User talk:CommunityNotesContributor
Index
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
A barnstar for you
[edit]
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| You deserve it. Pachu Kannan (talk) 16:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC) |
Summarising two sections in Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present)
[edit]Can you help to summarise July 2024 and August 2024. In Israel – Hamas War I think that we should include at least some of the claims of IDF and Hamas or at least sources to avoid violation of WP:NPOV.Pachu Kannan (talk) 03:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Will have a look at it later today and see what I can do. CNC (talk) 14:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Can you help me again
[edit]Can you also help to summarise August 2024 section of Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present). Thank you for all your help. Pachu Kannan (talk) 04:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- To be honest, as per criticisms previously expressed elsewhere, that section looks like Timeline of the Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present)#August 2024 in a different format, if anything with more content included rather than less. Unlike July that had less info, this looks almost impossible to trim, as would require the removal of most of the content. I actually had a go twice and was left thinking "but what do I actually keep here?" At this point I'd honestly just suggest WP:TNT and start again. A good summary would be a list of strikes in different locations (expansion of the conflict), total numbers wounded and operatives killed, and a focus on actual notable events such as August 2024 Lebanon strikes. This could be done in a single paragraph, for example what new targets were hit, was there an increase/decrease in casualties or operatives killed, etc. The format of the timeline is otherwise far superior than that the day to day account in the main article. If I wanted to read a day to day account of August, I'd prefer to be reading the timeline article personally. To me it seems like either TNT for FORK "Further clashes and retaliations" section if you want to retain the current content. But then this would again raise the question of why are there basically two timelines in different formats. I'm honestly lost with how I can help further with this article I'm afraid. CNC (talk) 22:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- I removed at least some of that content. Can you help me now. Pachu Kannan (talk) 01:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- I am requesting you again to help because this month will be completed in my time zone in next few hours. You can remove any unnecessary content. I also think that mentioning Nabatieh attack is important. I will not repeat my requests if this is becoming disturbing for you. Thank you for all your help until now. Pachu Kannan (talk) 14:08, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
typographical errors in your post
[edit]At Talk:2024 United Kingdom riots, you wrote:
- I think the second sentence covers this without needing to specify in the first sentence.
What you wrote would have made perfect sense if you had written:
- I think the second paragraph covers this without needing to specify in the first sentence.
-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- I did mean second sentence, as this references England. I'm still not convinced the riots in Northern Ireland were particularly notable as only occurred in a limited number of locations, in comparison to those in England. As a summary for what I think is due to clarify:
- MOS:FIRST = United Kingdom, as straightforward article description as confirmation to reader of basic scope
- MOS:OPEN = England, as
"the context in which the topic is being considered"
per due - MOS:LEAD = Notable events that happened in Northern Ireland, per second paragraph
- I can see how NI could be considered due for the OPEN, but not the FIRST personally. If readers were searching for the the article about riots in England or Northern Ireland in 2024, I don't believe they would think "wrong article" after reading the first sentence, but instead think "this is probably the article I'm looking for" and continue reading. I can understand the argument for being more specific in the first sentence, especially from a non-British persepctive, I just don't see it as necessary. Thanks for checking with me though, I did afterwards think maybe I should clarify second paragraph as well, but couldn't be bothered to be honest as you had already done so. CNC (talk) 18:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
September 2024 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Deletion discussion about Far-right riots
[edit]Hello, CommunityNotesContributor
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username 1ctinus and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Far-right riots, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 7 § Far-right riots.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|1ctinus}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
-1ctinus📝🗨 20:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Cornelia Kapocs
[edit]Hi @CommunityNotesContributor, I'm currently working on a new article entry for Cornelia Kapocs (Liverpool Women) in my sandbox here just FYI. Feel free to join in if you're interested. I'll move it to the mainspace once it's good enough to be put up. GNKJ95 (talk) 02:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for notice, it's part of this initiative so is good know 😊 CNC (talk) 20:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Question about your destubbing
[edit]Hi CommunityNotesContributor, I just wanted to clear up something - I think it's just us doing things in a different way but just wanted to check - we both do destubbing work but I noticed that you destubbed Armisa Kuč, as I feel that is still a stub. What do you do to consider something not a stub? Hope your doing well :) RossEvans19 (talk) 01:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Per WP:ASSESS it has relevant images, links, multiple subheadings, with borderline reliable sourcing. Not enough content to be a full article, but has just about outgrown a stub. I'd also consider this sort of article on the border of stub and start. CNC (talk) 15:52, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- That makes sense, thank you for clearing that up - Thank you as well for your tireless contributions, I hope I didn't come off as rude or anything! RossEvans19 (talk) 16:12, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- No all good. Made me question that decision which is never a bad thing :) CNC (talk) 16:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- That makes sense, thank you for clearing that up - Thank you as well for your tireless contributions, I hope I didn't come off as rude or anything! RossEvans19 (talk) 16:12, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
"Wikipedia:OPENLETTER" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Wikipedia:OPENLETTER has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 7 § Wikipedia:OPENLETTER until a consensus is reached. Sdkb talk 21:43, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for creating Template:Wikipedia open letters! And yes, you're welcome! Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 22:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |