Property talk:P574

Documentation

• Start a query
• Properties using this qualifier (statistics)
• Count

year of publication of scientific name for taxon
year when this taxon was formally described (for animals); year when this taxon name was formally established (for plants)

Description	publication date of this scientific name
Data type	Point in time
Domain	According to this template: taxon According to statements in the property: taxon (Q16521) When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed values	1753 ≤ 𝓧 ≤ unknown
Example	Pyrus (Q434) → 1753 lion (Q140) → 1758
Robot and gadget jobs	DeltaBot does the following jobs: Move source to qualifier
Tracking: usage	Category:Pages using Wikidata property P574 (Q26698286)
See also	taxon author (P405)
Lists	Most recently created items Items with novalue claims Items with unknown value claims Usage history (total) Usage history (main statement) Future dates Dates in Gregorian calendar before 1582 Dates before year 1 (Help:Dates#Years BC) Date on January 1 (Help:Dates#January 1 as date) Database reports/Constraint violations/P574
Proposal discussion	Proposal discussion
Current uses	Total 1,297,119 Main statement 1 <0.1% of uses Qualifier 1,297,076 >99.9% of uses Reference 42 <0.1% of uses

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]

Scope is as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P574#Scope, SPARQL

Range from “+1753-00-00T00:00:00Z” to “now”: values should be in the range from “+1753-00-00T00:00:00Z” to “now”. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P574#Range

Type “taxon (Q16521)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “taxon (Q16521)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P574#Type Q16521, SPARQL

Item “taxon name (P225)”: Items with this property should also have “taxon name (P225)”. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P574#Item P225, SPARQL

Item “parent taxon (P171)”: Items with this property should also have “parent taxon (P171)”. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P574#Item P171, SPARQL

Item “taxon rank (P105)”: Items with this property should also have “taxon rank (P105)”. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P574#Item P105, SPARQL

This property is being used by: nowiki - no:Module:Autorår wikidata - Module:Taxobox bg:Шаблон:Authority ig:Àtụ:Automatic taxobox/authority, ig:Templeeti:Automatic taxobox/authority Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

de

All languages contains "describing" in label and/or description except de. Are you sure that you will not do wrong statements with that? Infovarius (talk) 16:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

The taxon name Cactus ficus-indica was first published in 1753. 1768 it got the new taxon name Opuntia ficus-indica. The english description „publication date of the first scientific description“ is clearly misleading. --Succu (talk) 17:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Date when taxon was discovered (de: veröffentlicht, isn't it?) isn't appropriate at all in these cases. Infovarius (talk) 18:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

No. There could be a great gap between the discovery of a taxon and it's first (valid) published description. A new combination, a name at new rank, or replacement name for a taxon has its own publishing date and is not the first scientific description. --Succu (talk) 18:29, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

So I'm confused about real meaning of this property. Can you put clear and equal meanings in de and en descriptions please? Infovarius (talk) 05:59, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

And almost surely, it was first described well before 1753. It is all about the publication date. - Brya (talk) 10:57, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Sure, see Hortus Cliffortianus. --Succu (talk) 11:28, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes, and that is only the first description by Linnaeus! He there refers to three earlier descriptions ... - Brya (talk) 16:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

oneof-constraint

the oneof-constraint is for items, not for dates. i removed it. --Akkakk 18:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Publication date and date of publication

As there is P577 "date of publication" the name "publication date" is misleading. I changed to "date of taxon name publication" to match the other properties that have "data of ...". Andrea Shan (talk) 07:17, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Taxon publication

Would it not be a good idea to have a property "taxon publication", which could link directly to the item for the article/publication describing a taxon? Publication date could be inferred through that relationship. --Azertus (talk) 23:19, 15 August 2023 (UTC)