Talk:Peter Carter-Ruck

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 December 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Untitled

The article says: "Carter-Ruck did not speak to his daughter, Julie Scott-Bayfield..." She should hyphenate her maiden name so she could be Julie Carter-Ruck-Scott-Bayfield. Cacophony 23:35, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and if he had hyphenated his full name, she could have been called Julie Frederick-Carter-Ruck-Scott-Bayfield. 87.112.25.116 (talk) 08:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Separate article for Carter-Ruck

I do not think that it is appropriate to discuss the present-day activities of Carter-Ruck, the law firm founded by the subject of this article, given that he retired many years ago and died in 2003. It would be more appropriate to create a separate article for the law firm, as it is manifestly notable, and the subject of multiple independent reliable sources. 08:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

I agree it doesn't seem right to have info about this person's company in an article about them. I'll split it later on. Smartse (talk) 17:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, especially as Peter Carter-Ruck left the firm bearing his surname. I've made a start - hopefully it will make a good basis for a larger article.Autarch (talk) 18:13, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the rest of the info from this page, by the sounds of it there should be plenty of sources about Carter-Ruck out there. Smartse (talk) 20:14, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non notable person article should be deleted

This person is non notable. He's just a lawyer, they are ten a penny. This massages an ego.

delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.46.187 (talk) 01:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have a snowball in hell's chance of deleting PCR on notability grounds, since eminently satisfies WP:N. The article cites good verifiable sources. He has 2 decades or more of non-trivial mentions in Private Eye alone, besides the many other features I've read on him over the years. You can take it to AfD if you like, but as I say you have zero chance of getting a deletion. --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:00, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that PCR should not be deleted, especially given his non-trivial mentions in Private Eye. However the style / title used for his eponymous firm in that magazine should also be included in this page, given that PCR as an individual requested they stop. If I recall correctly there was a Have I Got News For You episode in which Ian Hislop suggested someone should "Carter-Ruck off" - the use of his own name in firm ties (and should tie) the conduct of an eponymous firm to the example set by it's founder. Billse10 (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Peter Carter-Ruck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071223172142/http://www.time.com:80/time/daily/special/diana/readingroom/9697/21296.html to http://www.time.com/time/daily/special/diana/readingroom/9697/21296.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]