Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L5 (miniseries)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:38, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

L5 (miniseries)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A crowdfunded sci-fi mini-series uploaded to a video distribution website. Article not cited to relaible secondary sources and I can't see any suitable sources online. Clear failure of WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 02:18, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't really find anything to show that this miniseries really gained any true notice. There is the GFR blog entry, but the problem is that it's ultimately a blog entry and I can't find anything to show that this blog has an editorial process that would cause it to be considered a RS. Even if it did, that's just one source and we need more than that. Its Kickstarter was successful, but not so wildly successful that it'd gain notice from anyone on that front. This might be speedyable under WP:A7, since it looks to be a web based series and might fall under that qualification. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:28, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment: A bit pre-emptive to call this a "miniseries" as it has only one episode which has been released, or to suggest an A7 speedy as it somewhat sourcable. I have added a modified set of findsources above. I checked out the trailers, and this one looks quite professional and high caliber for its limited budget. Let's see if it has received attention. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 10:21, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.