User talk:2600:1001:B01C:E25C:7D7E:902F:D8E4:4EB3

January 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ICarly (season 1). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Don't change established practice in an article without discussion first. Data precision is an editorial choice and needs consensus to change. Talk:List of iCarly episodes would be the appropriate place to suggest the change and go for consensus. See MOS:STYLEVAR for more. Don't remove hidden notes without a reason stated Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at ICarly (season 2), you may be blocked from editing. Still at it. MOS:STYLEVAR applies, follow it. Add the raw data as a comment if you want to keep it, but do the trivial rounding (WP:CALC or use {{Round}}) to display article's chosen precision. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at ICarly (season 1). Magical Golden Whip (talk) 20:24, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Comment: I’m sorry, but I really don’t know what you’ve been reverting my last few edits and you’re even threatening to block me. My last few edits have not causing any harm to the article whatsoever. I’m simply putting the correct titles of the ratings sources.

Using edit summaries to describe what you are doing heads off a lot of problems. Basically there is nothing wrong with the articles as they are, the changes you made are not obvious improvements, so general response of others is to revert things. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at ICarly (season 2) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.