Talk:John Shadegg

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) Person(s).

Conservatism

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as High-importance).

Untitled

Removed stuff about DeLay and Abramoff. There has been nothing linking Shadegg to Abramoff, and Shadegg has opposed DeLay on several occasions, most notably the vote over the 2003 Medicare Modernization Act, in which DeLay and the whip team bribed and blackmailed Congressmen in order to get them to switch votes, yet Shadegg stood fast and voted no.

<DesScorp: 1-16-06 1:40 CST> Well, someone put it back in, then, because there's still a blurb about Shadegg returning money to Abramoff. The implication is that Shadegg had shady dealings with him.

I added the "dubious" flag to that statement. Shadegg flatly denied the accusation on Fox News Sunday (1/15/2006). --Aeki 22:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well here is the link (see fr:) http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0112shadegg-donation.html from the Arizona Republic linking about USD 7000 Shadegg received to Abramoff. (:Julien:) 10:44, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The money came from a person linked to Abramoff, not Abramoff himself. [1] Savantpol 02:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did Abramoff personally give money to anyone? Even legal dealings run through channels, the information should be in the article, it's significant.98.165.70.153 (talk) 10:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In two different places on the page different people are listed as his predecessor - at the bottom Bob Stump is listed. In the box at the top right John Kyl is listed. I'm not sure which is correct but someone who knows should fix this. Plymouths 00:11, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused public domain image

Here is an orphaned public domain image: Image:John Shadegg.jpg --Strangerer (Talk) 22:16, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Puff piece

Does anyone get the sense that Shadegg's staff wrote the article? This article reads like a puff piece. --JHP (talk) 04:35, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to suggest the opposite.. There are lines in here like "used his granddaughter as a prop" that seem as if the writer was trying to push a point of view against him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.192.104.13 (talk) 20:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Religion?

I just looked at the article and happened to notice that the article text lists the Congressman as Episcopalian but the info box suggests that he is a Mormon (although the info box links to the dab page LDS. Anyone have the correct info? --JohnPomeranz (talk) 22:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. This appears to have been part of a bit of vandalism by an unregistered user. I've corrected it.

--JohnPomeranz (talk) 22:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

free market conservative

Changed free-market conservative to economic conservative owing to the fact that nobody who genuinely believes in a free market can simultaneously be a fascist religious nut opposed to Internet poker. Let's tell the truth about bastards who falsely claim to support civil liberties and free markets! 2008-10-29 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.62.29 (talk) 10:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Shadegg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Shadegg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on John Shadegg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:44, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]