User contributions for Njugan

20 July 2020

• 15:1815:18, 20 July 2020 diff hist +8 Ivar Vidfamne Ivar is another Vendel Era semi-legendary Swedish King.

3 April 2020

• 08:4208:42, 3 April 2020 diff hist +13 Agne Grammatical corrections (preposition changers) and one add on of moreover, were made in the sentence after the dating of Agnafit.

2 April 2020

• 23:0523:05, 2 April 2020 diff hist +109 Agne Added more in to prove that he is semi-mythic.
• 17:5617:56, 2 April 2020 diff hist +5 Agne King Agne has been linked to Agnafit because of the corresponding dates of the kings' burial. Also, his story is a little less mythic in the sagas, so as of now, it might be safe to regard him as semi-mythological

24 March 2020

• 03:1803:18, 24 March 2020 diff hist +1 Ingjald Forgot to put a space between the comma and his
• 03:1603:16, 24 March 2020 diff hist +120 Ingjald Thought that it would be logically sound to discuss his existence as a historical person when introducing Ingjald, so "Historicity" has been changed to "Archaeological Evidence".

22 March 2020

• 19:1419:14, 22 March 2020 diff hist +48 Randver Just like many figures in Norse sagas, we only have oral evidence of such a ruler by name, so he is of disputed historicity as of 2020. However, he may very well parallel to a person mentioned in Widsith
• 19:1019:10, 22 March 2020 diff hist +48 Gudrød the Hunter If Gudrød the Hunter existed, he may have ruled in the ninth century
• 19:0719:07, 22 March 2020 diff hist +48 Algaut Just like many figures in Ynglinga Saga and other sagas, we only have oral evidence of such a ruler by name, so he is of disputed historicity as of 2020.
• 19:0419:04, 22 March 2020 diff hist +48 Eysteinn Just like his family, we only have oral evidence of such a ruler by name, so he is of disputed historicity as of 2020.
• 19:0219:02, 22 March 2020 diff hist +49 Ongentheow Ongentheow (Egil) may have been historical because of accurate archaeological evidence that coincides with the information regarding him in Anglo-Saxon and Scandinavian sources or sagas. However, the dating was possibly the early sixth century when he lived and we only have oral evidence of such a ruler by name, so he is of disputed historicity as of 2020.
• 18:5918:59, 22 March 2020 diff hist +48 Onela Onela, is another Vendel Era Swedish king who is of uncertain historicity, so he is under "People Whose existence is disputed".
• 18:5818:58, 22 March 2020 diff hist +48 Yrsa Yrsa is another personage who belongs with the category "People whose existence is disputed" because of having mention in multiple semi-historic sections of Norse Sagas. She may also be mentioned in Beowulf
• 18:5418:54, 22 March 2020 diff hist +9 Harald Wartooth Forgot to put Category:People whose existence is disputed. This goes along with previous edit, which is: Harald Wartooth is more on historic ground because of possibly being identical to a King Harald who is mentioned on Frankish Sources, so this personage of Harald Wartooth is more in the domain of being semi-legendary, but still belongs in the category of "People whose existence is disputed"
• 18:5318:53, 22 March 2020 diff hist +39 Harald Wartooth Harald Wartooth is more on historic ground because of possibly being identical to a King Harald who is mentioned on Frankish Sources, so this personage of Harald Wartooth is more in the domain of being semi-legendary, but still belongs in the category of "People whose existence is disputed"
• 18:4818:48, 22 March 2020 diff hist +48 Healfdene Halfdan Scylding is another personage who may be based on a real person, so he therefore belongs with the category "People whose existence is disputed"
• 18:4218:42, 22 March 2020 diff hist +48 Olof Björnsson Olof Björnsson is more on historic ground because of having mention in saga literature that wasn't written long after his rule, so he is semi-legendary , but still is another "King of Sweden" who belongs with the category "People whose existence is disputed"
• 18:3518:35, 22 March 2020 diff hist +48 Styrbjörn the Strong Styrbjörn the Strong has a question mark on whether or not he was historical, due to appearing mainly in non-contemporary, semi-historical Norse Sagas. The article even says at the moment as of sand before this edit was made, "doubts have been cast on his existence,". Therefore, it is proper to put him in the category of "People whose existence is disputed"
• 18:2618:26, 22 March 2020 diff hist +31 Hrothgar Hrothgar is more on historic ground, so he is semi-legendary, but still is another personage who belongs with the category "People whose existence is disputed"

22 February 2020

• 05:5805:58, 22 February 2020 diff hist +48 Ingvar Ingvar would be more of a semi-legendary personage from Norse Literature, who is orally preserved in texts that each date hundreds of years after his supposed at rest. Therefore, his actual existence is disputed.

15 February 2020

• 05:3705:37, 15 February 2020 diff hist −40 Eric Anundsson Didn't realize that I would violate article with putting "People whose existence is disputed" at the bottom of the page
• 05:3505:35, 15 February 2020 diff hist +1 Eric Anundsson No edit summary
• 05:3405:34, 15 February 2020 diff hist 0 Eric Anundsson No edit summary
• 05:3405:34, 15 February 2020 diff hist +39 Eric Anundsson This King Erik is mentioned in Scandinavian sources with Harald Fairhair that only have manuscripts that date from the thirteenth century at the earliest. Although these sources are from this time, some contain poems that are said to have been transmitted orally from the ninth and tenth centuries. However, oral tradition can get mixed in over centuries with new cultural ways, ideas, or beliefs. At least we can regard the accounts of this king semi-historical.
• 02:1802:18, 15 February 2020 diff hist −44 Ivar Vidfamne Ivar is of a less mythical nature than his ancestors, so he is semi-legendary.
• 02:1502:15, 15 February 2020 diff hist +5 Hrólfr Kraki Hrólfr Kraki would be more of a semi-legendary figure.
• 02:1302:13, 15 February 2020 diff hist +48 Hrólfr Kraki Hrólfr Kraki is another personage who belongs with the category "People whose existence is disputed"
• 02:0802:08, 15 February 2020 diff hist 0 Eadgils Category misspelling of Category:People whose existence is disputed
• 02:0702:07, 15 February 2020 diff hist +48 Eadgils Eadgils, is another Vendel Era Swedish king who is of uncertain historicity, so he is under "People Whose existence is disputed".

14 February 2020

• 23:5123:51, 14 February 2020 diff hist +173 Aun His description in Heimskringla is mostly mythological, but a supernatural life and different reigns indicate cultural tales of longevity from an actual individual.
• 23:4323:43, 14 February 2020 diff hist +49 Ohthere Ohthere (Ottar) May have been historical because of concrete archaeological evidence that corroborates with the information regarding him in Anglo-Saxon and Scandinavian sources or sagas. However, the dating was possibly the sixth century when he lived and we only have oral evidence of such a ruler by name, so he is of disputed historicity as of 2020.
• 23:2923:29, 14 February 2020 diff hist +48 Anund Like Ingjald, King Anund is of disputed historicity because archaeology for him is somewhat scant and he is mentioned in many medieval historiographical sources that not only date hundreds of years after his possible historical lifetime, but that describe the same person..

7 February 2020

• 01:3501:35, 7 February 2020 diff hist +48 Ivar Vidfamne Since this King Ivar is mentioned in multiple saga sources, he is still of disputed existence.

6 February 2020

• 02:0402:04, 6 February 2020 diff hist +7 Ingjald No edit summary
• 02:0302:03, 6 February 2020 diff hist 0 Ingjald No edit summary
• 01:5801:58, 6 February 2020 diff hist −6 Ingjald No edit summary
• 01:5701:57, 6 February 2020 diff hist −4 Ingjald No edit summary
• 01:5601:56, 6 February 2020 diff hist −6 Ingjald No edit summary
• 01:5501:55, 6 February 2020 diff hist +4 Ingjald Forgot to put 3. Historicity.
• 01:5301:53, 6 February 2020 diff hist −7 Olof Trätälja If Ingjald existed, he may have ruled in the seventh century based on saga chronology that is backed up with archaeology (Please see the Ingjald page for further reference).
• 01:4401:44, 6 February 2020 diff hist +1,124 Ingjald Hello lovely universal Wikipedia Family that has been a centerpiece for the Internet, I and all who wish credit have been focused on preserving what can be found as a matter of truth. Anyways, the edits are inputting some information of archaeological evidence that pertains to why Ingjald can be considered semi-legendary, otherwise said as a saga figure of half historical value.

7 April 2019

• 17:3317:33, 7 April 2019 diff hist −2,265 List of legendary kings of Denmark Hello lovely universal Wikipedia