User talk:Grigor Khachatrian

Welcome!

Hi Grigor Khachatrian! I noticed your contributions to Amberd and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kleuske (talk) 09:42, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kleuske, thans for your reply, this motivated me a lot. Surely I am going to continue the edits and help to improve the Wikipedia content. Grigor Khachatrian (talk) 09:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Amberd. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 09:43, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Music for Future Cultural Foundation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Music for Future Cultural Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 18:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey GPL93, hope my message finds you well, as you could notice in the talk category of this draft, I have requested to review, and if there will be needed to make changes, I will kindly do. So there were no reason to speedly delete this draft, as it was not finally published.

Please provide me details of your decision, and give me access to the draft, so that I can make changes.

I am open to make any changes, but this is not a way to rudely review this draft, and speedy delete it. Grigor Khachatrian (talk) 09:09, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sergey Smbatyan (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheTechie was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sergey Smbatyan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grigor Khachatrian! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sergey Smbatyan (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anachronist was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Since the last time this was declined, there have been no substantive changes, no effort whatsoever to address the concerns of the previous reviewer. Please do not waste a reviewer's time by resubmitting essentially the same content that wasn't acceptable before. This draft is not neutral in tone, and was written to praise the subject rather than simply report facts in a neutral and dispassionate manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sergey Smbatyan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Anachronist (talk) 21:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sergey Smbatyan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sergey Smbatyan. Thanks! Recon rabbit 14:31, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sergey Smbatyan (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CurryTime7-24 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Probably notable, but this draft currently has some problems that need to be resolved before it can be accepted into mainspace. Foremost are the numerous assertions which have no cited sources to confirm. This is unacceptable per WP:BLP. The article also tends to PR-speak (see WP:IMPARTIAL, WP:SUBJECTIVE, and WP:TONE). —

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sergey Smbatyan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:07, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]