Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federal Party of Manipur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buidhe 02:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Party of Manipur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is very short and unreferenced. It has remained substantively unchanged since its creation in 2005. I propose that this article does not meet the criteria under WP:N. I have performed a search for references but have only found vague acknowledgements of its existence. One source suggests the party ceased to exist circa 2006. QuadColour (talk) 11:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. QuadColour (talk) 11:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. QuadColour (talk) 11:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Redirect to Gangmumei Kamei. The founder had won elections [1] so we have at least one victorious candidate who also happens to be the party chief. If there are no other winning candidates then it would be better to redirect this to the founder. If there are several other winning candidates then this can be kept, but right now I dont know for sure. QuadColour, do you have an answer to this question ? --Cedix (talk) 13:42, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't found any sources confirming any members of the party other than Kamei. I am happy to support redirecting to the Gangmumei Kamei page. QuadColour (talk) 14:04, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the reply QuadColour. Glad that both of us agree on the redirect. --Cedix (talk) 18:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
QuadColour, I have changed to keep due to the findings presented by Goldsztajn. In light of the new information, I suggest you to withdraw, so that this AfD can be speedily closed. --Cedix (talk) 18:15, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.