Template:Did you know nominations/Chinaman (porcelain)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Chinaman (porcelain)

The result was: promoted by Allecher (talk) 3:04 pm, Yesterday (UTC−7)
...And umpromoted by Fram (talk) 2:11 am, Today (UTC−7)

(

)

... ~~that an apprentice chinaman (business card pictured) only earned about £25 a year in the 18th century?~~
...ALT1 that due to the collusion of chinamen (business card pictured) the bulk import of Chinese porcelain to England ceased in 1798?
...ALT2: that chinamen (card pictured) formed a ring at the auctions of the East India Company?

Reviewed: James Chadwick

5x expanded by Colonel Warden (talk). Self nominated at 12:39, 29 April 2013 (UTC).

Good references; no sign of bias. Prose and length is good also. Article was nominated 7 days after expansion of prose began. One suggestion: I think the hook should mention the time period that that wage was common. Otherwise I'd be happy for this to pass immediately. Freikorp (talk) 00:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I have expanded the first hook and provided ALT1 as another option. Warden (talk) 19:51, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Good to go. Freikorp (talk) 11:39, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

I have undone the promotion of this article, and removed it from the queue. The hook is not supported by the article; the hook discusses the wages of an apprentice, the article the wages of a journeyman (which is the stage you reach after you have been an apprentice). (The article should also be edited to make clear which of the Young 1999 sources is meant, as there are two different ones from the same author in that year, but that is a more minor point). Fram (talk) 09:11, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

I have struck the first hook which I didn't much like, myself. ALT1 can now be considered instead. Warden (talk) 09:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

ALT1 needs consideration. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

The source given indicates that the import ceased also in part due to the popularity of English creamware, not just the collusion of chinamen. Perhaps the hook can be rewritten to make this more clear? Fram (talk) 08:05, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Further reading indicates that there were multiple effects operating at this time: the effect of the Napoleonic war on competition, the rise of neoclassicism and a change in import duties, reducing the tariff on tea to 12.5% but raising the tariff on porcelain to 109%. This makes cause and effect too complex so the hook needs simplification. Let's try ALT2. Warden (talk) 10:32, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Reviewer needed for ALT2. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:19, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
ALT2 is fine (i've added touches) Johnbod (talk) 19:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)