User talk:23Uare

what?--23Uare 15:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I created template:Jake Sock block, how is that vandalism?--23Uare 15:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC) {{unblock|some sort of missunderstanding?}}--205.188.116.133 15:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I got confused, I'll request an unblock NawlinWiki 15:10, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thank you--23Uare 15:17, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

You've been unblocked, as it seems you were blocked accidentally. Let me know if there are any more problems, cheers. --Fire Star 火星 15:17, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sure thing, I can understand it must seem odd when someone creates a brand new account and then starts tagging NCV socks, but it looked like there were serveral pages worth of unblocked sockpuppets in the user creation log, so i created the unfortunatly named template Jake Sock block, which probably seemed even more odd--23Uare 15:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging

Please stop tagging Jake Remington accounts that have already been blocked. Thanks. — FireFox ^user_talk 15:23, 01 June '06

Speedy deletion of Template:Jake Sock block

A tag has been placed on Template:Jake Sock block requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]