Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana C. Reyes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 05:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ana C. Reyes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As a nominee, her WP:BIO notability is unclear. She is clearly going to be notable once she is confirmed. However, at the present, pending confirmation, she is not notable as a lawyer and not a legal academic of note. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 01:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Meets WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO Snickers2686 (talk) 03:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning move to draft. Per the WP:USCJN section on U.S. District Court judges, "Nominees whose nomination has not yet come to a vote are not inherently notable. In practice, most such nominees will be confirmed by the Senate, at which point their notability will become inherent". BD2412 T 06:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Law, and Washington, D.C.. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:17, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The Washington Post has a lengthy article on her from 2020 which details her finding the teacher who taught her English when she arrived in the United States. I have added the citation to the existing article. DaffodilOcean (talk) 13:48, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the article in the Washington Post is WP:SIGCOV, I also found two news articles discussing her time in California in 1996 working to defeat 1996 California Proposition 209; these have been added to the article along with information about two awards she has received. Hence, she meets WP:GNG even prior to the recent coverage of Biden's nomination of her to the district court. DaffodilOcean (talk) 03:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:HEY and WP:GNG/WP:BASIC - The 2020 WaPo article and other sources added by DaffodilOcean, and this 2022 article from The Hill: President Biden’s judicial nominee could become the first Hispanic woman and LGBTQ person to serve on the court sufficiently support notability. There is also: Lawyer Reunites with 'Extraordinary' 1st Grade Teacher Who Helped Her Learn English 40 Years Later (People, Nov. 2020). Beccaynr (talk) 05:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Beccaynr (talk) 05:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I think she meets WP:GNG. Marquardtika (talk) 18:58, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.