Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copterline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Copterline Oy. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copterline

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article seems to be a duplicate of Copterline Oy. Not a very active user (talk) 08:48, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 08:48, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 08:48, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 08:48, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 08:48, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge This is quite confusing, but apparently this article was split by @Vuo: in 2012 because the Finnish company "Copterline Oy" went bankrupt but an Estonian company "Copterline OÜ" continued with the trademark. The Estonian company went bankrupt in 2016 as well. But given that both companies are now bankrupt, they used the same trademark and the histories are intertwined anyway, it should be merged. But care needs to be taken to take this history into account.--Pudeo (talk) 11:42, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge AfD is the wrong tool for this. Merge content from Copterline Oy to Copterline, not vice versa as suggested. Copterline Oy can be left as a redirect to Copterline. This is because Copterline OÜ effectively continued the history of Copterline Oy by serving as a vehicle for Line Support Oy, even if the formal legal identities do not coincide. --vuo (talk) 22:19, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.