User talk:Happysailor/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Happysailor. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Category for creation
Hi, it looks as if you provided a mistaken link when you replied at WT:Articles for creation/Category federation architecture. I'm not sure whether there is a better page to recommend, but WP:AFC/R doesn't seem to meet the need.
The editor created Category:Federation Architecture, which has since been salvaged as a list (section of main article) and a category. – Fayenatic London 22:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Steve Nicholls
I went to create a new article the other day and see that you had previously reviewed one on the same person at AfC HERE. Just thought that you would like to take a look at it before I move it to the main space. I was actually able to use quite a bit of the information from the submitted article which saved me some time. The new one is in my sandbox HERE. I will be adding some additional information over the next day or so but thought you would like to see the difference from what was submitted and what I actually did to the article. --Morning277 (talk) 12:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Summa Metaphysica (2), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 11:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification, but it's not my page... - Happysailor (Talk) 18:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
AFC Backlog
Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!
 Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1074 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial. |
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1074 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
News
|
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser TSU
- Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
EdwardsBot (talk) 00:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1074 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
|
| The WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Huh
I didn't do anything wrong to be honest. Ian Watkins is in a band named Anal Lube, they're a very underground Drum & Bass group. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.97.1.26 (talk) 13:05, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- If that was true, you'd be able to provide reliable sources to confirm that fact... - Happysailor (Talk) 13:07, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
united kingdom local elections 2013
hi just like to say the pictures on the page is in the wrong order. it starts from the most popular to the least. labor had 38%, the conservatives had 31% and the libiral demicrats had 16%. the rest of the content that we deleated before was incorrect info as the local elections have not happened yet. sorry if this has caused you trouble. thanks ~~scorpnorx~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.175.23 (talk) 15:09, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Informations
How will I know when I have my editions have been submitted? Thank you for your wonderful comments. Ayushi1 (talk) 02:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC)Ayushi1
- Edits go live straight away, however edits which are classed as mistakes or vandalism will usually be reverted immediately. - Happysailor (Talk) 06:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Playstation Page
I appreciate you rolling back the page after I made an edit to it, I was trying to prove to a friend that these pages can be publicly edited and filled with false information from time to time. --Bwillan (talk) 02:21, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- They can be, but there's alot of Bots and editors which monitor and revert vandalism - Happysailor (Talk) 06:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
limits
If we must have pages commemorating pedophiles on the wikipedia. Why do you remove comments that reflect the public opinion, of everyone (except other pedophiles of course)... Really it is a joyous day when one of these people dies, death is so rarely joyful. How dare you say this is not constructive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.182.166.181 (talk) 03:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- I suggest you look up the words "commemorating" and "factual artlcle" - Happysailor (Talk) 06:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Mikhail Kalashnikov
On the wikipedia page of Mikhail Kalashnikov, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Kalashnikov, The second to last quote on the quotations page, "Anything that is complex is not useful and anything that is useful is simple. This has been my whole life's motto.", does not have a reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.132.38.53 (talk) 06:13, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Then i suggest you add the appropriate template rather than edit a page and insert a 'rant' in capitals stating there is no referece - Happysailor (Talk) 06:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
HMS Triumph
Apologies if my edit was not marked correctly.
I was reading the page (following a doc on TV about its sinking during the Ottoman campaign) and noticed that the link from the text "Krupp cemented armour" (KCA) to go to the Wiki page on "Krupp cemented armour" - does not go to the page on that subject *despite that it exists*, but to another page - on "Krupp armour". I simply corrected the anomoly for the benefit of other users of Wikipedia.
I see you or someone has now re-introduced the anomoly without first investigating the reasons for the edit.
I love how some people decide how correct information is referred to a test or vandalism - I thought the idea of Wikipedia was to be free of oppressive "governments" from adding their own spin to what is right and what is wrong, but apparently not.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.249.206.245 (talk) 15:32, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
RN No.6 Uniform
Arn't that WHITE No.1 is No.6 Tropical Cere. uniform? as I worn it alot 10 tens ago — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.77.136.81 (talk) 13:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Thanks for reverting vandalism to my user page! I saw it listed on Huggle, but in the shock of realising it I didn't have time to click before you reverted the vandalism. Thanks again! - a boat that can float! (watch me float) 13:33, 4 January 2013 (UTC) |
- No worries!
- Happysailor (Talk) 17:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Happysailor
Sorry i am really intetedres in this so please help to find information and so i could make wikepidia improve — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.94.136.61 (talk) 16:29, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- This page might help you with editing Wikipedia - Help:Editing - Happysailor (Talk) 17:24, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Tom Wainwright
Please explain why you have reversed the edits made to the article on Tom Wainwright by my father. [[1]] Tom was my great grandfather. He was born in 1866 in Hatton, Derbyshire (ref: UK government census in 1871, 1881, 1891, 1901, 1911. Birth was registered in 1866 in Tutbury registration district which you can verify through http://www.staffordshirebmd.org.uk ) He died on 10 Nov 1934 (ref family records and probate registry index). If the dates and place of birth came from the source cited then that source is wrong! Surely the evidence of his family who knew him, and government records carry more weight?!
Patricia Wainwright ˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prmw (talk • contribs) 16:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- I suggest you take a look at Help:Editing which explains a bit about editing on WIkipedia, and also WP:CITE which explains how to cite to specific sources within an artcle. Your edits to the page broke exisiting coding which is partially why your edit was reverted. - Happysailor (Talk) 17:26, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page!! MadGuy7023 (talk) 17:19, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- NO worries, took a while for someone with 'the power' to finally get round to the AIV report - Happysailor (Talk) 17:26, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Edits to sandbox
You wrote:
Hello, I'm Happysailor. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to User:Mike Schwartz/subpage/sandbox3, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, - Happysailor (Talk) 16:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
I think that you made a mistake. The edits on Mike Schwartz's sandbox are a problem. That person grabbed content from Simson Garfinkel's home page and put it in his sandbox. The problem is that web searches for "Simson Garfinkel" are retrieving the sandbox, and not Simson Garfinkel's wikipedia page. This makes no sense at all. Mike Schwartz was doing some kind of experiment. But that experiment is over now and it serves no benefit to Wikipedia to keep the out-of-date information in place. I put in an edit that redirected the sandbox to the proper location, which handles the google problem. You undid it. Please put it back. 69.143.180.9 (talk) 03:28, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but how are links to the actual music this page is refrencing inappropriate? It is not for advertising purposes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justnice980 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Good work! :-) Widr (talk) 18:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks
Thanks for fixing my user-page after that user messed with it. TheMesquito (talk) 18:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- No worries - Happysailor (Talk) 18:58, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
restrict redirection of parori
yes, i removed the redirection of parori to zeygolatio, because this is not true.
Parori belongs to the voiotias perfecture and has no relationship with Parori(a) referred to Zevgolatio.
This has resulted to refered in facebook and in other social networks like it belongs to voiotia with the correct coordinates and have the description of the Zevgolatio. no relationship.
in greece there are 3-5 places named paror-(something)
in viotias perfecture , parori or parorio in arcadias perfecture , paroria or paroreio in Laconias perfecture , paroreio or parorio and in Florinas perfecture , paroreio
in greek language the diphthong vowel (ei) simulated with (i) , all these names written with (ei) except parori voiotias.
if you write in goggle maps the word "Parori" the only named place is parori viotias , if you write "Parorio" or "paroreio" you should have multiple choices.
you can see the details in greek wiki http://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%A0%CE%B1%CF%81%CF%8C%CF%81%CE%B9 and http://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%A0%CE%B1%CF%81%CF%8C%CF%81%CE%B9_%CE%92%CE%BF%CE%B9%CF%89%CF%84%CE%AF%CE%B1%CF%82
here are the wiki links of settlements in greek prefectures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_settlements_in_Boeotia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_settlements_in_Laconia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_settlements_in_Arcadia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_settlements_in_the_Florina_regional_unit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_settlements_in_the_Grevena_regional_unit
the name 'parori' is in Boeotia only.
if you have the authority or the prevalence, please fix those changes.
even the name 'Boeotia' i am not sure if is the real name, because everywhere written "viotia" , in google maps too. but for that im not sure, because i m not a philologist.
i dont know if there are the possibility to make alias or something else ...
i hope to have convinced you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.130.23.32 (talk) 01:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
My Edits
Hi, please do not edit my contributions to the Education Program talk:Northeastern University/Media and Democracy (2013 Q1). They are part of the requirements for that class which I am attending. Lavoile (talk) 14:14, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Apologies, didn't notice it was a talk page - i've reverted the warning - Happysailor (Talk) 14:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Online Dating Service
Hi Happysailor,
i get that you are dealing with lot of spam links, but i can assure you that link to Passion.com shouldn't be a problem. It's just a link to one of many dating websites, it's in External links section and i guess that some people reading the article would like to join some dating site. I will undo your changes, and if you are sure this is some kind of violation and if you remove link once again i won't put it any more, but i really don't see any problem.
Anyway, thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.94.245.130 (talk) 14:49, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- I suggest you read both the text immidiately above where you've been putting the link on the page, and also WP:EL which explains what links are suitable. - Happysailor (Talk) 14:58, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Ringwood School
Hi,
We are trying to edit our entry in Wikipedia and you have reverted the page, how do we prevent this.
213.123.115.244 (talk) 12:35, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Take a look at WP:COI and WP:PLAINSIMPLECOI which explains all about editing with a conflict of interest and also WP:COPY which explains about copyrights.
- Alot of the text you used was a copy/paste from the school website which has a copyright note at the bottom of the page, and was extremely 'promotional' about the school. All content needs to be nuetral and supported by reliable third party references. - Happysailor (Talk) 12:42, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, we'll have another go at making it more neutral and not using our own copyrighted material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.123.115.244 (talk) 15:22, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Audrey Bitoni
To whom it may concern: The image at the following link contains an explicit pornographic image in the background (on the television screen behind Ms. Bitoni) and should be removed asap as it violates Wikipedia standards. Thank you. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/22/Audrey_Bitoni_Exxxotica_Miami_2010.jpg/170px-Audrey_Bitoni_Exxxotica_Miami_2010.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.80.144.204 (talk) 12:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not censored. We do have a vague policy regarding sexual content at Wikipedia:Sexual content but the over-riding one is WP:CENSOR. I see you've taken the image off the article which i'm not going to revert, but I suggest you read the links I provided. - Happysailor (Talk) 13:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
A1 and A3 tags
Hi HappySailor, I saw you tagged Adin hebat as A1 in the same moment as it was created. Would you mind being a bit less hasty with A1 tags? Like A3 they are best not administered to articles in the first few minutes of creation, aside from the problem that some people build articles in a series of incremental edits there is a risk that goodfaith editors whose work is tagged too quickly will feel bitten and stop editing. Cheers and happy editing. ϢereSpielChequers 13:54, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Link remove
Hello,
you removed the link I put on wiki just few min ago.
Just wanted to ask that we have lots of info aboutNovalja and we are specilized to work there.
I saw you didnt moove external link from other similar recoiurces
Please can you give comment on that
Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.136.211.22 (talk) 14:05, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sure, Your advertising a business on Wikipedia which isn't allowed. Please read WP:External Links and WP:Spam. - Happysailor (Talk) 14:11, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Cardiffbay.co.uk
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Duplicate text.
|
|---|
|
Re: Cardiff Bay
Hello Happysailor. My name is Jon. I'm the director of cardiffbay.co.uk I would like to bring to your attention that this site is appropriate for Wikipedia. It has been on Wikipedia before and for a long time. It's content is purely for information purposes for our visitors. The site has over 34,000 visitors per month so that in itself shows that it is used and is very popular. Cardiff Harbour is showing on Wikipedia and our site has been around for allot longer and gives more information. Can you explain please why you find it to be inappropriate, when Cardiff harbour website is on there? It is also worth noting that cardiffbay.co.uk has an exact number of visits per month of 34,904 and Cardiffhabour.com has only 2078. I feel that there are undercurrents of both parties trying to sabotage the integrity of cardiffbay.co.uk Our site is very popular and does not need to be strengthened by its presence on Wikipedia but morally, it should be on there. We have other popular domain names that supply relevant information to visitors, currently on Wikipedia. I look forward to hearing from you. Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.171.170.156 (talk) 17:05, 2 February 2013 (UTC) |
Re: Cardiff Bay
Hello Happysailor.
My name is Jon. I'm the director of cardiffbay.co.uk
I would like to bring to your attention that this site is appropriate for Wikipedia. It has been on Wikipedia before and for a long time. It's content is purely for information purposes for our visitors. The site has over 34,000 visitors per month so that in itself shows that it is used and is very popular.
Cardiff Harbour is showing on Wikipedia and our site has been around for allot longer and gives more information.
Can you explain please why you find it to be inappropriate, when Cardiff harbour website is on there?
It is also worth noting that cardiffbay.co.uk has an exact number of visits per month of 34,904 and Cardiffhabour.com has only 2078.
I feel that there are undercurrents of both parties trying to sabotage the integrity of cardiffbay.co.uk
Our site is very popular and does not need to be strengthened by its presence on Wikipedia but morally, it should be on there.
We have other popular domain names that supply relevant information to visitors, currently on Wikipedia.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32bar (talk • contribs) 17:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Jon, The number of visits per month has nothing do do with what links get included in Wikipedia. The Harbour Website you mention is the government website for the managing authority of the bay, while yours (which has been removed on multiple occations from this article for spam, Conflict of Interest and advertising and which an account has already been blocked for this) seems to be a privately run commercial website not affiliated with either the Harbour Authority, the Council or even the Waterfront Partners (who have their own websites). I suggest you read WP:ELNO - Happysailor (Talk) 18:07, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- The cardiffbay.co.uk website has been on Wikipedia since 2007
- The Cardiff harbour site is a government website and we supply them emails that come into cardiffbay.co.uk to (Redacted)
- The water front partnership website has limited information and we, Cardiff Bay are a commercial site that supply updated information un like visitcardiffbay.info which has only limited information about who is at Cardiff bay which is misleading and out of date
- We place ads on the cardiffbay.co.uk site to cover the time and costs that we spend on the site. There are many other sites linked on Wikipedia that are also commercial sites that have advertising on their sites
- walesonline.co.uk is one of them
- I think you have been told by someone from either Cardiff harbour or water front partners that we are not official when we are - Commercial or not.
- I look forward to your response.
- Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32bar (talk • contribs) 19:33, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- ok, ill answer these point by point:
- The external link to your site was removed from Wikipedia's Cardiff Bay article in May 2007 due to link-spam, in which an editor, User:Cardiffbayhostmaster (Was this you?), was blocked indefinitely from editing here for continuously breaking the rules. It hasn't been present since then.
- The fact you forward emails has nothing to do with this issue (I have also redacted the email so that person doesn't start getting spam)
- Where have I said that this is because you have adverts on your site? Also, Walesonline is a media outlet, like the BBC or the Guardian, so to compare yourselves to them is odd.
- The word official is interesting, how are you the official website of cardiff bay? The word usually signifies that you are the company/person responsible for Cardiff Bay (and that cardiffbay.co.uk is the official website of that company/person), when your not.
- I'm waiting on comments from others atm so we'll see. - Happysailor (Talk) 21:14, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- You haven't answered all my questions and yes I also await others comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32bar (talk • contribs) 21:33, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- First, please stop creating new sections.
- Secondly, the only question you've actually asked, was answered in my original response. If your talking about the comment you made regarding being in contact with Cardiff Harbour or Waterfront Partners, I ignored it because your obviously grasping at straws (especially since it's Saturday). - Happysailor (Talk) 21:48, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- You haven't answered all my questions and yes I also await others comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32bar (talk • contribs) 21:33, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- ok, ill answer these point by point:
Its clear to me that Wikipedia moderators haven't a clue about our home town, of which I have been born & bred in. The information on the wikipedia cardiff bay page is wrong! As for it being a Saturday, what's that got to do with anything? Clutching at straws? How rude. It is worth noting that it was YOU that mentioned waterfront partnerships and not me, so if you are not in contact with them, then how on earth (especially given that you are based in DALLAS!) would you even know of their existence?? I think you should stick to being a comedian because your making me laugh mate!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32bar (talk • contribs) 22:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the laugh, wasn't sure i'd laugh that hard today since we lost...
- So you now say that the Cardiff Bay page is wrong, why? because your website was removed from it? Yes I mentioned the waterfront partners, their logo appears on the 'official' visitcardiffbay website, which I found by following the usual official format of pages (visitwales, visitcardiff, visitcardiffbay). Not sure why you think I'm in Dallas (yet another assumption)
- and with that, I'm closing this as it's going nowhere. - Happysailor (Talk) 22:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Disambiguation link notification for January 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited J/80, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dartmouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Stockholm entry
Hello,
I only added a missing sign (|) to the Stockholm entry, so that the climate section wouldn't look like a complete mess (please take a look at it). Some anonymous user has been messing with climate sections in several entries (Stockholm, Portland OR) and I thought something should be done about it.
Traforad (talk) 15:03, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- While that may have been your intention, you actually removed the climate chart from the article. I have added the missing '|' into the climate data for you. Please be more careful with your edits in future so as not to remove content unnecessarily. Happy editing! - Happysailor (Talk) 15:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Re: Removing Speedy at Shanzaihou Military Housing Complex
The valid reason for the removal have given in the talk page.---Howard61313 (talk) 17:20, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- and I have replied. That is not a valid reason. page moves should be done as per WP:MOVE - Happysailor (Talk) 17:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- The name "Shanzaihou Military Housing Complex" was used for the Military Housing anyway, it's the truth on history. If a redirection is not allowed, no other ways I know at this moment. Any OTHER suggestion?---Howard61313 (talk) 17:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- Have you read what I posted both here, the article's talk page and on your talk page? If it's the correct title, then the page can be moved to the title, however this should be done correctly, not by taking the contents of the original article and starting a new one with it, then redirecting the original which is what you did.
- The only way for the article to be moved now is for the new article you created to be deleted to make way for the original article to be moved to the correct title. I really suggest you read WP:MOVE#How_to_move_a_page - Happysailor (Talk) 17:35, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- All right. So my mistake is the way I redirect them? What about redirecting "Shanzaihou Military Housing Complex" to "Yangmingshan American Military Housing"? Is there anything I can do to make it correct? (Sorry about the poor ability I understanding English....not a native user) --Howard61313 (talk) 17:38, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- No, the mistake was the way you tried to move the page. I'm assuming that Shanzaihou Military Housing Complex is meant to be the correct name? If so, then it has to be deleted before you can move the page using the move page feature of wikipedia (as per my above link). If it's not the correct title, and Yangmingshan American Military Housing is correct, then I'll remove the deletion tag off the complex article - Happysailor (Talk) 17:48, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- All right. So my mistake is the way I redirect them? What about redirecting "Shanzaihou Military Housing Complex" to "Yangmingshan American Military Housing"? Is there anything I can do to make it correct? (Sorry about the poor ability I understanding English....not a native user) --Howard61313 (talk) 17:38, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- The name "Shanzaihou Military Housing Complex" was used for the Military Housing anyway, it's the truth on history. If a redirection is not allowed, no other ways I know at this moment. Any OTHER suggestion?---Howard61313 (talk) 17:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)