Talk:Sarek National Park

Sweden Mid‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Clean up?

This article turned up in my SuggestBot message as being "Unencyclopaedic" and in need of a bit of cleanup. Since it is a mid-importance article, I thought it best to post here first. I can see that the language needs a bit of attention as well as the Wikifying. Does anybody mind if I have a go at this? w.carter-Talk 12:38, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead. I might help you eventually. Lappspira (talk) 15:50, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Working ...it's going to take a while. Please be patient. w.carter-Talk 22:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Lappspira: The reason this is going to take to long to clean up, is that there are some many faults, misspellings, mistakes and whatnots in the article that I have to check everything against other articles and sources. (Remember that this is a translation from a French article, not a Scandinavian, so names and local knowledge are the main issues.) I will deal with each issue as I get to them. Lucky there is no deadline here! Best, w.carter-Talk 07:10, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have made as much cleanup as I can. There may be goofs, typos and other screw-ups that will need further correcting. Please go ahead and correct them. Cheers, w.carter-Talk 12:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the POV tag at The Sami exception section

The tag was placed by an IP that probably did not know that the tag should also be discussed on the talk page. They only left a comment in the edit summery.

However, the IP was right. It was a dead link. The sentence was also faulty in regards to numerous other sources covering the same event. Some of which are now added to the article instead of the dead link. The use of the word "slaughtered" was a remnant of the somewhat faulty translation from the French article where a very "flowery" language was used as opposed to the encyclopedic style recommended for the en-wiki. It did not accurately describe the situation. The wolf had wandered into the area, it had been caught, tagged with a radio transmitter and DNA tested. It was monitored, and when it started to scatter the herds as well a killing several reindeers, attempts were made to scare it away. When the situation got worse, a decision was made by the proper authorities, in cooperation with the Sami, to shoot it according to the criteria for Nuisance wildlife management.

Further, the last part of the section was an unsourced translation from the equally unsourced part of the French article. Since the article was otherwise very well sourced (it is a fr-wiki FA), this addendum stands out like a personal comment from the French editor. Therefore, I have removed that part and replaced it with a sourced, and hopefully neutral enough, section about snowmobiles.

I also substituted "Sami villages" with "Sami communities". The Swedish word sv:Sameby is closer to "corporation" than "settlement".

After making these changes, I removed the tag. If anyone objects to this, please replace it and be sure to start a proper discussion about it here on the talk page. w.carter-Talk 12:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sarek National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]