Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-Ukrainian Supreme Legal Council

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:19, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All-Ukrainian Supreme Legal Council (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization. There is no indication that this is a notable law organization in Ukraine. Google searches in both English and Ukrainian result in no significant coverage. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is a Supreme Council of Justice (Вища рада юстиції) within the Ukrainian government. This present organization should not be confused with that governmental organization. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
All-Ukrainian Supreme Legal Council WikiDan61 The All-Ukrainian Supreme LEgal Council is a newly founded organization, so it's why it is Non-notable organization, yet. Our site was recently launched and it'is the reason Why Google searches are no significant coverage. Helga377
All-Ukrainian Supreme Legal Council is different from [Supreme Council of Justice]. [AUSLC] is private organization, the aim of which is to supporte lawyers, give legal advice, represent interests of individuals, to cooperate with state authorities on issues of jurisprudense an so on. [Supreme Council of Justice] is an advising judicial and control-revisionary government body in Ukraine. The Supreme Council of Justice of Ukraine advises on the appointment or release of certain judges, examines the cases of infringements, and executes disciplinary proceedings involving judges of the Supreme Court of Ukraine and other high specialized courts.
Wow. I really can't understand why this content might be disputed. The sources seem genuine. Please explain in further detail the negative judgement. Rebekahalnablack —Preceding undated comment added 00:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
About our organization in media, however it is a newly founded organization, currently I can't show you any significant coverage. But in future it will. Sincerely, Helga377, 15:44, 9 December 2016
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 18:34, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.