Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insight Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Insight Films

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. The article has one source from a box office site about their film, not the company itself. I don't see how this article should stay unless multiple in-depth proper sources are introduced. Producing one noteworthy film doesn't automatically give notability to the production company. X (talk) 05:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. X (talk) 05:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article now has multiple films and programmes produced included and a clearly outlined history of the production company, which provides evidence of its notability. There are citations from IMDB, which itself needs all information to be provided by authentic sources, as well as reviews from papers such as The Guardian and Screen international. Callyroader (talk) 15:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:NCORP. Of the sources in the article the majority are imdb and Wikipedia which are not reliable. The secondary sources cited do not contain significant coverage of this company. None of the company's productions appear to be notable and I was unable to find any additional sources that support this company's notability. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 02:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 06:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NCORP. The new version does not meet the basic criteria there, i.e. "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Being listed in an article about a movie or whatever does not qualify as _significant_, and I can't find any articles about this company that meet the criteria. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.