Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lianozovo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:00, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Lianozovo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Lianozovo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A disambig page with only two items is invalid per WP:MOSDAB - Altenmann >talk 04:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

• Delete as per nomination. TH1980 (talk) 04:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disambiguations and Russia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

• Keep': A disambiguation page with two entries is perfectly valid, where neither of them is the obvious Primary Topic. PamD 08:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

• Keep as per PamD. Also, I'd like to add that Russian disambiguation page has 6 entries. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 16:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

  I have just merged Wikidata, so that now this disambiguation page has links to three other languages. It is weird that there was two Wikidata for Lianozovo disambiguation page, I had to first resolve conflicts with descriptions in multiple languages and only then it allowed me to merge. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 16:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

• Keep. Perfectly valid DAB page. Absolutely no need for deletion. The nom apparently misunderstood what is stated at MOS:DAB which indicates that A disambiguation page with only two meanings is not necessary if one of them is the primary topic for that term, and since neither of the entries listed is the primary topic then the page is completely necessary. CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

• Keep as per PamD and CycloneYoris. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 18:26, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.