User talk:Drew1830

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2013 Miami Hurricanes football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Drew1830. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Drew1830. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

United States women's national soccer team results (2010–19) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, United States women's national soccer team results (2010–19), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:04, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The hyperlinks to the results are linked in the year (ie 2010, 2011). Drew1830 (talk) 17:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States women's national soccer team results (2010–19) (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:United States women's national soccer team results (2010–19) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:United States women's national soccer team results (2010–19), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Drew1830! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:United States women's national soccer team results (2010–19) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:United States women's national soccer team results (2010–19), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:United States women's national soccer team results (2010–19)

Hello, Drew1830. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "United States women's national soccer team results".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:56, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Inter Miami CF season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chicago Fire, Red Bull Arena and Orlando City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:20, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. No edition of the CONCACAF Gold Cup has a sourced final ranking. Supplying one without a source violates WP:NOR. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced? It's a summary of the fucking results on the page. Drew1830 (talk) 19:46, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are deeply mistaken. A source in this case is a reference from CONCACAF that supports the order you invented. Every single finals had been marked with a {{citation needed}} template for at least two years. This since July 2017 and this since 2011. And you have the gall to use profanity when I remove it? You may not restore unsourced content. Anything short of that is WP:OR and violates WP:V. I am not going to revert, but you are at WP:3RR and youre next revert with 24 hours could find you blocked. Perhaps @Anaxagoras13: or @GiantSnowman: are able to explain this to you a bit better. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:31, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not mistaken, clown. The results are sourced. The table is a summary of said results. The same could be said about every other section as well. Where is the "external source" for the goal scorers being organized in that way? It's an infinite regress. Yes, I have the gall to call you a clown for removing totally sourced, innocuous material without notice and then reverting my edits in a smarmy, school marmish manner. Drew1830 (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Drew - firstly, please don't swear. Secondly, what is the external reliable source you are using to reference the content in question? Giant Snowman 08:49, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will swear when I please, thank you. Look above. There's no need for an external source for a mere summary of sourced material. If that's the case then I'm going to start deleting a bunch of stuff without an external source. Drew1830 (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No Drew. Just like in polite society, swearing is not considered appropriate. See Wikipedia:Civility.

As GS asked, provide the source because they are needed. This is not a summary of match results.

You are most welcome to delete unsourced content (provided it's not WP:BLUE material). Also, be careful not to be WP:POINTy in your removal of content. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:01, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, clown. The only person interrupting Wikipedia to make a point is you. Drew1830 (talk) 17:34, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how adhering to WP:V is in any way "interrupting", but perhaps while you're blocked you can explain it.

You could also explain why ranking should be exempt from Wikipedia's sourcing requirements. There was a discussion about including unsourced final rankings at Talk:2018_FIFA_World_Cup/Archive_2#Final Standings and Talk:2018 FIFA World Cup#Final standings, but that is soon to be moved to the archives, and one just under that section. The discussions there, and the general consensus of the WP:FOOTY project is that they should not be included. The other two registered editors who have been involved up to this point are also admins, but there's another editor, @PeeJay:, who might be interested in your explanations for inclusion so I have pinged PeeJay. Obviously, a source would make inclusion the easiest, but gaining WP:CONSENSUS for inclusion is your next best option. Obviously, respect the civility policy in all discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:14, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 18:19, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aquinas updated logo, 2015.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aquinas updated logo, 2015.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to 1996 Major League Soccer season, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please discuss the proposed changes on the talk page, per the WP:BRD process. Sounder Bruce 22:40, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please use an edit summary to explain why you are making such changes. The new table has several errors on top of formatting issues and links to disambiguation pages. Sounder Bruce 22:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No mistake. Your suggestions are just stupid and so I'm reverting all of your reversions. The edits are being made for uniformity purposes. No other years (or league seasons in *any* other league) have the stadiums pictures listed in such a way. That's reserved for a on-off tournament. Not a season. Unless you can explain why 1996 needs it and, say, 2023 doesn't then my point stands. Stop being a school marm. ~~~~ Drew1830 (talk) 22:45, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just try to be diplomatic instead of rude, okay? Name-calling is not acceptable here, and neither is a lack of communication when trying to make major changes. A simple edit summary would suffice, as well as cleaning up disambiguation links and broken section formatting. Sounder Bruce 22:52, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. You swoop in like a clown and revert edits without any communication. I don't do that to you. Get a life. Drew1830 (talk) 22:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a collaborative project, so you don't own any articles. Any user can dispute whether a change is necessary and hash out a compromise with civil discussion, which seems to not be happening here. Sounder Bruce 22:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And neither do you. But apparently you've made yourself the arbiter of what's appropriate. You didn't discuss anything before reverting edits. So I will do the same to you. Drew1830 (talk) 22:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2000 Major League Soccer Eastern Conference table

A tag has been placed on 2000 Major League Soccer Eastern Conference table requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Duplicate of Template:2000 Major League Soccer Eastern Conference table

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sounder Bruce 18:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MLS tables and other edits

Please make sure to include categories and proper sources (the ones used for the 2004 tables are dead links). Your edits to the season articles must also cite sources and need to be checked for accuracy. Sounder Bruce 19:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2004 Major League Soccer season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jaime Moreno.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2007 Major League Soccer season, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Sounder Bruce 18:53, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2007 Major League Soccer season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diego Gutiérrez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at 2012 Major League Soccer season. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drew1830 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This blocking makes zero sense. I was never involved in an edit war since I never edited anybody's revisions. I merely reverted revisions that were made to my edits. If that necessitates a ban than SounderBruce and everyone else involved should be banned too for doing the same thing. Drew1830 (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you are describing is edit warring. Additionally, during an unblock request, you should only talk about your own actions. The actions of others is not relevant. Yamla (talk) 18:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to edit (or remove) declined unblock requests for your currently active block. You are, however, free to make a new request. --Yamla (talk) 14:54, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drew1830 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm just going to keep doing this. I don't respect this process at all. How can I when the person reviewing the request claimed that what happened to cause my reversions was irrelevant. A completely nonsensical claim. Also, unless PeeJay and SounderBruce are also blocked for a week then this process is confirmed to be a joke. They reverted edits dozens of times when apparently three is worthy of a blocking. Drew1830 (talk) 15:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're just going to keep doing what? Making non-WP:GAB-compliant appeals focusing on others? If that's the case, your talk page access will likely be revoked. As this appeal does not meet any of the requirements for an unblock to be considered, I'm declining it. Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drew1830 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It seems like every administrator is a complete assclown. This is now the second idiot to claim that, somehow, what I was responding to was irrelevant to my blocking. Which is obviously stupid. I should be unblocked because this is a sham process and I didn't do anything wrong. I didn't revert anybody's edits. I merely ignored the silly and petty reasons that ignorant third parties reverted my edits. So, yes, I'll keep logging these requests until they're heard. Drew1830 (talk) 21:56, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Requests with personal attacks are not considered. If Bbb23 hadn't revoked TPA I would have. I will extend the block. 331dot (talk) 23:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TPA revoked. Contemplated increasing the block to indefinite, but I suppose we can wait until after expiration of the block to see if the user has come to their senses. Any admin, however, is welcome to increase the block if they feel it's appropriate.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries, especially in Template space

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:44, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not remove categories and See also links from Template pages, as you did in this edit and others. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:48, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1998 Major League Soccer season

added a link pointing to Chicago Fire

1999 Major League Soccer season

added a link pointing to Chicago Fire

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2012 Major League Soccer season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montreal Impact.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Template:2012 Major League Soccer Western Conference table, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. —Bruce1ee ^talk 23:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2000 Major League Soccer season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mamadou Diallo and Jaime Moreno.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:2019 Major League Soccer Eastern Conference table. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. MOS:ACCESS is policy. Don't make articles inaccessible to people with screen readers. Sounder Bruce 20:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They're not unconstructive. 'Appear' is doing a lot of work in that sentence. Stop being a school marm. If you revert my edits without consultation then I will do the same to yours. Drew1830 (talk) 20:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Sounder Bruce 20:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 22:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note I'm sure any reviewing admin would look anyway, but I'm copying over the block log entry here: "Disruptive editing deliberately, maliciously undoing another users edits for no reason other than revenge, personal attacks in the form of childish name calling, attitude generally incompatible with a collaborative project" Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 23:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drew1830 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There's zero process to this stuff whatsoever. Some guy just reverts my edits and is allowed to get away with it. I revert edits and I'm banned indefinitely. His charges are bogus. Who gets to decide what's "unconstructive" editing? Apparently some guy named SounderBruce has been given this power. Drew1830 (talk) 12:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblock provided. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drew1830 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Different rules for different users. Zero review of my request. Summary judgments always in favor of favored users. This is a sham process. Drew1830 (talk) 14:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've provided no request, just unfounded complaints. A proper request would speak to the reason for the block and tell what you would do differently. This has nothing to do with "favored users", only your conduct. We don't fight fire with fire here; if others behave improperly towards you, there are proper processes to deal with it. Your attitude is not compatible with a collaborative project with people working together. Until you convince us this will change, you will not be permitted to edit. 331dot (talk) 17:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drew1830. Thank you. Sounder Bruce 01:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]