User talk:Ternera

Welcome

Hello, Ternera, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes.

You may want to begin by reading these pages:

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested pages or the list of wanted pages.

You can change any pages you want! Any changes you make can be seen right away. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. At the end of your messages on talk pages, please sign your name by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will show your username and the date.

If you need help just click here and type {{helpme}} and your question and someone will reply to you shortly.

Good luck and happy changing! – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 21:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, Ternera. When you revert a user's changes, like you did earlier, don't forget to leave the user a message on their talk page, especially when reverting vandalism or a test edit. You may find Template:User talk page warnings/table useful when doing this, to let them know that the change was considered inappropriate, and to direct them to the sandbox. Thank you. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 01:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editor experience invitation

Hi :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined

Hi! Some things, like Talk:Arkansas, don't need QDing and instead just need to be fixed. Thanks, Astera🪻 ^talk ^edits 18:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be better to blank the page instead of deleting it and starting over? Ternera (talk) 18:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it could be better that way. Sometimes, there are easier options. Astera🪻 ^talk ^edits 18:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For your hard work and good edits! Thetree284 (talk) 21:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar 2

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For your helpful edits and good editor! Thetree284 (talk) 22:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vanilla software

On vanilla software, the original reference was definitely bad, but you replaced it with a reference that doesn't even mention the term at all. (In any case, I'm going to nominate the article for deletion). Batrachoseps (talk) 18:36, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Batrachoseps. Hmm, I replaced it with the reference that is used at enwiki. I do agree that reference I added is not much better than the previous one though. Since there is an article about the topic on enwiki, I do feel that it could be improved here to the point that it could be kept. Ternera (talk) 18:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why enwiki uses that ref as it's completely useless for this subject. I'm not sure why the article there exists either, as it just seems like a definition. But if you really want, you can change the simple article to be more like that. The current simple article is called vanilla software but is really about modding, and it's full of unnecessary LLM padding. Batrachoseps (talk) 18:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment, I am not interested in modifying the article to look like the one on enwiki. Maybe it would just be a better idea for you to do a RFD and see if someone else steps in to improve it. Ternera (talk) 18:48, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstarǃ

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For always beating me in vandalism revertingǃ Happy editing ✧◝(⁰▿⁰)◜✧ Aster🪻 ^talk ^edits 14:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]