Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Familie Leitner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Weighing up the opinions before and after improvement (as hinted at by Liz), there seems to be a consensus to keep this expanded version of the article. (non-admin closure) Schminnte ^{[talk to me]} 18:04, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Familie Leitner

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cites no sources, little non-trivial information can be found online, fails WP:GNG DirtyHarry991 (talk) 10:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Austria. DirtyHarry991 (talk) 10:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ~~I'da sent it to draft, FWIW...~~ Oh no I wouldn't - are you seriously telling me this has been a thing since 2011? Grief!!! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to be a notable long-lasting Austrian series.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep. The article does cite various reliable secondary sources about this indeed long-lasting series on the main national channel.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 15:36, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is a very different article than the one that existed at the time of nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: dramatic improvements in both content and sourcing changed this into a viable article. Those who voiced their opinion here on the day of the nomination: please take another look. Owen× ☎ 16:46, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as it seems there was a book written about it and several retrospective pieces published.

JoelleJay (talk) 20:51, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.