Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F-WUAB (Airbus A300B4-203)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

F-WUAB (Airbus A300B4-203)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable aircraft. All three sources, one of which is unreliable, are just passing mentions and do not meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. There is no evidence why the 238th aircraft is notable. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Aviation, and France. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It's preserved in a museum so I suppose it could be a notable historical artifact... But I can't see much even in French about it [1] is a brief description. Oaktree b (talk) 23:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I found this source [2] 14.201.100.184 (talk) 00:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: this particular airframe does not meet GNG in its own right. The mention at Airbus A300 § Aircraft on display is sufficient; a standalone article is not justified per WP:NOPAGE. Rosbif73 (talk) 09:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Even as a preserved example it has been repainted to appear to be something that it isn't. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 00:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and merge - This article is new, and I suggest that someone update the article to have more significant coverage or even merge it with the A300B1 in preservation into one article. 14.201.100.184 (talk) 00:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve merged the content 14.201.100.184 (talk) 00:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And I've undone it.

There should be a consensus decision, to my understanding, before things like this are done.

I undid all three. The page you merged them into just passed AfC as a disambiguation page specifically.

Also, notes about deletion discussions on articles shouldn't just be removed. Please wait for consensus when there's a discussion about what should happen.

((Meanwhile, I know nothing about airplanes, so I have no vote on that matter. Now I'm off to fix the ref names b/c those articles "merging" caused a huge problem.)) OIM20 (talk) 06:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per GNG. Bhivuti45 (talk) 10:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.