Wikidata:Property proposal/Acknowledgments
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Acknowledged
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
| Description | persons or institutions acknoledged on a creative work |
|---|---|
| Represents | acknowledgment (Q4674287) |
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | mainly human (Q5), sometimes organization (Q43229) too |
| Example 1 | Le Club de l'horloge (1974-2002) (Q47020660) → Claude Dargent (Q33110383), Yvan Blot (Q3573330), Jean-Yves Le Gallou (Q3170166) (etc.) |
| Example 2 | On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies (Q3020388) → Michele Besso (Q124446) |
| Example 3 | Les Réseaux du Parti socialiste (Q65947956) → Michel Offerlé (Q3310480) |
| Example 4 | Théorie des jeux et apprentissage pour les réseaux sans fil distribués (Q65964345) → Thomas Lafforgue (Q65964323) |
| See also | dedicated to (P825), cites work (P2860) |
| Proposed by | Nomen ad hoc |
Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:15, 26 July 2019 (UTC).
Support. OK. Even if the list can sometimes be super long in American books. Thierry Caro (talk) 19:22, 26 July 2019 (UTC)- Support David (talk) 07:10, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment English label should probably be "acknowledged" or "acknowledges" (each statement would have a single value, not multiple, and verb form indicates relation)? ArthurPSmith (talk) 14:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed, seems correct. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 14:53, 29 July 2019 (UTC).
- Edit : I would prefer "acknoledged", which I find more clear. The "acknoledger" (?) is the author himself, not the work, so stricto sensu the latter cannot really "acknoledge" anyone... Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC).
- Indeed, seems correct. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 14:53, 29 July 2019 (UTC).
- Support if appropriately rephrased. StudiesWorld (talk) 15:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- Now done. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 15:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC).
Question Are we really going to fill this in for any more than a tiny fraction of potential items it could be used on? Is our data on this ever going to be comprehensive enough to be worth searching? Jheald (talk) 21:48, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Jheald: it seems that there have been previous efforts on this: en:Acknowledgment index. About our data being comprehensive enough, that is a problem with Wikicite as a whole I would say. − Pintoch (talk) 13:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Nomen ad hoc, Thierry Caro, ArthurPSmith, StudiesWorld, Jheald: 
Done: acknowledged (P7137). − Pintoch (talk) 07:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)