Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candy Quackenbush

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Books of Abarat#Candy Quackenbush. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Candy Quackenbush

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional character. GamerPro64 04:13, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Literature. GamerPro64 04:13, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep or upmerge to The Books of Abarat#Candy Quackenbush. Looper, The Mary Sue, and Slashfilm all name the character and cover some details, so V is clearly met. Scholar search finds Ford, Kim. "Titles that Tempt," Voices From the Middle; Urbana Vol. 15, Iss. 1, (Sep 2007): 54-55 but from the preview, that looks like a small review of the book, not a detailed treatment of the character, and Chance, Rosemary. "Book Mark It: Weird Worlds," Teacher Librarian; Bowie Vol. 30, Iss. 5, (Jun 2003): 11 gives a snippet review of the world, mentioning this character as protagonist. this is a good author interview with brief discussion of this character. So... V is unquestionably met, N is pretty borderline for this character. Jclemens (talk) 17:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: Looking for WP:ATD and to WP:PRESERVE. There should be something about this at the main article even if there isn't enough for a separate article. Archrogue (talk) 20:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.