Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firstpost

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Firstpost

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website that has crisis with reliability.

The subject completely fails WP:NWEB. Editorkamran (talk) 11:57, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Companies, Websites, and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The website has enough content but I don't see significant coverage from reliable sources. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 03:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Originally closed as "soft delete". Reopened after being contested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:41, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- Major news organization in the second largest country in the world and widely cited by newspapers and academic journals. It is achieved at the Library of Congress see https://www.loc.gov/item/lcwaN0033319/. Additional Sources I found include a journal article 1.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:10, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above, this appears to be a fairly major publishing company. Kind of a challenge just getting past their own publications because of how prolific they are. - Indefensible (talk) 15:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the same reasons mentioned above. Regardless of its reliability within WP (and it is a reliable source, IMO, especially for its use on cinema-related articles), it is a notable publication, and easily merits the existence of a WP page for it. Shahid • ^Talk2me 15:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as pointed out above, clearly meets the notability criteria. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 15:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - including per WP:WEBCRIT - this article has expanded since the nomination to include additional reliable coverage that is independent of this online news portal. I am also able to access the JSTOR results cited above and this outlet appears to be routinely cited in a wide range of academic journals. Beccaynr (talk) 15:41, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable news outlet, backed by major corporations. --Soman (talk) 15:42, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG.LM2000 (talk) 18:58, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep why not? Okoslavia (talk) 22:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.