Talk:Petrockstowe

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rubens painting

I've removed a long section about a Rubens painting (and image) that has only the most tenuous connection with Petrockstowe. Maybe a brief mention that the painting was once saved from a local fire would be appropriate, but to include a description of it, and the biblical reference on which it is supposedly based, and Swete's description of its provenance and his early morning contemplation of it, and the details of another unrelated painting of the Lord Chancellor, and the correction of the reported details of that painting ... is far too much of a digression from the topic of the article. —SMALL JIM 20:22, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately virtually nothing is recorded about this house, "one of the most imposing ever to exist in Devon" (Lauder). One of the rare sources is Swete, and he chose to write at length about the episode of the Reubens painting. Beggars cannot be choosers. It thus becomes valuable info. Anyway, as I stated I will move the whole block to a new article Heanton Satchville, Petrockstowe. (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 20:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]

The Medieval Cult of St Petroc

Would someone please help me understand what this from Karen Jankulak's The Medieval Cult of St Petroc means:

"According to the earliest existing episcopal register (as of 2000 book), Buckfast abbey possessed the advowson of the churches of both South Brent and Petrockstowe; dissolution records show both temporalia and spiritualia of the abbey in these parishes."

That would be great!--CaroleHenson (talk) 23:57, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Episcop, advowson, Dissolution of the Monasteries, temporalities and spiritualities. Do those help? —SMALL JIM 10:03, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I couldn't find "temporalia" and "spiritualia"

So, if I've got this right: The abbey was supported by tithes and income-producing property (temporalia and spiritulia).

The lord of the manor has the right to nominate the parish priest.

Is that right?--CaroleHenson (talk) 12:19, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. Bishop Bronescombe's and Bishop Quivil's registers state that the Abbey held the right to nominate the priests in those parishes, and at the Dissolution, records show that it was supported by tithes and income from land and property that it owned in those parishes (and no doubt others too). —SMALL JIM 15:21, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thank you!--CaroleHenson (talk) 15:34, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Petrockstowe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://disused-rlys.fotopic.net/c1147820.html
Added archive https://archive.is/20120712040459/http://domesdaymap.co.uk/place/SS5311/heanton-satchville/ to http://domesdaymap.co.uk/place/SS5311/heanton-satchville/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]