User talk:Adem/Archive 2

UK Export/Import Data - Economy of the United Kingdom

Hi,

You recently updated the export and import statistical information in the infobox on the Economy of the United Kingdom page. However, you referenced a Statistical UK Trade bulletin PDF from the Office for National Statistics which does not work. Furthermore, you allege the data is the trade data for June 2013 in the citation link, that data has yet to be released yet by the ONS. Could you please amend and clarify that data and its citation. Your contribution is appreciated.

AdamFouracre (talk) 20:49, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adam, I did these updates using data from the CIA World Factbook. I don't know UK trade office statistics or official agency figures. Anyway, the main source of infoboxes is CIA World Factbook and it's is specified. Besides, this is not a data for the year, the results of 2012. Please look at export and import partners of United Kingdom Export: [1] and Import:[2] Maurice 19:57, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Economy of Grenada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to St. George's

Economy of Jamaica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kingston

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I fix it now. Thank you for message and your attention. Maurice 11:16, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of Sierra Leone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cocoa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed disambiguation link of Cocoa on article of Economy of Sierra Leone. Maurice 12:04, 02 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template infobox

Yes Maurice, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey provide the opposition with lethal armaments. No-one else does. Sopher99 (talk) 21:48, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, Russia and China provide weapons to the Assad regime! It's an undeniable fact! Even in this regard, a separate article is available. I stated sources on this issue but likewise, there is no reference about Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar on the template! Maurice07 (talk) 22:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - September 2013

Issue XXXIV	Project Eurovision monthly				Click image below to read full edition

At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows
Total Number of Members	Active Members	Inactive Members	Total Number of Articles	Number of Good Articles	Number of Featured Articles	Require Improvements
74	51	23	4883	16	4	2076
			23			1
To discontinue receiving Eurovision newsletters and mini memorandums, please remove your name from here.

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 11:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ilham Aliyev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lincoln University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heydar Aliyev Order, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Invitation!

	You are cordially invited to join WikiProject Eurovision!
	You appear to be someone that may be interested in joining WikiProject Eurovision. Please accept this formal invitation from a current member of the project. We offer a place for you to connect with users who also like Eurovision and facilitate team work in the development of Eurovision articles.
	If you decide to join the project, please add your name to this list, and add the project talk page to your watchlist.
	I hope you accept! - Wes Mᴥuse 06:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ProjectEurovision Monthly Newsletter - December 2013

Project Eurovision monthly						Issue XXXVII

Click icon to view full edition		Headlines Eurovision Song Contest 2013 achieves Good article status. Malta win the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2013.

At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows
Total Number of Members	Active Members	Inactive Members	Total Number of Articles	Number of Good Articles	Number of FA/FLs	Require Improvements
62	42	20	5086	21	6	1352
6	9	3	99	5	2	24
To discontinue receiving Eurovision newsletters and mini memorandums, please remove your name from here.

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 11:30, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baklava, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. It's solved. Maurice07 (talk) 11:04, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hepsi birbirinden yakışıklı...

Şu kıroların resmini koyup, ne kadar "yakışıklı" bir millet olduğumuzu tanıtmasan diyorum. Anlıyorum, Fenerlisin. Bir gün Avrupa'da kupa kazanırsanız sizin stadın resmini koyarız. Ben Beşiktaşlıyım. 88.251.118.199 (talk) 12:16, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yanılıyorsunuz Herr Bundespanzer! Fenerbahçe takımını tutmuyorum. Galatasaraylıyım. Fakat bunun takım tutmak ile uzaktan yakından bir ilgisi yok. Tarafsız olmak ve milli takımı ön plana çıkarmanın daha uygun olduğunu düşünüyorum. Bu konuda müzakere edebileceğimizi düşünüyorum. Türkiye sayfası kişisel kullanıcı sayfası değil ve empoze etmekte ısrar etmek fazla yarar getirmiyor, bunu bizzat tecrübe ettim.

(in English): You are wrong User:Herr Bundespanzer! I don't keep Fenerbahce football team. I'm fan of Galatasaray. However, it has nothing to do with keeping your team. Being objective and emphasize of national team, more appropriate for me. I think we will be able to negotiate on this issue. Article of Turkey is not a personal user page and insist about to impose does not bring much benefit ,I have personally experienced it. Maurice07 (talk) 12:48, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FB 1907 = Maurice07 85.103.154.15 (talk) 16:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maurice, your user name shouts "FENERBAHÇE" (established in 1907) so please don't lie. 85.107.29.12 (talk) 16:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infer in this way,extremely ridiculous :) Be sure, If I were Fenerbahce fan, I would cahange with Süşrü Saraçoğlu Stadium?? If you wonder number of "07", I can explain. It's just my lucky number. Maurice07 (talk) 16:43, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for two weeks for edit warring

Because of your past blocks for edit warring, and your edit warring actions at Turkey, I have blocked you for two weeks. Please seek alternative methods to dispute resolution in the future rather than simply engaging in edit wars. As always, this block can be appealed through the use of {{unblock}}. only (talk) 16:46, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adem (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been blocked by Only in 24 December 2013 because of edit warring I'm being blocked for two week and this issue connects to the my past blocks !! If there is a violation on page of Turkey, I accept that. If the past blocks taken as the reference, it's unacceptable. Maurice07 (talk) 17:10, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's perfectly acceptable. The duration of a block is commonly set based on the pattern of behavior. I would suggest you focus your unblock request on how you will prevent future edit warring, as the next block will likely be for a longer duration. Kuru (talk) 17:33, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mahidevran

Please see the File talk:Rosne Pranvere.jpg in Commons. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 15:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Largest cities in Turkey

I hope you don't start again with adding the number of inhabitants of the region instead of from the city as you tried last year... The Banner talk 00:38, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Largest cities in Turkey

Seeing that third source you added, you are again confusing regions with cities. The Banner talk 14:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mimar Sinan Bridge

You might be interested in starting this one..♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Largest cities in Turkey edit war report

I declined the report as there is no evidence of 3RR. There needs to be several reverts in a short space of time. Also User:The Banner is correct about the links you are using for the references. I tried them with several different browsers, IE, FF, Chrome and Opera, on three different computers and two different operating systems and they do not work. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 03:39, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Take it to talk. — kwami (talk) 01:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I snapped at you. Too much edit-warring idiocy going on at the moment. See what you think of the article now. — kwami (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Երևանցի ^talk 18:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic non-incident.

The talk discussion was archived. It's called "Hopeless hijack". Weren't a lot of voices, and there might be something you can add that was overlooked. But basically, it only made news because Sochi was a hot topic at the time, and this guy wanted to ride coattails. It's like when a drunk threatens to call the President to get him out of the tank. Not really relevant to the President.

If the plane actually had landed in Sochi, and the guy did anything to affect the Games, it'd be notable. But since there was no effect or connection (aside from the angle of some news stories), it's just tangentially related trivia. At least with the other threats, there was a noted increased security effect. InedibleHulk (talk) 18:28, February 20, 2014 (UTC)

About Mahidevran's image

I don't edit in tr-WP. But I want to point out that when the image in question was first posted in en WP, I had called "BBC your paintings". My message and their response (on Jan 10) are as follows:

"Hi, Happy new year. I wonder if the subject of the painting "portrait of a sultana 101096" is ambiguous or not. If not what was her name ? Thanks. Nedim Ardoğa"

"Thanks very much for your email. I'm afraid we don't have any more information on this painting, other than what is listed on the site."

Obviously the image is totally imaginative and there is no indication of whom the painter might have imagined. Thus I think that the imagine can't be used as an encyclopedic material. Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 17:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AA2 reminder

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Just reminding you about WP:AA2. I found this edit to be rather problematic since the paragraph was actually cited by several sources. I nevertheless hope we can work together to build a bigger and better encyclopedia and have more constructive discussions. Étienne Dolet (talk) 14:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of presidential trips made by Abdullah Gül, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Macedonia and Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Roxelana may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

in the Ottoman Empire''], Oxford University Press US, 1993, ISBN 0-19-508677-5, pp. 58-59.</ref>) was the legal wife and [[haseki sultan]] of [[Suleiman the Magnificent]] and the mother of [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Maurice07! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Marek.69 ^talk 16:43, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish help needed

Hello Maurice, I'm contacting you because we need some Turkish translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on tr.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Turkish Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 22:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tireless Contributor

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your awesome job on [World Tourism Rankings] Thanks a lot. MarcosPassos (talk) 06:58, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much MarcosPassos for the nice gesture. It's a first barnstar for me. As you know, it was a pleasure and honor for me. Take care and thanks again. Maurice 10:42, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sabiha Gökçen picture

Bunun([3]) hakkında neler düşündüklerini belirtecekler, bu sefer 1937'de çekildiğine dair kaynak belirtilmiş. Yarıdımın dokunabilir.KazekageTR (talk) 19:24, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:42, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reported

Reported here: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Maurice07. Thanks, Étienne Dolet (talk) 16:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the current request. Please comment only in your own section and do not suggest that other editors be sanctioned without providing evidence which should be in a new AE request for that editor. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AA2 notification

We appear to have forgotten some paperwork... Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 04:33, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

Topic ban from everything related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related ethnic conflicts anywhere on Wikipedia.

You have been sanctioned per this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:07, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are also placed on notice that if the disruption spreads to another topic area they will be blocked indefinitely as a non-discretionary sanctions (normal admin) action, this warning will be recorded as a final warning at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Final warnings. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:07, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Bahçeşehir University.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Bahçeşehir University.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:46, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013 Rabaa Massacre

Can you please make an RM for Rabaa and Nahda massacre(s) instead of the one you proposed? I recommend you check how the discussion developed since the last time you left, because the new title does not reflect the fact that the events occurred in another sit-in also. I will support. Also, i don't think there is a need to capitalize "massacre" per MOS:CAPS and because the sources rarely do that. Regards. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 17:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Just wanted to let you know that your insertion of the Turkish presidential seals into the infoboxes of the various presidents is against the MOS. It has been decided over various discussions that presidential seals, and similar, are not appropriate for infoboxes. The consensus is they're not really needed, and make an infobox look cluttered. Of course, consensus can change, so feel free to start a discussion at someone like the talk page of the President of Turkey article, if you would like consensus to put the seals back in. Otherwise, I refer you to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons to explain more. Besides that, thanks for the good work clearing up the infoboxes. Redverton (talk) 00:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Presidents of Turkey

Hello. Just wanted to let you know that your insertion of the Turkish presidential seals into the infoboxes of the various presidents is against the MOS. It has been decided over various discussions that presidential seals, and similar, are not appropriate for infoboxes. The consensus is they're not really needed, and make an infobox look cluttered. Of course, consensus can change, so feel free to start a discussion at somewhere like the talk page of the President of Turkey article, if you would like consensus to put the seals back in. Otherwise, I refer you to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons to explain more. Besides that, thanks for the good work clearing up the infoboxes. Redverton (talk) 00:52, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sabiha Gokcen

Merhaba,

Sabiha Gokcen sayfasinda Ermeni kullanicilar ve ozellikle "Etienne_Dolet" isimli kullanici inatla Gokcen'in "origins is disputed" diye yazilmasini surduruyor. Ve bunlarin bu versiyonu kalici versiyon oluyor. Mudahale eden arkadasimada "sockpuppet" her ne demekse dedi bu Etienne isimli kullanici. Talkpage'e bakarken bu sayfa ile ilgilendiginizi gordum, ve yardim istemek istedim. Biz bir iki kisi bu yalani ortadan cikarmaya calisiyoruz ama neredeyse hic tecrubemiz yok bu konularda.

Saygilar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theobjektivist (talk • contribs) 07:55, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merhaba, Bu konuda bir süre önce bir değişiklik savaşı oldu. Sabiha Gökçen'in ermeni olduğu ve bunun madde'de "ihtilaflı" olarak bahsedilmesi konusunda bir ısrar olduğu ve bunun İngilizce Vikipedi'de ermeni kullanıcıların baskısından kaynaklandığı muhakkak. Ben bu konu yasaklı olduğum için bir müdahalede bulunamam. "Sockpuppet" tan maksat, eğer kendi hesabınızdan ayrı, başka bir hesabınız varsa bu kukla olarak kabul edilmekte ve sizin engellenmenize bile sebep olabilmektedir. Ben de bu iddiaları ve dayandığı gazete küpürlerini gülünç ve kabul edilemez buluyorum. Diğer kullanıcılarla iletişim halinde olmanız daha yararlı. Maurice07 (talk) 17:34, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cem Özdemir

Please read WP:BRD. You have been bold. I have reverted. Instead of discussing, you have stared an edit war. Please self-revert and enter the discussion at Cem Özdemir#Secular Islam. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:14, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for your recent edit on Islam.

Septate (talk) 06:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Cem Özdemir. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cem Özdemir. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear Maurice Flesier, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Order of Merit of the Republic of Turkey. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam^Talk 02:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Harita hakkında.

Merhaba Maurice. Bu haritaya Yunanistan'ı eklemeyi unutmuşsun sanırım, daha doğrusu Turkish language sayfasına Yunanistan'ı yeni eklediğimden görmemişsindir. Bir de bu harita yerine bu haritanın güncellenmişi daha faydalı olur diye düşünüyorum, sence? Vector bilgim olmadığından elim kolum bağlı bu iki konuda, yardım edersen sevnirim. elmasmelih (used to be KazekageTR) 21:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Melih. I didn't forget to include Greece or other Turkish language spoken locations like Germany, Bulgaria.. Greece has not signed European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages by European Union. That's why it's not recognized officially. I am opposed to the use of this map. Because it is still disputed and not have any "reliable sources". If source is reliable and official, I can update the map. Greetings..Maurice Flesier (talk) 22:08, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article says Turkish is recognized by the government, shouldn't be enough for being in that map. And I agree about that 'Idioma turca', thats why i said that we should use the updated version of this map instead. There are few things to improve in that map by the way, not much. elmasmelih (used to be KazekageTR) 22:25, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Cem Özdemir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:22, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cem Özdemir. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Typically Muslim in your approach, you claim you will seek intervention but you choose a war. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:50, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about the recent edit at Cem Özdemir. The RfC has just started and others may come to edit and discuss, but when an editor makes policy- and guideline-based arguments, it's difficult to refute with opinion.

I suggest that we do not comment as our opinions are well described in the section above the RfC and it may be perceived as badgering or combative to engage with those who are merely commenting. If the RfC continues for a while, we could engage in discussion, but let others discuss for a few days anyhow. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jeez, it doesn't even sign it. here's the discussion Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 12:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mesut Özil. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:02, 14 July 2014 (UTC) Two quick things[reply]

You are now at three reverts on Mesut Özil.
The whole thing has been discussed over and over and over on the talk page (see the archives). It doesn't appear as though you didn't consult WP:OPENPARA or WP:MOSBIO which shows once again that you are not cut out for editing on Wikipedia. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:11, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. You hit four. The revert of the vandalism was in good form. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:23, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Maurice_Flesier reported by User:Walter Görlitz (Result: ). Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ARBPIA

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 10:17, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Turkish presidential election, 2014. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 21:31, 18 August 2014 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)[reply]

August 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Turkish presidential election, 2014. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adem (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I really don't understand the reason for this block. I would like to report a violation of edit war on WP:AN, but in the end I'm blocked. It's really not a fair decision. I wonder, did I violate the rule of WP:3RR in the last 24 hour period ? Otherwise, that decision has given looking at my extensive block log in the past? Thank you. Maurice Flesier (talk) 21:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The reason is clearly given in the block message above, and in more detail below. I would suggest reading the many, many warnings and block notices you have received in the past related to edit warring. Kuru (talk) 22:07, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You reverted four times on August 18. The first was a series of consecutive edits ending at 10:54. The second was a single edit at 17:28. The third was a series of consecutive edits ending at 19:38. The last was a single edit at 19:41.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I support you

I think your banning wasn't just, the color should have been blue or grey. I support you and hope to see you here again. Denizyildirim (talk) 17:36, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turkey, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nut and Manti. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish language

I thought that, as one of the official languages of the Cyprus, it would be an official language of European Union, such as Luxembourgish. --Akinranbu (talk) 15:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey is not an EU member, so such a thing is not in question. Maurice Flesier (talk) 15:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fuad I of Egypt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

ād al-Awwal'', {{lang-tr|I. Fuad or Ahmed Fuad Paşa}}); 26 March 1868{{spaced ndash}}28 April 1936) was the [[Sultan of Egypt|Sultan]] and later [[King of Egypt|King]] of [[Kingdom of Egypt|Egypt]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tomb of Suleyman Shah

Hi - I've added a comment at Talk:Tomb of Suleyman Shah#TOMB NOT A SOVEREIGN ENCLAVE regarding the revert you just made. Interested to hear your thoughts. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 16:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maurice Flesier, can you please discuss your edits to the article? It would also, perhaps, be best for everyone to not make edits until the discussion is resolved. – Zntrip 20:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Turkey. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 20:41, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]