Wikidata:Property proposal/synonymer.se Swedish synonym ID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
synonymer.se Swedish synonym ID
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Lexemes
| Description | external identifier for synonymer.se |
|---|---|
| Data type | External identifier |
| Allowed values | .+ ([a-öA-Ö-] = all Swedish letters plus "-") |
| Example 1 | svepa (L237786) → svepa |
| Example 2 | dö (L38589) → dö |
| Example 3 | döda (L38628) → döda |
| Planned use | download all their words and link from our lexemes |
| Formatter URL | https://www.synonymer.se/sv-syn/$1 |
Motivation
[edit]This page uses the word as an identifier. It seems like a good source for us to link to.--So9q (talk) 09:17, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]
CommentThis website only exposes a single url for homograph lexemes. Do we have a good way to handle that? Example: The page damm discusses both damm (L36140) and damm (L408233). Belteshassar (talk) 11:17, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's not really an identifier for a lexeme, since each page on synonymer.se can contain several lexemes. Rather it seems to be a common identifier for a group of lexemes. Ainali (talk) 20:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Belteshassar, ainali:Oh, I did not see that. Hm. Interesting that they choose to "mix pears and apples". Is this a problem that blocks this property? Can we just link to it from multiple lexemes?--So9q (talk) 06:14, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think it is blocking it per se, but perhaps it is another type than external identifier since it doesn't really do that? Ainali (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Here is an idea. Instead of creating this property, you could immediately start using this with described by source (P1343), which could be qualified with described at URL (P973). Ainali (talk) 14:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- I notice the proposal identifier shared with lexeme on this page which seems to be proposed just for these situations. So perhaps this is good as it is anyway? Ainali (talk) 14:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- Answering myself, I'll support this as soon as Wikidata:Property proposal/identifier shared with lexeme is approved. Ainali (talk)
- I notice the proposal identifier shared with lexeme on this page which seems to be proposed just for these situations. So perhaps this is good as it is anyway? Ainali (talk) 14:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- Here is an idea. Instead of creating this property, you could immediately start using this with described by source (P1343), which could be qualified with described at URL (P973). Ainali (talk) 14:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think it is blocking it per se, but perhaps it is another type than external identifier since it doesn't really do that? Ainali (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Belteshassar, ainali:Oh, I did not see that. Hm. Interesting that they choose to "mix pears and apples". Is this a problem that blocks this property? Can we just link to it from multiple lexemes?--So9q (talk) 06:14, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Ainali (talk) 12:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- @So9q, Belteshassar, Ainali:
Done --Emu (talk) 11:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Property:P9577 (for findability). Ainali (talk) 12:41, 15 May 2021 (UTC)