resource". Theworldreporter.com. 2010-09-02.
^ Greenpeace International and European Renewable Energy Council (January 2007). Energy Revolution: A Sustainable World Energy Outlook Diarkibkan 2009-08-06 di Wayback Machine, p. 7.
^ Giugni, Marco (2004). Social protest and policy change: ecology, antinuclear, and peace movements in comparative perspective. Rowman & Littlefield. m/s. 44–. ISBN 9780742518278.

Rencana ini ialah rencana tunas. Anda boleh membantu Wikipedia dengan mengembangkannya.

Jika anda melihat rencana yang menggunakan templat {{tunas}} ini, gantikanlah dengan templat tunas yang lebih spesifik.

[1] Martin Fackler (June 1, 2011). "Report Finds Japan Underestimated Tsunami Danger". New York Times.

[2] MacKenzie, James J. (December 1977). "Review of The Nuclear Power Controversy] by Arthur W. Murphy". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 52 (4): 467–8. doi:10.1086/410301. JSTOR 2823429.

[eleven-3] Walker, J. Samuel (10 January 2006). Three Mile Island: A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective. University of California Press. m/s. 10–11. ISBN 9780520246836.

[4] In February 2010 the nuclear power debate played out on the pages of the New York Times, see A Reasonable Bet on Nuclear Power and Revisiting Nuclear Power: A Debate and A Comeback for Nuclear Power?

[5] In July 2010 the nuclear power debate again played out on the pages of the New York Times, see We’re Not Ready Nuclear Energy: The Safety Issues

[6] Kitschelt, Herbert P. (1986). "Political Opportunity and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies" (PDF). British Journal of Political Science. 16 (1): 57. doi:10.1017/S000712340000380X.

[7] Jim Falk (1982). Global Fission: The Battle Over Nuclear Power, Oxford University Press.

[8] U.S. Energy Legislation May Be `Renaissance' for Nuclear Power.

[9] Bernard Cohen. "The Nuclear Energy Option". Dicapai pada 2009-12-09.

[10] "Nuclear Energy is not a New Clear Resource". Theworldreporter.com. 2010-09-02.

[gierec-11] Greenpeace International and European Renewable Energy Council (January 2007). Energy Revolution: A Sustainable World Energy Outlook Diarkibkan 2009-08-06 di Wayback Machine, p. 7.

[protest-12] Giugni, Marco (2004). Social protest and policy change: ecology, antinuclear, and peace movements in comparative perspective. Rowman & Littlefield. m/s. 44–. ISBN 9780742518278.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]