Jump to content

User talk:TrademarkedTWOrantula

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
36 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Castaic Lake (talk) Add sources
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Table Mountain (Butte County, California) (talk) Add sources
10 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Morgan Hill Unified School District (talk) Add sources
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start County Line Road (Santa Clara–Stanislaus counties, California) (talk) Add sources
107 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C American Discovery Trail (talk) Add sources
36 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA California State Route 152 (talk) Add sources
175 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Morgan Hill, California (talk) Cleanup
19 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Alameda Creek (talk) Cleanup
55 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Oak Ridge High School (El Dorado Hills, California) (talk) Cleanup
166 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Santa Clara Valley (talk) Expand
18 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C MotoGP 15 (talk) Expand
20 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Bay Area Ridge Trail (talk) Expand
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start SBK X: Superbike World Championship (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,259 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Crossword (talk) Unencyclopaedic
149 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Richmond High School (Richmond, California) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,246 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Standard Chinese (talk) Merge
3,220 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Portuguese language (talk) Merge
38,046 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Google (talk) Merge
16 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Rancho San Antonio County Park (talk) Wikify
21 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Pioneer High School (San Jose, California) (talk) Wikify
25 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Games World of Puzzles (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Valley Water Mill Pond (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Fightin' Words (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kern Canyon (Stanislaus County) (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Los Gatos Creek Park (talk) Stub
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Joseph D. Grant County Park (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Vasona Reservoir (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Hellyer County Park (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Coyote Lake (Santa Clara County, California) (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Salmon Creek Falls (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
472 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Freddy Fazbear's Pizzeria Simulator (talk) Add sources
101 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Adam Montoya (talk) Add sources
199 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Unturned (talk) Add sources
38 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Video game writing (talk) Add sources
323 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Tactical role-playing game (talk) Add sources
179 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Clickteam (talk) Add sources
881 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Annoying Orange (talk) Cleanup
683 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Little Nightmares II (talk) Cleanup
200 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Red Ventures (talk) Cleanup
374 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Human: Fall Flat (talk) Expand
60 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C MagnaCarta 2 (talk) Expand
10,460 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA PlayStation 5 (talk) Expand
867 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Five Nights at Freddy's: Sister Location (talk) Unencyclopaedic
240 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Sex differences in human physiology (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,865 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Scott Cawthon (talk) Unencyclopaedic
995 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA HP Inc. (talk) Merge
1,139 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Bethesda Game Studios (talk) Merge
46 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Bethesda Game Studios Austin (talk) Merge
363 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Algerian Air Force (talk) Wikify
138 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Crypt of the NecroDancer (talk) Wikify
307 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Microtransaction (talk) Wikify
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Rocket Robo (talk) Orphan
64 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C 20 Minutes Till Dawn (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Toasty: Ashes of Dusk (talk) Orphan
32 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Tucker Boner (talk) Stub
296 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C One Piece Odyssey (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Contemporanul (talk) Stub
36 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Hue (video game) (talk) Stub
25 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Ronimo Games (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub UNIVAC EXEC I (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:08, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robbery Bob has been accepted

[edit]
Robbery Bob, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:24, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to subscribe to the WikiCup newsletter

[edit]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover art of Bit Pilot, Zach Gage, 2010.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cover art of Bit Pilot, Zach Gage, 2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Letterpress (video game)

[edit]

On 15 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Letterpress (video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while developing the sound effects for Letterpress, Loren Brichter spit in his microphone? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Letterpress (video game). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Letterpress (video game)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:MrBeast/GA1

[edit]

Hey! I've noticed you closed the nomination above, but it doesn't seem to be closed for a valid reason. The review was started on 20 December and you posted a single suggestion on 1 January. Then on 23 January, it was suddenly closed as fail for the nominator being inactive for 7 days. But you barely even had started reviewing the article yet. The nominator wasn't even pinged or anything. These closes should only happen when the nomination is put on hold (so after the review is done) and the nominator fails to respond in a timely manner, but they had nothing to respond to begin with. I believe this close should be clarified. Skyshiftertalk 04:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bruh. I'm gonna trout myself for that. trout Self-trout TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 04:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The point isn't to ping the nominator, but rather the reason the review was failed for, as I explained above. It is invalid to close a nomination for the nominator being inactive when you haven't even finished your review. If you just wanted to stop reviewing, you could've stated so instead. Skyshiftertalk 11:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't get anything TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 00:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What did you not get? I explained above: "It is invalid to close a nomination for the nominator being inactive when you haven't even finished your review." I initially thought of posting the failed nomination directly at WT:GAN, but wanted to try to resolve with you directly first. Skyshiftertalk 00:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now I get it. Thanks; will take into consideration for future GA reviews. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 02:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Backlog drives/February 2024/Reviews

[edit]

Hi, and thanks for participating in this backlog drive! Just wanted to let you know that the review page is for editors to review references added by other editors. As in, a reviewer will randomly select an edit from a random editor to review, rather than you posting your edit there. The reviewed edits will then go under the reviewer's section. I've reviewed the 4 edits you posted there as an example. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thanks! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 02:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhhhh I thought it was like the WikiCup where you add everything you've done. Did not know that. Thanks, TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 02:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

[edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome TrademarkedTWOrantula! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:56, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

WikiCup 2024 February newsletter

[edit]

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Infinite Craft has been accepted

[edit]
Infinite Craft, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much

[edit]

... for verifying so many articles! Your work helps make the drive secure against fraud attempts and false submissions. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you're so very welcome ^-^ TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 03:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beretta 9000 for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beretta 9000 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beretta 9000 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chris Troutman (talk) 19:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TrademarkedTWOrantula, I wanted to emphasize my sorrow at screwing you out of the point you deservedly earned for adding a source to the article. I PROD'd the thing with the idea that by the time the PROD expired, the month would be over and you'd have that point. Sadly, someone reverted my PROD so I had to defend my honor in that regard. I had reviewed your citation so hopefully you will be recompensated although the entry may drop from your log before then. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's aight man. I have a ton of articles I'm glad that they're referenced. We all make mistakes. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 02:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angels in the Infield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page McFarland. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 March newsletter

[edit]

The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A citation barnstar for you

[edit]
The Citation Barnstar The Citation Barnstar
For good work during WP: FEB24 drive! Davidindia (talk) 15:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for my (technically first) barnstar! TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 23:48, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Robbery Bob

[edit]

On 3 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robbery Bob, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a reviewer thought that the video game Robbery Bob contained cringeworthy dialogue? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robbery Bob. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Robbery Bob), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

[edit]

Citation Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to TrademarkedTWOrantula for collecting more than 200 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Wonderputt

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wonderputt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NegativeMP1 -- NegativeMP1 (talk) 12:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Wonderputt

[edit]

The article Wonderputt you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wonderputt and Talk:Wonderputt/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NegativeMP1 -- NegativeMP1 (talk) 20:04, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Wonderputt

[edit]

The article Wonderputt you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wonderputt for comments about the article, and Talk:Wonderputt/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NegativeMP1 -- NegativeMP1 (talk) 20:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Squabble (video game)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Squabble (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A412 -- A412 (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Squabble (video game)

[edit]

The article Squabble (video game) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Squabble (video game) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A412 -- A412 (talk) 20:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Ride into the Mountains has been accepted

[edit]
A Ride into the Mountains, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 05:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Overboard! (2021 video game) has been accepted

[edit]
Overboard! (2021 video game), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 13:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Little to the Left has been accepted

[edit]
A Little to the Left, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OceanHok (talk) 14:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Arcadia has been accepted

[edit]
American Arcadia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter

[edit]

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Grimace's Birthday

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grimace's Birthday you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cukie Gherkin -- Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Grimace's Birthday

[edit]

The article Grimace's Birthday you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grimace's Birthday for comments about the article, and Talk:Grimace's Birthday/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cukie Gherkin -- Cukie Gherkin (talk) 03:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sweet Rose Creamery has been accepted

[edit]
Sweet Rose Creamery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-- NotCharizard 🗨 08:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

something to ask

[edit]

thanks for asking me a good question on this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Entertainment#a_question_to_some_people but i cant go on the lost media wiki so i'll use wikipedia 2A02:8084:EA4:2B80:3DA5:C984:9F99:4E81 (talk) 21:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. If you have GoAnimate, perhaps you could recreate the video as described by the script? TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 22:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i can't recreate it sadly 2A02:8084:EA4:2B80:ADA8:E8D7:BCB8:8F5B (talk) 21:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If I may ask, why could you not create an account on the Lost Media Wiki? TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 22:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i only go on this site and some wikis which have fandom users talking to other users so im afraid i cant 2A02:8084:EA4:2B80:ADA8:E8D7:BCB8:8F5B (talk) 21:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter

[edit]

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note!

[edit]

I am going to enforce a Wikibreak, as I am about to graduate from school. My grades are (unfortunately) a little low, so I have to temporarily leave Wikipedia. Why don't you try finishing or improving one of my written articles? See y'all in about a month. Peace, TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 05:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the EFFP report: Try logging in to your account, when the enforcer says bye, don't click on okay, instead immediately go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TrademarkedTWOrantula?action=edit&safemode=1 to edit your userpage. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 04:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, since you are on a WikiBreak due to school, you should stop trying to edit your userpage during that time! (ignore me this is a scolding) 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 04:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logging in

[edit]

Please remember to log in to your account, as it appears that you have created two drafts, one via you account and one by the above IP address. Best wishes on recovering your grades. David notMD (talk) 04:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that

[edit]

Hello TWOrantula,

Sorry, didn't mean to scare you off FAC reviewing! I couldn't sleep last night and was probably in a grumpy mood, so apologies if that came off as harsher than intended. More FAC reviewers is generally a good thing.

That said, my comment wasn't totally off-base. My suggestion is that if you're commenting on prose, make clear the difference between "suggestions" /"thoughts" and "this is genuinely a problem, please fix it, I will probably oppose if you ignore this." You were using commanding language like "Change" as an order, so it's going to come off as the latter by default. If what you meant was more like "Here are some alternate ways to phrase things to think about, it's up to you", then there'd have been no problem. If that's what you were thinking, I definitely recommend including a disclaimer at the top of future reviews saying that, and then making clear passages that you really think are a problem. For an example, I made such a disclaimer at my review at Talk:Sands of Destruction/GA1, and made various suggestions in my review, many of which were changed or sometimes ignored by the nominator. And it was fine! I passed it anyway. They were just suggestions, after all.

But yeah. One of the things about FAC is that it's a pretty high-stress environment for nominators. There's often times 20 different ways to phrase the same thought, all valid, and there's nothing more soul-killing than reviewers basically distrusting the nominator's own judgment & personal preference and asking it to be changed from style 4 to style 8 to style 17 and back, despite none of them really being an improvement. That's the high-minded reason to be careful with prose suggestions.

I wish you good luck reviewing in the future! SnowFire (talk) 17:18, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter

[edit]

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chained Together has been accepted

[edit]
Chained Together, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

λ NegativeMP1 07:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Clustertruck

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clustertruck you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IceWelder -- IceWelder (talk) 17:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gameplay screenshot of Letterpress video game, part one.jpeg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gameplay screenshot of Letterpress video game, part one.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gameplay screenshot of Letterpress video game, part two.jpeg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gameplay screenshot of Letterpress video game, part two.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Clustertruck

[edit]

The article Clustertruck you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Clustertruck for comments about the article, and Talk:Clustertruck/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IceWelder -- IceWelder (talk) 18:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in the July 2024 GAN backlog drive

[edit]
The Minor Barnstar
Your noteworthy contribution (6 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 160 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 11:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Me at the zoo thumbnail.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Me at the zoo thumbnail.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts for Deletion

[edit]

You have nominated two drafts for deletion. What I would like to know is whether you were reviewing drafts as a New Page Patrol reviewer, as an Articles for Creation reviewer, or in some other way. Drafts are not deleted for lack of notability. Drafts that are submitted are declined for lack of notability. Nominating drafts for deletion because of a lack of notability wastes the time of the nominator and the MFD reviewers. So what I would like to know is how to minimize the number of these well-intentioned but misguided nominations of drafts for deletion for notability. What sort of review were you doing? I am wondering whether we can provide clearer instructions about how to review and not review drafts. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After deleting the draft page "Object show" (found here), I figured that the two pages (which I had happened to come across) happened to cover a subject that is banned from Wikipedia. I thought that these pages needed to be deleted immediately, so I said that they "weren't notable". TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 21:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Clustertruck

[edit]

On 8 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Clustertruck, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the idea for Clustertruck came from a developer wanting to escape traffic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Clustertruck. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Clustertruck), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 01:55, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

[edit]

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yellow Taxi Goes Vroom has been accepted

[edit]
Yellow Taxi Goes Vroom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Async Corp.

[edit]

The article Async Corp. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Async Corp. for comments about the article, and Talk:Async Corp./GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How the heck...????? TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 04:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Me at the zoo thumbnail.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Me at the zoo thumbnail.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Please Fix the Road has been accepted

[edit]
Please Fix the Road, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

B.Korlah (talk) 12:07, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Does Not Commute has been accepted

[edit]
Does Not Commute, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 November newsletter

[edit]

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Canada Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and Christmas Island AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

[edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome TrademarkedTWOrantula! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 13:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Times that 700 Wikipedians supported something

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Times that 700 Wikipedians supported something indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. – robertsky (talk) 13:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TrademarkedTWOrantula&oldid=1257145694"