Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 16:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODed by article creator because the journal "has been a member of the Committee of Publication Ethics (COPE) since 2018 [1]. The journal follows high publication and ethic standards recommended by this organization (this is why it couldn't be regarded as a predatory journal, but instead it is a legitimate scientific journal. References have been supplemented." None of this goes even slightly towards fulfilling either GNG or NJournals. Therefore PROD reason still stands, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete or merge to University of Łódź. 11:19, 17 February 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Headbomb (talk • contribs)
- Delete Per nom. Fails WP:NJournals. QED. Britishfinance (talk) 15:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.