Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurice Kremer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 04:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maurice Kremer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination for 217.150.87.242: No news coverage for Maurice Kremer. Only brief passing mentions of him. I have no opinion. Hut 8.5 17:27, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:36, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:56, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:57, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:20, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Editor nominated a Maurice Kremer for deletion who died in 1907 while his rationale refers to a different Maurice Kremer who has an award in his name and was born in 1907. {https://nebraskalegislature.gov/education/kremer.php} I wonder how much investigation he did? Kremer was one of the early Jewish government servants in Los Angeles, founding member of Wilshire Boulevard Temple, and along with several other Eastern European immigrants, funded the development of LA's first streetcar system and the power and water networks. Patapsco913 (talk) 18:25, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I see 8 sources. Even if these are not in-depth, per WP:BASIC I think these sources combine to make the case for a person who is notable for what he did, which is the basic definition of notability, per the lead of Wikipedia:Notability (people). I mean, he was Treasurer of Los Angelos, that sounds notable to me. Debresser (talk) 18:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Debresser: passes WP:ANYBIO. ——SN 54129 18:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A tough 19th century figure to research, but I'm rather proud of my colleagues, having followed this article for a few months, and seeing multiple editors bring forward sources about this topic. The WP:THREE are [1] [2] [3], and I'd also add [4] [5] (pp. 16–19 and 21) and [6] (though it's short). Levivich ^{[dubious – discuss]} 20:02, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, one of the pioneers of Los Angeles and of the Los Angeles Jewish Community, certainly meets guidelines for notability. Nominator does a google search for a Maurice Kremer who was a Senator from Nebraska and uses the results to try to delete this article, when the two people are not one and the same. This should be snow closed as a disruptive nomination.Sir Joseph ^(talk) 00:34, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SIGCOV, above discussion. Bearian (talk) 02:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.