User talk:NappyJohnson

Welcome!

Hello, NappyJohnson! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! lifebaka++ 18:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

WP:ANI#Sockpuppetry and disruption on passive smoking: request outside administrative eyes

Hello, NappyJohnson. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. lifebaka++ 18:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SonofFeanor. Thank you. Soxwon (talk) 18:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NappyJohnson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I returned to wikipedia today to find that I have been blocked from editing following two "undo" edits I made regarding a factually incorrect statement on the "passive smoking" page. I have been watching these discussions go back and forth for a while and after repeated changes that continued to propogate bias on the page I elected create an account and make a change (which was immediately changed I might add). I am a unique person and am tired of seeing people with valid points shouted down on this specific page because their opinions are not shared by other editors. My understanding is that I have been blocked as a result of sockpuppetry and I hope this clearly shows that I am not a sockpuppet and in fact a unique, individual editor. It appears that I have stepped into a hornets nest, but still feel individuals should be able to provide evidence in support of a statement and have that evidence lead to a change for the better in a given page. If there are other issues aside from the sockpuppetry accusation I am prepared to respond to those as well.

Decline reason:

You were canvassed off-wiki to join an edit war--something which is frowned upon here. Blueboy 96 21:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.