User talk:Mars24
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sergio Asenjo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Sergio Asenjo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Mars24! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Ramón García (TV host) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:12, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
I could not find a note of the certification change on the PROMUSICAE page but I presume you have a reliable source, and I did see some other sources mention 40,000 as the current threshold, so I did not revert it, but I'd appreciate it if you could add a reliable source. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 10:02, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'm afraid PROMUSICAE has not released a press note for the certification change, but you can still see the new certification threshold at the bottom of the page in this week's official albums chart: http://www.promusicae.org/files/listassemanales/albumes/Top%20100%20albumes%20(PUBLICAR)_w43.2011.pdf --Mars24 (talk) 17:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- That's problematic since it does tell us if the change was in October, November or earlier. What I have is this showing 40,000 in November. For now I added the charts as a source, I hope we can find something better in the future. --Muhandes (talk) 14:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Los Premios 40 Principales 2011 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- There is no context for this article, no prose. It is simply a list of, presumably, winners of an award show (I think, again, the fact I can't tell from the article is telling). This is a list and wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of lists of award show winners.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shadowjams (talk) 20:22, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)