User talk:Nice Stories

Yeah I am a furry.

Nice Stories, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nice Stories! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

2020 Daytona Grand Prix moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2020 Daytona Grand Prix, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 03:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Nice Stories, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:07, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Henry Stickmin Collection

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Henry Stickmin Collection requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://henrystickmin.fandom.com/wiki/The_Henry_Stickmin_Collection and https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=DOJbX__DFd-X4-EP162duA8&q=The+Henry+Stickmin+Collection+is+a+2020+compilation+game+featuring+remakes+of+five+games+in+the+popular+Newgrounds+flash+game+series+Henry+Stickmin%2C+alongside+a+new+game%2C+%22Completing+the+Mission%22%2C+which+is+meant+to+be+a+finale+for+the+series.+The+game+was+developed+by+PuffballsUnited+and+was+released+on+August+7%2C+2020.+&oq=The+Henry+Stickmin+Collection+is+a+2020+compilation+game+featuring+remakes+of+five+games+in+the+popular+Newgrounds+flash+game+series+Henry+Stickmin%2C+alongside+a+new+game%2C+%22Completing+the+Mission%22%2C+which+is+meant+to+be+a+finale+for+the+series.+The+game+was+developed+by+PuffballsUnited+and+was+released+on+August+7%2C+2020.+&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQA1D-P1j-P2DiQmgAcAB4AIABAIgBAJIBAJgBAKABAqABAaoBB2d3cy13aXo&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwj_-eOv_OHrAhXfyzgGHddWB_cQ4dUDCAY&uact=5. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mamushir (talk) 20:48, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Henry Stickmin Collection for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Henry Stickmin Collection is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Henry Stickmin Collection until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chrisnait (talk | contribs) 18:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FinCEN Files, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolas Cantu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nicolas Cantu, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 16:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Unseamly: The Investigation of Peter Nygard,

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Unseamly: The Investigation of Peter Nygard,. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Unseamly: The Investigation of Peter Nygard. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Unseamly: The Investigation of Peter Nygard. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ... discospinster _talk 17:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Your edit to Trevor Milton has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:22, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2020 Daytona Grand Prix

Hello, Nice Stories. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2020 Daytona Grand Prix".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ShinyHunters

The article ShinyHunters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is not something you would find on Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hockeycatcat (talk) 11:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm El Rolo Ueeqee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sr. Knowthing ¿señor? 18:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Kinahan

Hi, I reverted your edit at Daniel Kinahan as the cited source reads that "has fled Dubai" rather than "has fled to Dubai". Perhaps the phrasing wasn't clear enough, but it meant that he had fled from Dubai. Perhaps adding "from" to the current phrasing would make that a little clearer. Autarch (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Trumpism without explanation

Thank you. soibangla (talk) 17:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NFT history wildly wrong, please help

Hi. I saw that you recently edited the "NFT" article and am seeking your help to correct some promotional suppression activity that has gone on there.

You see, the first NFT project ever was Etheria.world, deployed in October 2015. This information is verifiable on the blockchain itself (ultimate, mathematical truth) but is also noted in this RS Techcrunch article (towards the bottom): https://techcrunch.com/2021/04/08/the-cult-of-cryptopunks/

Problem is there are other later projects that have built their brand around being "first" and have continually deleted all mentions of Etheria from NFT Wikipedia entry's History section.

There are other big problems with the article: colored coins are literally fungible (the opposite of NFT), for one thing. This means that all early trading card mentions (which were, technically, just ERC-20-like coins with many copies) shouldn't even be in the entry. Anil Dash/Kevin McCoy's experiment is a legit cryptoart "pointer" NFT with on-chain metadata, but was not a "project" like Etheria, Kitties, Punks, etc. It deserves a mention, IMO, but Etheria is clearly the first NFT "project" by almost 2 years.

Would you be able to help set the record straight? Christie's and Cryptopunks have a major auction coming up on May 13 where they are going to claim "first" project and the Wikipedia entry should reflect the truth for anyone seeking it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User5109nfsaln (talk • contribs) 19:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tea channel (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Atlantic, Vox and "Welcome to the Circus" (Vulture) are good, but I think we need more sources using the phrase "tea channel" (or "drama channel" or a synonym) and talking about them very generally, like giving a history of tea channels or an analysis of their incentives/how they arose, not just specifically about (e.g.) Charles and Westbrook. I think this topic is notable, but the sources aren't there yet.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tea channel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tea channel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 12:39, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People acquitted of domestic viokence

A tag has been placed on Category:People acquitted of domestic viokence indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:29, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Acroterion (talk) 12:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:BLPCRIME. An arrest warrant is a series of allegations, not a conviction. If and when Mingo is convicted, a condensed discussion of events would be appropriate. Acroterion (talk) 12:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People acquitted of domestic violence has been nominated for merging

Category:People acquitted of domestic violence has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Brandon Brown (racing driver), may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. There is a Request for Comment on the talk page of the article that you are welcome to participate in. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 18:59, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Esposito moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ben Esposito, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 06:03, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Your edit to Critical race theory has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 20:06, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Video games set in 2083 has been nominated for discussion

Category:Video games set in 2083 has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SYTNH at WarnerMedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:20, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cameron Herrin

The article Cameron Herrin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as per WP:PERP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:09, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual crime subsection at Roblox

Hello,

I've reverted your addition of a subsection about virtual crime at the Roblox page. I believe you added it in good faith, but it may not be WP:DUE to go into detail about every individual instance of virtual crime reported over the years.

The various sources demonstrate that it is due to describe the phenomenon of simulated crime on Roblox, but given that this article is about Roblox itself, it is not due to dedicate an excessive amount of space detailing any one incident of it unless a single instance of virtual crime garnered a lot of attention on its own.

It's better to more generally describe virtual crime somewhere else in the article.

I hope you'll understand. Thank you,

Vanilla Wizard 💙 22:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cameron Herrin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cameron Herrin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Herrin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 03:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nicolas Cantu

Hello, Nice Stories. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nicolas Cantu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Thumbnail of Line Goes Up – The Problem With NFTs.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Thumbnail of Line Goes Up – The Problem With NFTs.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy! Concerning the use of promotional/public relations perspectives in technology pages

I appreciate your enthusiasm in editing technology-related pages, but I feel many edits of yours err on the side of inserting the views of self-promotional ladder climbers (like Matthew Ball on the metaverse) and other problematic sources that lack an appropriate encyclopedic perspective if inserted uncritically. The example I bring here is Matthew Ball, a technology blogger and self-described "metaverse expert" who is transparently fixated on the promotion and growth of metaverses and metaverse companies at large. In a New York Times article that covered the various perspectives around metaverses, you singled out Ball's judgements on what constitutes marketing language and inserted Ball's perspective by a lede segment that elaborated on the use of "metaverse" as a buzzword. Putting the vapid and unelaborated ramblings of a tech evangelist in the lede of the page is very undue, and happens to be a great example of edit creep. Please keep your edits a single, productive unit of change on a page and not something to mop up afterwards. Mewnst (talk) 22:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 22:30, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings including a final warning in November, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a statement describing how copyright applies to Wikipedia, show that you understand our copyright policy, and make a commitment to follow it in the future.— Diannaa (talk) 22:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright applies to all parts of wikipedia that do not use the Creative Commons attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License or is considered fair use. I have come to understand Wikipedia's copyright policies and pledge to follow the policies in the future. Nice Stories (talk) 15:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Images are subject to copyright unless they fall in the public domain. Nice Stories (talk) 15:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright on Wikipedia also applies when reusing text and uploading non-free images. Nice Stories (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Nice Stories (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Copyright applies to all parts of wikipedia that do not use the Creative Commons attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Copyright on Wikipedia also applies when reusing text and uploading non-free images. Images are subject to copyright unless they fall in the public domain. I have come to understand Wikipedia's copyright policies and pledge to follow the policies in the future. Nice Stories (talk) 15:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Accepting after reviewing second unblock request. — Diannaa (talk) 15:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am curious I have appealed an unblock based on the instructions on this talk page and nothing seems to be happening so far. Also can the blocking administrator of myself be consulted as part of this appeal? Nice Stories (talk) 12:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also I am asking for a second chance thing here. Nice Stories (talk) 19:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer the questions below.— Diannaa (talk) 19:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did so in the unblock message. Nice Stories (talk) 14:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I said "Copyright applies to all parts of wikipedia that do not use the Creative Commons attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Copyright on Wikipedia also applies when reusing text and uploading non-free images. Images are subject to copyright unless they fall in the public domain. I have come to understand Wikipedia's copyright policies and pledge to follow the policies in the future." Nice Stories (talk) 14:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like is there something wrong with it? Nice Stories (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't answer the question "What is copyright?" and most of it is incorrect. — Diannaa (talk) 19:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright is a type of ittilectrial property that gives its owner the exclusive right to copy or distribute a creative work. Copyright is designed to protect the original Creative expression of an idea in a creative work but not said idea. Copyright is subject to limitations based on public interest considerations such as the fair use doctrine. On Wikipedia there is permission to modify, copy, or distribute Wikipedia's text under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and, if noted, the GNU Free Documentation, unversioned, with no invariant sections, back cover texts, or front-cover texts. A copy of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 unported license and the GNU free documentation license is included in the sections titled "Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License" and "GNU Free Documentation License". Disclaimers cover content on Wikipedia. On Wikipedia Non-free content can be used only if it's usage would be seen as fair use under U.S. copyright law and complies with the Non-free content criteria; It is used for a purpose cannot be done by free material; and has valid reasoning as to why its usage would be viewed as fair use under U.S. law and Wikipedia policy. I have come to understand Wikipedia's copyright policies and pledge to follow the policies in the future.

Nice Stories (talk) 04:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There I have tried again Nice Stories (talk) 04:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually ignore that my real reply is in the next section. Nice Stories (talk) 05:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I have a temporary block instead?

Yeah, I noticed I was indefinitely blocked for copyright concerns and I didn't notice that was issue until today. I am curious can I have my ban expire in like 6 months to 2 years from now on the promise I will never do it again or I get permanently banned? Also I barely check on talk page and I promise to regularly use it if I get reinstated. Nice Stories (talk) 15:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Nevermond Nice Stories (talk) 15:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, "indefinite" is not "permanent". It just means that it will run until there is a successful appeal Nosebagbear (talk) 15:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Nice Stories (talk) 02:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I did not see your unblock request, sorry about that. In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. Please respond to the following questions, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked.— Diannaa (talk) 20:18, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Nice Stories (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Copyright is a type of ittilectrial property that gives its owner the exclusive right to copy or distribute a creative work. Copyright is designed to protect the original Creative expression of an idea in a creative work but not said idea. Copyright is subject to limitations based on public interest considerations such as the fair use doctrine. On Wikipedia there is permission to modify, copy, or distribute Wikipedia's text under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and, if noted, the GNU Free Documentation, unversioned, with no invariant sections, back cover texts, or front-cover texts. A copy of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 unported license and the GNU free documentation license is included in the sections titled "Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License" and "GNU Free Documentation License". Disclaimers cover content on Wikipedia. On Wikipedia Non-free content can be used only if it's usage would be seen as fair use under U.S. copyright law and complies with the Non-free content criteria; It is used for a purpose cannot be done by free material; and has valid reasoning as to why its usage would be viewed as fair use under U.S. law and Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia's text and many image are mainly co-licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). Copyrighted text is not allowed on Wikipedia since database servers are located in the United States and is therefore subject to U.S. copyright law and therefore must not host content that infringes on that law. I intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future by not directly copying text onto Wikipedia unless it is allowed based on Wikipedia's non-free content policy and to only use non-free images unless it is also allowed based on Wikipedia non-free content policy. I have come to understand Wikipedia's copyright policies and pledge to follow the policies in the future.Nice Stories (talk) 04:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Your response shows you have taken the time to read about and understand copyright and how it applies to Wikipedia. Please be aware I will be checking your edits every day for the foreseeable future. — Diannaa (talk) 15:02, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Stories (talk) 04:26, 5 March 2022

There I updated the unblock request Nice Stories (talk) 06:35, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contributor copyright investigation opened

As a result of concerns regarding copyright violations in your edits, I have opened Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Nice Stories, which has been filled out with your edits in order to review them for copyright issues. Contributor copyright investigations can stay open for long periods of time due to a large current backlog and low number of volunteers. Participation in the investigation, such as providing guidance for which edits you copied from your sources, can help expedite the process. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌵CCI guide} 18:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I am curious can this lead to a parament ban? Nice Stories (talk)

No, the investigation will not lead to a block on you- it's based on your past edits, which you were already blocked and unblocked for- there's not need to block you for anything found there, it's already been adressed. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌵CCI guide} 21:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Nice Stories (talk) 00:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Max Verstappen, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! TylerBurden (talk) 14:44, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ben Esposito

Hello, Nice Stories. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ben Esposito, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm Jurta. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Baba Is You, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jurta talk 07:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Solar Opposites, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jurta talk 09:50, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Decision (TV program), you may be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 04:58, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ben Esposito

Hello, Nice Stories. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ben Esposito".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yellow-line rule for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yellow-line rule is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellow-line rule until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FMecha (to talk|to see log) 13:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

––FormalDude talk 07:06, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dallas Mavericks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 09:40, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Come Along with Me (Adventure Time) Episode Title Card.webp listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Come Along with Me (Adventure Time) Episode Title Card.webp, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:03, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:500cc/MotoGP World Riders' Champions

A tag has been placed on Category:500cc/MotoGP World Riders' Champions indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Pit Crew Challenge

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pit Crew Challenge, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Pit Crew Challenge

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pit Crew Challenge, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:When We Were Young (festival) poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:When We Were Young (festival) poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on NASCAR playoffs

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page NASCAR playoffs, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Malik Sanchez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malik Sanchez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malik Sanchez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 16:51, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, NASCAR 2001, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:BURDEN Waxworker (talk) 08:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Video games designed by Thomas Mahler has been nominated for renaming

Category:Video games designed by Thomas Mahler has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. OceanHok (talk) 09:14, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please take more care with your edits

Hi there, I came across one of your edits yesterday which was poorly written almost to the point of being unintelligible, as well as completely unsourced. Unfortunately, this seems to be somewhat common among your edits: more than half of the time when you are adding a sentence or more, there are multiple errors in what you're writing (often, you do not even use full sentences, capitalization, and correct spelling, and the tone of your writing is usually far too informal for an encyclopedia).

You seem to be really good at making changes like updates to existing text, sometimes things that I don't know how to do yet! So I am definitely not trying to accuse you of not contributing properly. That being said, there are numerous errors to correct from inserting text that you did not seem to preview before submitting, and most importantly, statements which are just your viewpoint and not sourced to any references are bad for the encyclopedia. I'd ask that you take more care when making changes, especially when you're adding original writing of your own, and to *always* cite a Reliable Source if you are adding new information or ideas to an article. Thanks, and happy editing! Chiselinccc (talk) 14:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chrysler World Headquarters and Technology Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeep Grand Wagoneer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Friday Night Funkin' Ludum Dare Prototype logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Friday Night Funkin' Ludum Dare Prototype logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]