User talk:Nemissimo
The article Terence Sellers has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhomb (talk) 22:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Jimbo's image policy
[edit]I already saw that on Commons Village Pump; it doesn't really affect me personally, since most of the images I've uploaded, or images on articles that I watch closely, are not photographic, or if photographic, are not really too directly so-called "prurient" (Image:The_Gor_Project_1_by_mjranum_stock.jpg is about as racy as it gets). I don't know that I have a great interest in leaping into the debate... AnonMoos (talk) 00:54, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Party because I'm not sure whether such debating will have much influence on the final outcome. I have about 9,000 pages on my Wikimedia Commons watchlist, and if any images are deleted for what I consider to be strikingly off-target reasons, or if any images which I consider to be very important are deleted, I will take up their cases... AnonMoos (talk) 01:29, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. I see your point. Kind regards --Nemissimo (talk) 01:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
The article Wendy Swanscombe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable person, unreferenced, not even clear that this is a real person
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 16:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
SCNR..
[edit]
... you know I really like your work and miss you badly in the DE-WP. Yes Sir!
Poisend-Ivy (talk) 19:04, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hey, that's a cute one.^^ Congrats on your new project! Women's contributions are really what our project needs dearly... I miss working with you guys, guess the BDSM discussion got closer to me than I thought. Kind Regards --Nemissimo (talk) 10:15, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| good, thought provoking citation Wikipietime (talk) 00:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Nemissimo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)