User talk:DiasMi012

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Bloods, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 04:58, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Expo Line Edits

Hi DiasMi012. I see you are making date edits to Expo line pages. While your enthusiasm is fantastic and much appreciated, in many instances you have not given a source - and in more than one instance used an old and incorrect source for new information.

Remember that all information entered must be factual and must have a source. If you need help doing this, please let me know and I'd be happy to point out a few examples. Note also that the Farmdale station is not slated to open on April 28. I wish it were, but several sources have confirmed this. They're just not done. ...unless you know something different? ;) Lexlex (talk) 00:41, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Crips, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 13:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Metro Rapid

The MTA states on it's Metro Rapid page (check the Update tab) that municipal operators are involved in the program. Please stop blanking content without appropriate sources. Pacific Coast Highway (talk) 01:10, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Los Angeles Metro Bus fleet

How about you stop putting unaccurate information on the section and removing Division "6, 8 and 15" as well and removing NABI from the 900 future order's on the future section fleet, and stop spreading lies.

I am not trying to vandalize at least or put false information, but I am getting sick of it too. You got no proof on where the 45C's are going, and who are the bidders. I don't care if information came from another friend of yours or a fan that works for Metro. Documents or prove (at least) or edit will be reverted. Please keep TBA on the 900 bus until the contract gets awarded to a bus manafacture. I am getting fusturated too. I wonder why you haven't been promoted to CPTDB Wiki editors yet but I prefer not to talk about it. By the way, if you reply to my talk page, you will not receive a response further from me so don't waste time and it will be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Random5555 (talk • contribs) 12 July 2012

Welcome!

Hello, DiasMi012, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:59, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User:Random5555, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:37, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Random5555

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:37, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Los Angeles Metro bus fleet. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:01, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This edit doesn't include a reliable source, and you also didn't post on the article's talk page explaining what your reliable sources for this information were. Without reliable sources, you are wrong in this particular edit-war. If you want to avoid being blocked for breaking Wikipedia's rules, you need to start a discussion on the talk page clearly explaining why you are making this change, and what sources verify that you are correct. If you are correct, consensus on the talk page will mean your desired change will stay. If you're wrong, and there aren't any sources for this right now, then you don't really want to make the change anyway, right? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:03, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Farmers Field

Please stop adding unsourced information about the future per WP:CRYSTAL. Thank you, 72Dino (talk) 00:59, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of ANI discussion

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your dispute with Random5555

~~I strongly suggest you and Random5555 stop interacting with each other. Stop addressing each other, stop editing the same articles, and stop backhandedly mentioning him/her in your edit summaries.~~ If you continue to demonstrate that you can't get along with other editors, you may be blocked from editing. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:23, 14 August 2012 (UTC) Partially withdrawn per discussion on my talk page. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Post by me Random5555

I have agreed a few weeks ago to keep my comments civils with you and I haven't been lately through an agruement with you since I just decided to be nice about this a few weeks ago. I did a good thing, but this one [[ wikipedia staff apparently are harrasing us both on what we been doing, and we have done nothing wrong lately.

While we may not have gotten along in the past, at least we try to keep comments civil lately rather then start an arguement over for one thing. I even said it I will keep my comments civil as long as you do, and yet the staff is harrasing us still when we weren't disrepectful.

Sure we have been going through a conflict, but I like you let you know I have since stopped and learned my lesson after the first warning I got and decided to stop this madness and just try to doing right thing to follow the rules.

I guess now it's better to create a own Independent website then rely on wikipedia since now there's too much harrasement by a staff.

I already reply to Kuyabribri on his talk page so he can leave us alone.

- Random5555 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Random5555 (talk • contribs) 22:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see response on my talk page. Cheers, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:36, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1997-1998 Neoplan AN440A 6300-6600 fleet

Please do NOT relocate this to the retired roster just yet until all units are offically retired & are all out of service! The "Retired" section is for buses "OFFICALLY RETIRED" not most retired, but all retired. If you move it to retired roster just like that, it will make page look more unaccurate. I just leave them on the active roster while 6 are all in service.

Just because new buses will be delivered next month like you said doesn't mean they will retire that fast yet, but they will be replaced Eventually.

They may not run the often anymore but they still operate in service sometimes, once a B/O confirms all units are all retired/out of service then it will be relocated to retired roster, but for now it should be left the way it is at.

In reality no one would ever move the a bus fleet to retired roster when there's only a few buses in service until they are offically retired/out of service when it comes to editing to retired roster.

I understand your point about the era of it being over, but it will confuse some people and several could assume they are retired, what I'm worried, despite being added to notes. Thank you.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Random5555 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I won't stop you from putting the 6300 series fleet it onto retired roster, i'll give the green light as long as the active note list is added while they remain active.

-random5555 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Random5555 (talk • contribs) 02:13, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- As for bus fans complaining about the roster being edited and all that, I really "don't" think anyone uses the LACMTA Bus roster from wikipedia as a referance or a source anyways and I know most people here in L.A don't care about buses which I am aware, only several do, as being here in L.A. Mainly NYC, NJ, Philadelphia and Canada areas have more bus & rail fans. I'm pretty sure transit-fans would rather use the CPTDB wikipdia roster as a better source, but they are all a mess & out of order, disorganized, outdated as I read more then one roster for lots of transit agencies. Yes, I do research for almost every transit ageny.

L.A does have more rail fans more then bus fans.

However CPTDB Wiki LACMTA and LADOT roster look well organized, but LACMTA not in order by year but clean then some other roster for other transit agencies. Of course CPTDB isn't well updated on rosters.

I have talked with several people that have interest in transit, rather they are fans or not, and usually people would tell me they never use wikipedia as a source as anyone can edit.

I never trust any information from transit fans usually, i'll admit because they are known to being "foamers", "lairs", & "spreading rumors". I never spread rumors at all costs and prefer not to speculate, but I do know more facts on whats goes on since I read and see the reality on what I saw.

I only believe the ones that have accurate information from the owner of ttmg.org owner when it comes to NYCT/MTA Bus usually, but not 100% though but he seems legit about the future & certain people that have been always legit.

I use to wikipedia as a referance but not anymore, I only edit to put whats accurate but never use it as a source anymore as it's all ruined by certain editors, won't mention details or names though, and will not dicuss this either about it being ruined.

That is my 2nd cents here on what I said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Random5555 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of ANI discussion

Hello, I just thought I'd let you know that there is a discussion about an issue with which you are involved at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, under the subject heading "Los Angeles Metro bus fleet". I know that you have taken exception to my posting on your talk page in the past; however, the only reason I am posting on your talk page because it is mandatory for a user who reports you on that noticeboard to notify you of such a report, and Asloge (talk · contribs), the user who reported you, has not done so. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DiasMi012 - Asloge (talk · contribs) violated the talk page guidelines by removing the above comment. If you wish to remove it you are welcome to do so. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:22, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you right there. Have a nice day Kuayabribri! **Saying in Sarcasm way** — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asloge (talk • contribs) 00:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Los Angeles Metro bus fleet

When editing the "Los Angeles Metro bus fleet" section, please stop putting unnecessary notes, and duplicating repeated notes. That includes bus accident notes or unsourced notes, this page was renovated two years ago for a reason since it was all messy.

By the way ignore the "Notice of ANI Dicussion" comment above by made by Kuyabribri and his post.

I have reverted edits since there was so many notes that are unsourced, duplication, unnecessary and bus accident notes that were not really needed. I hope you understand and respect the pages, as not all notes are not necessary to be added onto each pages as it makes the page look messy sir.

Thank you!

Los Zetas and MS13

Here's a source. [1] ComputerJA (talk) 23:55, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 05:38, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, no long time, no see until now.

Hello there Mr. Dias. I don't know if you still have interest on transit, but if you do, you should try to join the Subchat website and post on the website group. You sure could post anything and contribute information on what you know about buses and trains. You should try to join Subchat, the website is www.subchat.com

You can post on any section you want, if you want to join subchat, you should try to click on "Obtain a Posting Password" in order to Join the Subchat website and post on the website.

Hopefully you visit the website and read every post!

You should try to post on Subchat website, it would be nice to see more members joining that website! Subchat could use more Los Angeles busfans to contribute information on the website for sure! Please join. :)

Thanks for reading!

-Random5555

Los Angeles Metro bus fleet

I would like to ask you to stop messing with the page already. I have seen to reverted my edit here [2] This shows your a disrespectful person here. I have told you that there's NO reason for you to delete "3" from the Division list because Division 3 had many New Flyer C40HFs before and most of them went to D7 and a couple to D5, and yet to had the courage to revert the edit. The last time D3 had C40HFs was in December 2004 and they had many of them I know for a fact. Plus since the C40HFs are retired, I listed all the Divisions they have been to before and 3 was one of them, and I know for a fact that every retired bus has every single Division listed that they have been assigned to before and D3 had C40HFs. They may not had them until retirement, but they had them BEFORE. Learn how to respect other people's work. I'm starting to get fed up with people like you who mess up the pages and don't respect anyone's work and not even respecting what others say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.58.202 (talk) 01:03, August 23, 2014 (UTC)

Excuse me? The one who needs to respect people's opinions is YOU. I respect everyone else's opinions. Actually regrading your comment about the C40HFs, I disagree, because for the retried buses, you list every Division that had these buses rather they they had them until retirement or NOT. Actually Division 3 had C40HFs for 5 years (1999-2004) and I think they should still be listed because they had them too before and not listing D3 is like saying D3 did NOT have C40HF which is NOT true at all. You need to learn to respect history and respect other people before they get pissed off.

Each of the retired bus fleet has each Division listed that it had been before even if certain Divisions did not had them til retirement. I do my research, and work hard to contribute to the page.

By the way, you need to calm down and learn how to respect others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.58.202 (talk • contribs) 02:01, 23 August 2014

Please see WP:ANI#User Complaint: DiasMi012. Johnuniq (talk) 03:54, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:75.82.58.202, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I got your message and whatnots about that user snitching on me to you over some bs that he's crying about. I make a minor edit and all of a sudden this inferior, pops out and reverses my edit, thus I re-edited it again. A day or so he starts replying at me with his angry words and starts slamming me over it and re-edits the division list. That's when I responded back at him and did my revision again. The next thing you know me and him go to war on worlds, until he starts ratting me out and you're now warning me that I will be hindered from editing, for failure to abide with the guilelines of Wikipedia. I think you need to see what he wrote and catch him in the act, as well. DiasMi012 (talk) 08:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)DiasMi012[reply]

Hello and regrading about Los Angeles Metro bus fleet.

Hello, this is Random5555. I have to tell you something, I notice your having issues with other users out there and I would like to tell you regrading about the 1999 New Flyer C40HFs. I am gonna have to say that the other user has a reason to put "3" under Division as D3 had New Flyer C40HFs before and I don't think you should delete "3" from the list because they used to be assigned there. The C40HFs may Not ended their lives at D3 but they certainly were assigned there.

I'm going to give you an example why you should leave 3 on the list. Let me talk about the 1998 NFI D40LF (3000-3019), those started out of D5 but they all were all sent to D6 in 2001, and in early 2009, 4 out of 20 units were sent to Veolia. The 1998 D40LFs didn't end their lives, but Division 5 is listed because they had them before and they are under "retired" list. They are other former past LACMTA that were assigned to other Divisions but they didn't end their lives there because they got moved. I think you should leave "3" on Division list because the C40HFs did start out of D3 and D5 and they had for a few years.

I don't blame the other user for being mad, and understand it. I think 3 needs to be left on the list as what other user said.

Hope fully you understand.

Random5555

First of all, the user shouldn't have came to me on a verbal aggressive way and could of said it the alternate way, which he failed to do so, and I responded back at his comments and gave him a fair warning if he tries to f*** with me again. I'll bet he won't like it and back away from it.

Anyways, regarding about the 2000 New Flyer C40HF buses (5000-5222) they were at divisions 3, 5, 7 and 18. Although, a few of them were at SGV-3 division, when they were brand new and entering into service in the early 2000s, before being sent to divisions SB-5 and WSC-7. If you haven't noticed, a few of their cousins C40LF buses were at the same division they were, since one 5300 series bus was on line 180 in the early 2000s, when it was brand new. So, it wasn't the C40HFs that were at D3, their cousins were, too.

Yeah, SB-5 division did have a few of the New Flyer D40LF buses (3000-3019) at one time, before they were sent to WSC-6 for almost their whole life, before 3 or 4 units were sent to Veolia Transportation (a bus contractor) in 2009 or 2010. I remembered riding one of those D40LF buses on line 115, when SB-5 used to operate that line, shared by SB-18, which currently owns the line.

Btw, thanks for sending me a message in a civilized matter. After all, me and you have had verbal altercations in the beginning over bus stuff and changes. But it's all cool now, right? DiasMi012 (talk) 10:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Division 3 had the 5000s through 5070s range while D5 had the 5080s, 5090s, 5100s and 5200s. D3 did also had a few 5100s once as well I recall. D3 had penlty of C40HFs before they started going to D7. The C40HFs started their lives at D3 and D5. D7 got all or most of the C40HFs from D3 few years later and they have gotten C40HFs from D5 in the past as well many years ago when the 5080s and 5090s got displaced by new 60-BRT buses at D5 and they did get more from D5 this past year and early this year.

Random5555

August 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24hrs for serious personal attacks. Minor violations of WP:NPA usually get a warning - referring to someone as "inferior" is unacceptable. All editors are equal.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. the panda ₯’ 21:34, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And your point of hindering me from editing anything on Wikipedia (due to a user who was being delinquent and a nuisance)? I believe you need to revise on the IR (incident report) he sent to you about me verbally attacking him. He came at me in a verbal aggressive way and tried to play the victim.

btw, how does the word 'inferior' an offense? It's not a profane word.

Profane words like 'b****, mother****er, f*** you, a**hole, c*******ing, bull****, d***, and so on are more offending words than what you told me about one word being unacceptable.

Please, try to be more specific on what you're talking about, before you bewildered your thoughts.

It doesn't need to be profane to be a personal attack. For example, "you're an idiot" is a personal attack, even though not profane. You agreed when you arrived on this private website to "comment on the edits, never the editor", yet you DIRECTLY called the person an "inferior", see the offensiveness of such a slur. Very unacceptable no matter what started the process the panda ₯’ 10:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LMFAO, you gotta be f***ing kidding me, but I'll take your word for it. If you haven't checked the user's verbal attack words at me. You should check, he's probably feeling proud for what he did and getting away with it, behind your back and maybe erasing his comments to avoid being caught in the act. He sized me up, so I sized him back. I know it's wrong to call people by slurs, but it's what it is and needs to take his own medicine.

No. Grownups don't resort to "take his own medicine" - they take the higher ground. the panda ₯’ 11:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Los Angeles" Rams

I noticed that you edited the page St. Louis Rams to note that they had moved to Los Angeles. This almost certainly will be true soon, but at the moment, they are still the St. Louis Rams. They still technically play at the Edward Jones Dome. Nothing is official yet. Please refrain from making preemptive changes, despite the high likelihood of their ocurrence. If you would like to note it, the interior article has room to expand the news that they are Likely to be moving to Los Angeles. I'm sure your edits were in good faith, because it's really confusing right now. Thanks. Padsquad2010 (talk) 02:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DiasMi012. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DiasMi012. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DiasMi012. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DiasMi012. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]