User talk:Captainm

A warm welcome from Bottesiηi

Hello, Captainm, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up very shortly to answer your questions. Don't be afraid to ask!
If you would like to experiment with Wikipedia, I invite you to do so in my own personal sandbox (just follow the simple rules!) or in the Wikipedia sandbox.
When you contribute on talk pages or in other areas, it is important to sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Happy editing! — ßottesiηi ^{Tell me what's up} 22:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Continuous Vandalism

Hello there. I notice that. Blocks can't be used to punish for past actions, but to protect from further vandalism. The user, while pretty nasty, does not merit a block for now because he is likely already gone. Note that he usually vandalizes around once every two days (except on 21th, when he should have been blocked, though), so a block would not reach him (as anonymous blocking should be short. Either he just like to bother ("Let's deface Wikipedia now" and done), or he knows about our rules and games with the system. Sorry, but for now, unless he reaches a level 4 warning, a block is not really applicable. -- ReyBrujo 00:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need your opinion

Please check out Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Lebanon/Assessment and post any comments you may have. LestatdeLioncourt ^talk 14:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wording in 2006–present Lebanese revolt

Hi Captainm. I noticed you've reverted the word "killed" to "wounded". This is a bit of a confusing point, as all the references I can find use the term "casualty", which is usually refers to someone who is killed in English, but can also mean someone who is injured. I've changed the term in the article to also use "casualty", to keep the statement as neutral and vague as the reference it cites. Cheers. — George Saliba^[talk] 22:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You recent rever to Talk:Free Patriotic Movement

Hi. I noticed that you reverted my dropping the importance of the Free Patriotic Movement article from a rating of mid-importance to a rating of low-importance. From WikiProject Lebanon's assessment guidelines, a rating of low indicates that a topic "is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of Lebanon, but may cover topics related to Lebanon", and "few readers outside of Lebanon or that are not within the local area of the article's topic may be familiar with the subject matter." It's worth noting that a Google search for "Free Patriotic Movement" returns 60,600 results, compared to a search for "Hassan Nasrallah" that returns 748,000 results and is rated mid-importance, and compared to a search for "Samir Geagea" that returns 157,000 results and is rated low-importance. There is a disconnect here – numerically speaking, either the FPM article belongs in the low-importance category, or the Samir Geagea article belongs in the mid-importance category. Thoughts? — George^[talk] 13:13, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user discussion page Captainm 14:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I'm more worried about being consistent than what these articles are rated. I'm going to classify such articles as mid-importance as I go through them (Michael Aoun and Samir Geagea are currently both low-importance I believe). Cheers. — George^[talk] 20:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rechtsgutachten betr Apostasie im Islam.jpg

Can you take a look at this and the comment on the image talk page (on its Commons talk page) and provide feedback about a better translation or possibly a complete fresh translation? Much obliged. -N 16:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Interwiki

Hey.. First of all thank you:) I wasn't aware of this before, so thanks for pointing that out. I thought it is simply the name of the page in a different language.

As for the Orange Room, indeed I contribute there for Lebanese Army related news and topics, but there is really no cooperation there...

The Lebanese Army threads on MP.net are growing and attracting more members and visitors, I'm glad for that.

Thank your for the advice... --Zaher1988 (talk) 08:08, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rercruiting for LAF TF

Hello I though of you when i was asked to recruit members for the LAF Task Force for WikiProject, in order to officially proceed with it. If you are interested, please add your name to the participants section.

--Zaher1988 (talk) 12:11, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dassault Systemes Company Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Dassault Systemes Company Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CATIA Brand logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CATIA Brand logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Captainm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Captainm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Captainm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 09:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]