Dyskusja:Nukleony

Sformułowanie "wspólna nazwa dla protonu i neutron" jest niejednoznaczne:

"Wspólna" to znaczy jak:

1. Proton i neutron razem jako para (i tylko wtedy?) to jest jeden nukleon ?

czy inaczej:

2. już sam pojedynczy proton osobno to nukleon (jak i pojedynczy neutron to drugi nukleon) a razem proton i neutron to dwa nukleony ?

Opis, wyjaśnienie powinno unikać dwuznaczności, aby każdy laik mógł je jednoznacznie zrozumieć i co do semantyki miał pewność.

Inside nucleons with proof

""PHYSICS BREAKTHROUGH"" Easy proof for model works over calculation of no charge not eliptic neutron radius from mass difference to proton. (all needed in WP and eternal right) Inside neutron are only shells of electron positron rotator pairs and outer rotator is defining radius. After electron away and positron in center with normal before relativistic mass it is a proton. 2 * relativistic mass-normal mass=mass difference and relativistic mass set into coulomb(+gravity) = centripetal force equation leads to radius fully right a little less than measured. Particle zoo is just other rotator systems with different shell numbers, radius and shell spins with shell gaps from el. mg. fields near without load sum and outer posi-electron rotating around multiple nucleons is strong force. Ask CERN about what was really prooved or calculate ! Quark theory cannot explain much and near nothing was really prooved already including higgs fields mass, gravitron or string theory etc.